3in vs dual 2 1/4?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
3in vs dual 2 1/4?
Which setup will work better for me? currently i have slp 1 3/4 headers and 3in cat (not gutted)and cat back, dual 2 1/2 edelbrock...and i can get a 2 1/4 true dual exhaust kit for my car no cat with 2 mufflers(of my choice) the headers i think are 1 1/2 in primaries which are small but actually they are the same size as the exhaust ports on my heads....so larger would probably benifit but who knows... anyways im wondering which one i would benifit from, i can think of it as 2 1/4+2 1/4= 4 1/2 vs. 3. but would that technically be right?....what do you guys think..
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I think you should have stayed awake in math class.
The diameter of the tubing is important because it equates to flow area.
Flow area of a circular section is radius squared times pi - or diameter squared times pi, divided by 4 (pi is roughly 3.14159).
Try the math again. Don't forget, tubing is specified by outside diameter, so the flow area is less by the wall thickness (and each diameter has two walls).
The diameter of the tubing is important because it equates to flow area.
Flow area of a circular section is radius squared times pi - or diameter squared times pi, divided by 4 (pi is roughly 3.14159).
Try the math again. Don't forget, tubing is specified by outside diameter, so the flow area is less by the wall thickness (and each diameter has two walls).
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,773
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: 3in vs dual 2 1/4?
Originally posted by TPIMarow6.6
anyways im wondering which one i would benifit from, i can think of it as 2 1/4+2 1/4= 4 1/2 vs. 3. but would that technically be right?....what do you guys think..
anyways im wondering which one i would benifit from, i can think of it as 2 1/4+2 1/4= 4 1/2 vs. 3. but would that technically be right?....what do you guys think..
3" pipe = 1.5^2 * Pi = 7.065 in^2
dual 2.25" = (1.125^2 * Pi)*2 = 7.94 in^2
You can see that all that work to fab up duals only gains you minimal pipe size advantage. A single 4" will go much farther.
EDIT: Looks like five7 beat me to it
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
im not "fabbing" duals, i can get a kit for 135 bucks.... plus like 100 bucks for headers.... thats less than about 700 i put into the current system...
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
in fact anyone can get the kit, its made for dual pipes running in the stock location.... dynomax 89009 .....look it up... www.summitracing.com obviously it comes with no mufflers or headers. but headers are like 105 and mufflers, you can decide on that....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
They exit both on the drivers side but you can easily have them come out both. my brother had it on his transam about 5-10 years ago. it seems that nobody knows that they even made it......
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 2
From: winthrop harbor, il & plymouth, il
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: 383 sbc
Transmission: th-400
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 bolt/Detroit TrueTrac 4.
i looked into this but i have a hard time believing it is a bolt in system. i am sure there is some fabrication that has to be made. the clearance on our cars is horrible. plus they arnt mandrel bent either.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
go to www.summitracing.com and do a search for part number 89009 and itll show the pic of it.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
Oh ok i dont have any pics of it on the car but i can show you kinda what it looks like on it from underneath http://mysite.verizon.net/vze84hud/duals/ go down to the ones where the pipes run side by side, that shows a good example of it and both mufflers sit parallel to eachother in the back. that pic isnt of this system i dont think but i couldnt tell ya
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Winona, MN
Car: 85 Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700r4
Why couldn't you run 2 2.5 I-Pipes next to each other? I have been wondering that for some time now I would think it would fit with just minor mods. It would look like the pic above......
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
2 1/4 duals or 3" single? I'd take the 3" even though it will flow slightly less. Think of all the extra weight the additional pipes and muffler would have. So even if you gained a few extra HP from it, you'd probably cancel it out due to weight.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
its not just a gain in hp, its also a different sound, but its not my choice i am just debating on what to do....and yeah it would look just like that, you could probably get one of your buddies to get the kit and be like "before you put it on" and bring it to a shop who can mandrel bend them for you and say you want the exact same thing exept 2.5.....possibly that could work, with some modifications obviously.....just a thought
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Car: 1985 Trans Am
this thread had the wrong p/n for the headers that go with the kit:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=91099
should be 85012, but these headers have 1-1/2" primaries, so i'd have to say no on this...but maybe with SLP headers you could use the y-pipe that comes with it to make starter pipes as they are 2-1/4" also. Just thinking kinda out loud.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=91099
should be 85012, but these headers have 1-1/2" primaries, so i'd have to say no on this...but maybe with SLP headers you could use the y-pipe that comes with it to make starter pipes as they are 2-1/4" also. Just thinking kinda out loud.
