History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2018 | 10:27 PM
  #401  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,459
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

GM didn't make any 350 Convertibles. However, in 1987, ASC made the vert for Chevrolet as a 20th Anniversary Edition in a 305 only, but dealers and owners were able to buy a 1987 350 car and have it converted. Instead of being listed as a 20th Anniversary model, it was labeled Special Edition and had a numbered plaque. The 350 cars are ALL VIN'd with a 2 as the sixth digit, while a factory vert had a 3.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2018 | 01:11 AM
  #402  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by 88IROCvertZ
Wow the claybar looks nasty.. If you can get any decent reflection out of that paint you should be proud!

Clay bar, 3 coats of Megs number 7, 105 and 205 .....starting to shine.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2018 | 07:20 AM
  #403  
SirReveller's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 477
Likes: 41
From: Toronto, ON
Car: '89 'ROC
Engine: 5.7L
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Once you’re done with the clay bar you do a final carnuba wax, right?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2018 | 07:51 AM
  #404  
88IROCvertZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 193
From: New England
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Looks a lot better, but not ready for wax.. I think some more polishing time will do wonders..

Looks like a 60-100 hour polish job to me.. I have a feeling Chazman doesn’t mind

Only bummer is once you get more reflection, you’ll probably find more dings.. hopefully not..
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2018 | 01:19 PM
  #405  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by 88IROCvertZ
Looks a lot better, but not ready for wax.. I think some more polishing time will do wonders..

Looks like a 60-100 hour polish job to me.. I have a feeling Chazman doesn’t mind

Only bummer is once you get more reflection, you’ll probably find more dings.. hopefully not..



You know me too well!
I find that kind of thing fun, relaxing and satisfying . I’m now considering ordering the Dr Color Chip road rash kit. Many hundreds of stone chips have become visible. Too many to do individually. BTW, it took 2 clay bars to get around the car once. The first one went ***** up halfway around the car.

I need to find a PDR guy willing to work on this car. The sheet metal is super thin compared to a 3rd gen.

Last edited by chazman; Aug 19, 2018 at 03:06 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2018 | 09:19 AM
  #406  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Thanks for throwing me under the bus Scott... You should have at least added to my 2016 Roush RS3 the 2005 Mustang Convertible I bought for my wife just to kick me further under the bus while you were at it.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2018 | 06:12 PM
  #407  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,459
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Reply
Old Aug 21, 2018 | 03:16 PM
  #408  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

You know how we joke about poor build quality and how crude our cars are? Well, get yourself a Fox body and see the difference. You'll think your IROC or GTA were made by BMW!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2018 | 03:40 PM
  #409  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

The Mustang has never had the build quality of a Camaro or Firebird... Ford period has never had the build quality of a GM product for sure... Except for maybe a GEO... And I own 2 Fords... I know... Lincoln is on par with Buick from what I can tell however.

one thing that the new Mustang has over the Camaro is 1) Mustang is much more comfortable to sit in 2) You can see out of a Mustang. Camaro is claustrophobic.

Last edited by okfoz; Aug 21, 2018 at 03:50 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2018 | 03:56 PM
  #410  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by okfoz
The Mustang has never had the build quality of a Camaro or Firebird... Ford period has never had the build quality of a GM product for sure... Except for maybe a GEO... And I own 2 Fords... I know... Lincoln is on par with Buick from what I can tell however.

one thing that the new Mustang has over the Camaro is 1) Mustang is much more comfortable to sit in 2) You can see out of a Mustang. Camaro is claustrophobic.
and 3) The Mustang is better looking than the new Camaro.....
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2018 | 04:41 PM
  #411  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Appearances wise there is definitely less of a gap between the Camaro and Mustang today with the 6th generations. However go back to the 80's and 90's and the Mustang was down right homely compared to the F-body. The Fox Mustang looked like a modified Chevette, or one of those 80's chargers, or something... It really was not that special looking... The 94-04 Stang was slightly better than the 79-93, but way way behind appearances to the 4th gen. I own a 2005 Mustang and honestly the build quality is maybe slightly only slightly better than a late 3rd gen...
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2018 | 05:35 PM
  #412  
steves's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Car: 1991 Camaro RS B4C
Engine: 5.7 TPI Crate Motor
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 3.42
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

The SN95 looks way better than the GEO Storm LT1 or the Catfish LS1.

