Surpassing hp limit on supercharger?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 3
From: Benzie, MI
Car: 91 rs
Engine: Blow through 383, 10 psi, xr288hr
Transmission: Manual th350 ATI 3000
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9"
Surpassing hp limit on supercharger?
Ok I just have a what if question. This supercharger is rated for no more than 680 hp. If my motor was making more than that, would it be trying to suck in more air than the supercharger could put out?
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: I
Engine: Taunt
Transmission: Mustangs
I think there are two different sides to this coin. First, if the ratio between the crank pully and the sc pulley won't allow the sc to spin past it's max rated rpm then yes, your engine will try to suck more air then the sc will supply. This will lead to lower then expected boost numbers or maybe even none at all.
Or you could have a pully ratio that will over spin the sc past it's max rated rpm. If the sc doesn't self destruct, it will supply the amount of air the engine wants but it will be at an elevated temprature. A sc can and will spin past it's max rpm, but at a much decreased effieciency. This means more of the energy taken from your engine to drive the sc will be turned into heat, heat leads to detonation, detonation leads to broken parts...
Long story short, overspin it to get more air out of it then it's rated for. If you do this, be ready to deal with a shorter sc life span and the heat it will add to you intake air temps (ie intercooling). People do this all the time, but I wouldn't get too carried away.
Or you could have a pully ratio that will over spin the sc past it's max rated rpm. If the sc doesn't self destruct, it will supply the amount of air the engine wants but it will be at an elevated temprature. A sc can and will spin past it's max rpm, but at a much decreased effieciency. This means more of the energy taken from your engine to drive the sc will be turned into heat, heat leads to detonation, detonation leads to broken parts...
Long story short, overspin it to get more air out of it then it's rated for. If you do this, be ready to deal with a shorter sc life span and the heat it will add to you intake air temps (ie intercooling). People do this all the time, but I wouldn't get too carried away.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Airflow roughly = hp. If the thing is only capable of flowing a certain amount of air at a specific rpm that’s all you’re going to get, doesn’t matter how big an engine you put it in front of.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,100
Likes: 127
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Airflow roughly = hp. If the thing is only capable of flowing a certain amount of air at a specific rpm that’s all you’re going to get, doesn’t matter how big an engine you put it in front of.
Airflow roughly = hp. If the thing is only capable of flowing a certain amount of air at a specific rpm that’s all you’re going to get, doesn’t matter how big an engine you put it in front of.
-- Joe
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
heat depends on the blower's adiabatic efficiency in the range that you're using it in, it could be higher or lower depending on the compressor map. Since he doesn't specify a blower or the cfm or lbs/min that he's at...
BSFC depends on a ton of things but probably chamber design more then anything else, since that isn’t going to change much in the range of heads that almost everyone around here runs you can pretty much assume that that is static.
BSFC depends on a ton of things but probably chamber design more then anything else, since that isn’t going to change much in the range of heads that almost everyone around here runs you can pretty much assume that that is static.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