Last edited by 85TransAm406; Sep 10, 2004 at 10:35 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
well my ports are 1 1/2 inches so why go bigger just to neck down at the collector?.....well i dunno i read all the arguements on the other post and i dont want to start one but....i dont know
Exactly.
Neither do I think you know.
"i read all the arguements on the other post and i dont want to start one..." ...then why did you start an argumentative thread?
Re: "why go bigger just to neck down..."
Thermal energy loss=physical change (density)
Though, I do not think our uses are quite that necessitating.
Neither do I think you know.
"i read all the arguements on the other post and i dont want to start one..." ...then why did you start an argumentative thread?
Re: "why go bigger just to neck down..."
Thermal energy loss=physical change (density)
Though, I do not think our uses are quite that necessitating.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
I didnt read the other threads about it before, i looked but didnt see that one and so i figured maybe someone has had both plus im not sure how the other true dual system sounds on the car.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
im gonna relace my exhaust this week.. im gonna get a pair of ACS hooker 2460 headers.. i need to have a ypipe fabbed up anyway if i get the hooker catback, would it be a pain to have these pipes modified to match up to my headers and then have two mufflers installed (just the pipes from the mid-pipes to the mufflers)? Im just trying to figure out what im gonna do
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,773
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Rabbitt
im gonna relace my exhaust this week.. im gonna get a pair of ACS hooker 2460 headers.. i need to have a ypipe fabbed up anyway if i get the hooker catback, would it be a pain to have these pipes modified to match up to my headers and then have two mufflers installed (just the pipes from the mid-pipes to the mufflers)? Im just trying to figure out what im gonna do
im gonna relace my exhaust this week.. im gonna get a pair of ACS hooker 2460 headers.. i need to have a ypipe fabbed up anyway if i get the hooker catback, would it be a pain to have these pipes modified to match up to my headers and then have two mufflers installed (just the pipes from the mid-pipes to the mufflers)? Im just trying to figure out what im gonna do
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
I have a guy doing my y-pipe that is gonna charge me 100 for it no matter what (friend of the family) $350 for a good set of coated Headers with a good y-pipe? Its over $500 for the 2055 from ACS coated. I just wanna know if it would be any problem to have the 2 1/4" duals and modified to fit the 2460 headers (ie, has anyone on here ever even gotten the 2 1/4" duals with different headers than what they are designed for).
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Great Lakes State
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Yeah I keep hearing bout guys buying headers then they gotta mess around with y-pipe, cat, etc because all the exhaust stuff gets purchased at different times.
My advice, which was also someone else's at another time, is to buy stuff that all fits together.
I lucked out and got slp headers, slp y-pipe, and an additional fabbed y-pipe, and flowmaster cat-back (which should all fit perfectly together because I bought the guys entire set-up) for $400.
although none of the stuff is coated and chroma-fied, its still a great deal cause I got LCAs and panhard rod with the deal. including shipping too
My advice, which was also someone else's at another time, is to buy stuff that all fits together.
I lucked out and got slp headers, slp y-pipe, and an additional fabbed y-pipe, and flowmaster cat-back (which should all fit perfectly together because I bought the guys entire set-up) for $400.
although none of the stuff is coated and chroma-fied, its still a great deal cause I got LCAs and panhard rod with the deal. including shipping too
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
meh, i just ordered the dual 2 1/4 system and two dynomax mufflers.. my exhaust guy is very confident about the system. oh and i ordered my hooker headers from acs
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
well, the pipes and mufflers will be here by the end of the week, i just need ACS to send me my headers and then the car will be going on the lift for installation
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Great Lakes State
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
headers up
Originally posted by Rabbitt
well, the pipes and mufflers will be here by the end of the week, i just need ACS to send me my headers and then the car will be going on the lift for installation
well, the pipes and mufflers will be here by the end of the week, i just need ACS to send me my headers and then the car will be going on the lift for installation
Not trying to bash ACS. Infact, couple weeks ago I really had my mind set on a nice set of ACS coated 2055s. but I found a cheeper solution...
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
oh yeah, i know.. lol, sux too, but i really want the hooker 2460's and coated and i know ACS is a good product.. just maybe i will get them within a couple of weeks *crosses fingers*
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