I have owned both an LT1 and an SN95 Cobra. And the Cobra had many more people looking at it.

Last edited by steves; Aug 21, 2018 at 05:45 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 09:51 AM
  #413  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

The Firebird, especially the 98-92 was easily the best looking of the bunch. The 93-97 not so much unless it had the ram air hood.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 10:01 AM
  #414  
88IROCvertZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 193
From: New England
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by okfoz
The Firebird, especially the 98-92 was easily the best looking of the bunch. The 93-97 not so much unless it had the ram air hood.
agreed. Saw a mint 93 Firehawk at a cruise night the other night and it got a lot of attention. I’d say the 4th gen Firehawk is the winner of the mid-late 90s. True classic.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 10:07 AM
  #415  
George Klass's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 306
Likes: 49
From: Montreal
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Lots of Fox Mustang hate. IMO the 5.0 LX coupe is one of the nicest cars ever made, especially 92-93 with body color mouldings. If they look like a Chevette I'd have to say an IROC looks like an 88-90 Z24 hahaha. Those early 80s chargers did have a similar looking front clip tho.

Fourth gens the 98-02 Bird is definitely the nicest of the bunch. Camaro I'd have to hit a 97 because no catfish and has the newer dash. The 93-96 dash is pure *****.

Mustangs 05-09 I don't find they are aging well. Later S197s (10-14) look outstanding.

2015 - present -- Mustang wins all the way. Challenger second and Camaro dead last for me. We had a green 2017 SS 1LE traded in at my work. Nice car but all I saw was a donor motor for my Trans AM hahaha. I swear I would rather rock a mint IROC over any 5th and 6th gen.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 11:20 AM
  #416  
steves's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Car: 1991 Camaro RS B4C
Engine: 5.7 TPI Crate Motor
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 3.42
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by okfoz
The Firebird, especially the 98-92 was easily the best looking of the bunch. The 93-97 not so much unless it had the ram air hood.

I was only thinking of Camaro's. The best looking 4th gens are the Firehawks hands down. The biggest problem with the fourth gen is even the SLP cars had wheel and tire combinations that are too small. It's most noticeable if you are looking at an angle of the back of the car.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 03:01 PM
  #417  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Don't take me wrong... It is not that I "hate" the Fox Mustang, but it just seemed bland compared to the 82-92 F-body. The Capri was a much much better looking car from 79 - early 80's than its Mustang Sibling...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 03:17 PM
  #418  
88IROCvertZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 193
From: New England
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by okfoz
Don't take me wrong... It is not that I "hate" the Fox Mustang, but it just seemed bland compared to the 82-92 F-body. The Capri was a much much better looking car from 79 - early 80's than its Mustang Sibling...
I agree, the first time I sat in a 88 Fox Mustang LX I was disappointed that It felt like I was in my friend’s mom’s Taurus station wagon. The first time I saw an IROC up close I was sold. More exotic, more muscular stance, sporty, muscular interior with that “Z28 IROC Z” badge just staring at you.. The Mustangs grew on me as more of a sleeper type car. The first time I got barked at by an LX notchback I was taken aback. And even moreso when it would beat me by more than a car length.. Wouldn’t expect that from it’s looks which is a cool thing.



Last edited by 88IROCvertZ; Aug 22, 2018 at 03:25 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 03:19 PM
  #419  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Well, I was trying not to get too Mustangy here, but I took these pics today:






Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 03:26 PM
  #420  
88IROCvertZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 193
From: New England
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Looks solid! Interior looks good too!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 03:46 PM
  #421  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by 88IROCvertZ
Looks solid! Interior looks good too!
The undercarriage of this car is immaculate. It should clean up great once I power wash it. I think I'm done rubbing on this paint, it's as shiny as it's gonna get.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 04:19 PM
  #422  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by 88IROCvertZ


I agree, the first time I sat in a 88 Fox Mustang LX I was disappointed that It felt like I was in my friend’s mom’s Taurus station wagon. The first time I saw an IROC up close I was sold. More exotic, more muscular stance, sporty, muscular interior with that “Z28 IROC Z” badge just staring at you.. The Mustangs grew on me as more of a sleeper type car. The first time I got barked at by an LX notchback I was taken aback. And even moreso when it would beat me by more than a car length.. Wouldn’t expect that from it’s looks which is a cool thing.


