liftbars and relocation brackets used together?
05-28-2004, 12:57 PM
#3
06-01-2004, 04:42 PM
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why wouldn't he want lift bars? Why not beef up the lift bars alittle and pitch the torque arm?
Like this: http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/...rebird/10bolt/
What's the problem with doing that? I'm not trying to be a smarta** just curious cause I was thinking of going with that setup myself.
Brandon
Like this: http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/...rebird/10bolt/
What's the problem with doing that? I'm not trying to be a smarta** just curious cause I was thinking of going with that setup myself.
Brandon
06-02-2004, 03:48 PM
#5
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,272
Likes: 0
Received 396 Likes
on
302 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Brandon84
Why wouldn't he want lift bars? Why not beef up the lift bars alittle and pitch the torque arm?
Like this: http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/...rebird/10bolt/
What's the problem with doing that? I'm not trying to be a smarta** just curious cause I was thinking of going with that setup myself.
Brandon
Why wouldn't he want lift bars? Why not beef up the lift bars alittle and pitch the torque arm?
Like this: http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/...rebird/10bolt/
What's the problem with doing that? I'm not trying to be a smarta** just curious cause I was thinking of going with that setup myself.
Brandon
06-02-2004, 04:45 PM
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Thats not quite just a LCARLB an adjustable LCA... Thats more like a primitive 4-link. Notice both sides have 2 control arms?
I wish SSM was still in business. They made a pretty nice set of traction bars that would eliminate the torque arm. Similar to the pictures above only the bars were located inward more and were attached to a crossmember placed inbetween the subframe. I know quite a few cars that hook VERY well with them.
I wish SSM was still in business. They made a pretty nice set of traction bars that would eliminate the torque arm. Similar to the pictures above only the bars were located inward more and were attached to a crossmember placed inbetween the subframe. I know quite a few cars that hook VERY well with them.
06-02-2004, 10:34 PM
#7
Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89' RS TPI,04' HEMI Dodge Q-cab
Engine: 383ci
Transmission: TCI 700R4, 3400 stall
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73
lift bars
I have a set of the SSM bars on my car now. Can't wait to see how they work. I bought the bars, the 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73's and disc backing plates, and an aluminum drive shaft for $1500....gotta love THAT!!
I found it odd that they eliminated the torque arm....but after bolting them up, I now understand how they eliminate "roll" in the rearend.
Pretty cool.
I found it odd that they eliminated the torque arm....but after bolting them up, I now understand how they eliminate "roll" in the rearend.
Pretty cool.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post