After I got my black IROC, I realized almost immediately I wasn't going to daily drive it. I kept my old '84 GLH going, but it was becoming a maintenance nightmare. I almost bought a '90 LX notch, 5 speed, 3.08 as a daily driver. I reconsidered and got something FWD.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 05:29 PM
  #423  
George Klass's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 306
Likes: 49
From: Montreal
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Looking good!! What are you going to do for tires/wheels?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 05:36 PM
  #424  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by George Klass
Looking good!! What are you going to do for tires/wheels?
Thanks. Probably the LMR TRX wheels/tires.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 09:11 PM
  #425  
F-body-fan's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 948
Likes: 26
From: Green Bay, WI
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by chazman
You know how we joke about poor build quality and how crude our cars are? Well, get yourself a Fox body and see the difference. You'll think your IROC or GTA were made by BMW!
Told you so... Not a whole lot to them for sure.
Main reason they muscled well against the 3rd gens is because there just wasn't much weight there.
Which in turn made them fun to drive.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 10:58 PM
  #426  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by F-body-fan
Told you so... Not a whole lot to them for sure.
Main reason they muscled well against the 3rd gens is because there just wasn't much weight there.
Which in turn made them fun to drive.
Yes you did. And I knew it, but really know it now!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2018 | 12:12 AM
  #427  
EP90266's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
Car: 85 Recaro TA 87 IROC Vert 86 Z Vert
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

I have one of the four 350's sent to ASC for conversion...all paperwork including invoice and dealer receipts. #209
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2018 | 09:37 PM
  #428  
86blackiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 119
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by George Klass
I had one, an 89 lol. My grandfather has an 84 Eurosport. In Greece since 1990. I love that car. We are both 84s and it was my first introduction to the General.
Just about anyone that has owned a Celebrity has liked it. A Eurosport with the 2.8 was a darn fine car, not to mention that with a good set of tires, the handling was very near that of a 3rd gen.

And imho, the comparison of a fox body to a Chevette was not a good one. They always reminded me of an Escort EXP. The early GT's were the better looking of the Fox's though.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2018 | 05:45 AM
  #429  
F-body-fan's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 948
Likes: 26
From: Green Bay, WI
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

The chevette was a complete roller-skate. It was in a league of its own. Built cheap & meant for economy only.
From just a build quality perspective to GM, I would compare the Fox bodies closer to the Chevy Monza's & Vegas.
While not being produced throughout the same time period, they had a lot of the same type of fit & finish characteristics imo. The 89 mustang GT was a cool year. If I was to get another GT, it would be a solid colored 87-89 5 speed,
The ground effects with the finned wheels & body colored taillights was a cool look. Not a fan of the two tone with silver bottom though. The front end that came out in 87 seemed ok at the time, but doesn't do much for me today.

Last edited by F-body-fan; Aug 25, 2018 at 05:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 01:29 PM
  #430  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Anyone here ever regret selling a car?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 01:35 PM
  #431  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,459
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

I'll let you know in a few months after I do it!!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 01:41 PM
  #432  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by chazman
Anyone here ever regret selling a car?
Not when I buy 2 more to replace it.......
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 01:56 PM
  #433  
1MeanZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by chazman
Anyone here ever regret selling a car?
Not yet, but I got cold feet on selling my GTA. It's still listed, but I'm not pushing the sale and I'm not moving on price if anyone asks. So maybe I'm avoiding some heartburn?

I do regret not buying your 83Z, but it just wasn't a good time for me $$ wise. I'm in position now to buy it, which is the annoying part LOL

Do you regret getting rid of the 'stang?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 02:02 PM
  #434  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by 1MeanZ
Not yet, but I got cold feet on selling my GTA. It's still listed, but I'm not pushing the sale and I'm not moving on price if anyone asks. So maybe I'm avoiding some heartburn?

I do regret not buying your 83Z, but it just wasn't a good time for me $$ wise. I'm in position now to buy it, which is the annoying part LOL

Do you regret getting rid of the 'stang?
No regrets. Sometimes you are just done with a car, and the desire to own it ends like someone clicked off a light switch. I figured I’d sell it in the Spring or Summer and just put it on eBay for the heck of it - and whaddya know it sold!

I do do sometimes regret selling the ‘87, though.



Last edited by chazman; Jan 31, 2019 at 03:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 02:04 PM
  #435  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
Not when I buy 2 more to replace it.......
You’ve got that formula down! 😀
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 02:13 PM
  #436  
BizJetTech's Avatar
Supreme Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 236
From: Sunny Florida
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by chazman

You’ve got that formula down! 😀
Yep - it's all good fun.
Working another deal now.....
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 02:18 PM
  #437  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by BizJetTech
Yep - it's all good fun.
Working another deal now.....
Yeah, a lot of the fun is the treasure hunt and the excitement of getting them.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 03:24 PM
  #438  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

I have sold several cars over the years, I have never really regretted it. I might miss them, never said "I should not have sold that" It is a perk of owning a 3rd gen, they are comparatively cheap...

John
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 07:26 PM
  #439  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by okfoz
I have sold several cars over the years, I have never really regretted it. I might miss them, never said "I should not have sold that" It is a perk of owning a 3rd gen, they are comparatively cheap...

John
True, there is always the next one!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 12:28 PM
  #440  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Soooooo, I got a text from the current owner of the '87 IROC 'vert I sold him 3 years ago. He wants me to buy it back. Hmmmmmm..........

The day it left me, almost 3 years to the day.


Last edited by chazman; Jun 26, 2021 at 12:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 02:11 PM
  #441  
LeonardS's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 787
Likes: 173
From: Jamestown, ND
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by chazman
Soooooo, I got a text from the current owner of the '87 IROC 'vert I sold him 3 years ago. He wants me to buy it back. Hmmmmmm..........

The day it left me, almost 3 years to the day.


Its only money! Bring it home……you might not get another chance.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 02:19 PM
  #442  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by LeonardS
Its only money! Bring it home……you might not get another chance.
Oh, Leonard........you are a bad influence!

I'd have to sell my newly recommissioned 37K mile, '81 X-11.




Last edited by chazman; Jun 28, 2021 at 01:20 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 02:24 PM
  #443  
LeonardS's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 787
Likes: 173
From: Jamestown, ND
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

The X-11 would be down the road in one minute! Of course I don’t have history with the car like you do.🤓🤓
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 03:05 PM
  #444  
F-body-fan's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 948
Likes: 26
From: Green Bay, WI
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by chazman
Soooooo, I got a text from the current owner of the '87 IROC 'vert I sold him 3 years ago. He wants me to buy it back. Hmmmmmm..........

The day it left me, almost 3 years to the day.
Seeing you know what he paid for it, it should be the same price?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 03:58 PM
  #445  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by F-body-fan
Seeing you know what he paid for it, it should be the same price?

Here's the thing. When I sold it, I felt that for me personally, I would NEVER spend that kind of money on this car. Not that it wasn't worth it for someone, just not me. He wants me to buy it for $1500 more than what I sold it to him for. Probably still fair, but if there is no way I'd spend what I sold it for, I'm certainly not going to buy it for even more.

It would have to be for substantially less than I sold it for. Plus there is also the crazy price of shipping nowadays to consider.

The current owner has A LOT of cars. But he wants to make room for a Ferrari and a all steel deuce coupe. Also some changes were made in the past 3 years. He installed a tan top, (like he had on it's twin back in the day), had the carb rebuilt even though it didn't need it and removed the cat because his mechanic said it was clogged.

I think.....I'd be in at around $14K, which probably means this deal won't happen.

Last edited by chazman; Jun 27, 2021 at 01:15 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 04:05 PM
  #446  
burnout88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 17
From: Somewhere
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

LG4 car right? It’s hard sell without TPI. Everyone wants TPI with an IROC badge


Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 04:21 PM
  #447  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by burnout88
LG4 car right? It’s hard sell without TPI. Everyone wants TPI with an IROC badge
Yup, which I personally don’t mind. I’ve already got 3 TPIs sitting in my garage.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2021 | 05:04 PM
  #448  
LeonardS's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 787
Likes: 173
From: Jamestown, ND
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

You know you want it! Bring it home!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2021 | 02:31 PM
  #449  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 905
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

No way I'd give up the X-11 for a 4th IROC, especially one that you had once before decided was expendable.

Last edited by DynoDave43; Jun 27, 2021 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2021 | 08:32 PM
  #450  
86blackiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 119
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: 1987 IROC-Z convertible. Are 4 IROCs too many?

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
No way I'd give up the X-11 for a 4th IROC, especially one that you once before decided was expendable.
Agree!

But I also love X11's their A-body brother too. Have you shown pictures of it here before? If so, I missed it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.