full mod 3rd gen suspension VS full mod 4th gen....
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z
Engine: Somethin Nice!!
Transmission: T56
full mod 3rd gen suspension VS full mod 4th gen....
ok i just want some facts, ive read tons on handling characteristics of both generations but i want to have everything summed up and simplified all in one thread.
stock for stock i guess it goes to the 3rd gen seeing as the 1LE 3rd pulls 1 G off showroom and 4th gen 1LE was .95 Gs...ok now how about modified??
theoretically both cars would have same suspension mods (swaybars, tq arm, panhard LCAs 275s on all 4 corners...etc) the 4th gen would have adjustable coilovers on all 4 wheels and so would the 3rd gen.
who would outhandle who?
now what if the 3rd gen also converted to rack steering? being lighter from the factory and 1.5" shorter in body height (lower center of gravity), who would be better? this would leave the 4th gen as a higher and heavier car but has shor/long arm front suspension (SLA)....?
stock for stock i guess it goes to the 3rd gen seeing as the 1LE 3rd pulls 1 G off showroom and 4th gen 1LE was .95 Gs...ok now how about modified??
theoretically both cars would have same suspension mods (swaybars, tq arm, panhard LCAs 275s on all 4 corners...etc) the 4th gen would have adjustable coilovers on all 4 wheels and so would the 3rd gen.
who would outhandle who?
now what if the 3rd gen also converted to rack steering? being lighter from the factory and 1.5" shorter in body height (lower center of gravity), who would be better? this would leave the 4th gen as a higher and heavier car but has shor/long arm front suspension (SLA)....?
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
A 4th gen will never match an equally modded 3rd gen. They are just to heavy, 300-500lbs more.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: full mod 3rd gen suspension VS full mod 4th gen....
Originally posted by C Murda
ok i just want some facts, ive read tons on handling characteristics of both generations but i want to have everything summed up and simplified all in one thread.
ok i just want some facts, ive read tons on handling characteristics of both generations but i want to have everything summed up and simplified all in one thread.
theoretically both cars would have same suspension mods (swaybars, tq arm, panhard LCAs 275s on all 4 corners...etc) the 4th gen would have adjustable coilovers on all 4 wheels and so would the 3rd gen.
who would outhandle who?
who would outhandle who?
now what if the 3rd gen also converted to rack steering?
being lighter from the factory and 1.5" shorter in body height (lower center of gravity), who would be better? this would leave the 4th gen as a higher and heavier car but has shor/long arm front suspension (SLA)....?
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
As much as logic says the SLA front suspension of the 4th gens is better (due to the camber curve). I think the CMC and AI series, along with many auto-x's, have shown the thirdgens to be just as capable around a race track, when properly set up. I don't know that one has a distinct advantage over the other. The biggest advantage the 4thgens have over the 3rdgens, in stock form starts with either LT, or LS.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Thirdgen would have a few important advantages over the fourthgen.
Weight - the thirdgen is a few pounds lighter than a fourthgen without the advantage of a LS1 (150lbs) or a coil-over suspension (probably another 25lbs).
Lower center of gravity - fourthgens are at least 4" taller than thirdgens and there isn't many things you can do to besides lowering the car itself.
The ability to replace a lot more components with lighter ones - you can bring a thridgen down an easy 300lbs by just replacing parts with lighter ones - the LS1 is a 150lb savings. Crossmember and coil overs another 50lbs... you get the point.
The only real advantage of the fourthgen is the ride quality of the SLA suspension, and that (thanks to penny pinching GM) is also a compromise in design vs. cost......
Weight - the thirdgen is a few pounds lighter than a fourthgen without the advantage of a LS1 (150lbs) or a coil-over suspension (probably another 25lbs).
Lower center of gravity - fourthgens are at least 4" taller than thirdgens and there isn't many things you can do to besides lowering the car itself.
The ability to replace a lot more components with lighter ones - you can bring a thridgen down an easy 300lbs by just replacing parts with lighter ones - the LS1 is a 150lb savings. Crossmember and coil overs another 50lbs... you get the point.
The only real advantage of the fourthgen is the ride quality of the SLA suspension, and that (thanks to penny pinching GM) is also a compromise in design vs. cost......
#6
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro, 98 Z-28
Seems like the thirdgens Mcpherson strut suspension would be a money pinching design by GM compared to the better double A-arm, coil over on the 4th gen cars. I have a fully built 87 camaro with all Spohn, Eibach and koni parts but the 98 Z-28 feels better with the tighter steering and responsive handling. Yes the 87 will outhandle the 98 but stock for stock it wouldn't have a chance. The third gens have an advantage due to weight, height, width and overall geometry of the car...
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
stock for stock? are you comparing a "stock" car with 20 year old rubber bushings, to a new car?
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro, 98 Z-28
No, I bought the 87 new so I know how it handled, also I bought the 98 new so I know how it handles as well. Stock vs. Stock the 98 feels more solid, that McPherson strut suspension is a cheap, cost efficient set-up for GM, hell the cavaliers and Geo's came with that set-up but if your talking about a modified set-up then yes, the third gens do very well... I don't build these cars for drag racing, I build them to carve corners so after doing this for a number of years that is what I have determined. Everyone has their own opinions so I just expressed mine
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
98, I'm not trying to argue, as I do agree (and I think i posted earlier) that the SLA design is better. But skid-pad numbers from various cars show the 3rdgen actualy does better. Part of this does come down to driver prefrence, as the 4thgens I have driven, felt rather unresponsive, with significant body roll. It just did not inspire the confindence that I get from the thirdgens I drive. Either of them can be pushed to a very high level of performance.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
i just wanted to point something out here, my FULLY OPTIONED LT1 4th gen weighs 3500 lbs without me in the car... that's not much more than a 3rd gen so I don't see where you guys are saying 3rds are so much lighter?
I weighed my old 3rd and it weighed 3450.
I weighed my old 3rd and it weighed 3450.
#12
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 camaro, 98 Z-28
You've got a point, also considering the 4th gens have plastic body panels, aluminum driveshafts, aluminum 4-wheel disc brakes standard, LS1's are over a 100 pounds lighter, etc... hell, even the t-tops are lighter but they are very close too. Also you have got to consider for what the 3rd gens lack in weight the 4th gens make it up with power, double the power too. There are pros and cons to both, personally I like my 98 and 87 just the same. They both have a great personality and are fun to drive..
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Mine weighs 3000#s even less on a good day with only stripped rear interior and the mods in my sig.
#15
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 5.7 Iroc, 2000 SS
Engine: Vortec Hot cam TPI/LS1
Transmission: Pro-Built/T-56
My $.02
I have a Iroc with some chassis modes, and a fully suspension modded 4th gen SS.
from the factory the SS had the optional SLP bilstien performance set up. Seriously the Iroc had and still has way better low speed handling.
Now I started modding the SS, (PHB, LCA, SUBS, STB, Sway bars) and I'll tell you there is no comparison with the the 3rd gen in high speed handling, the SS would blow it off hte road, it feels way safer, and more stable 130 in the Iroc is smooth but scary, 130 in the SS is like glass, and totally solid.
Especially since I put the koni SA's on the 4th gen, the ride and handling is awesome, smooth, controlled, sticks incorners,
Now if the thirdgen had the same amount of work I still don't think it would match the 4th onthe high speed stuff (over 100)
now low speed handling, on a thirdgen with similar mods would be phenominal.
here it is , If I were racing in a parking lot (SCCA, JK!) I would want the thrdgen. If I was an the freeway I'll take the modified 4th gen ( this is admitiing that the stock 4thgens ride nice, and handle horrible( to me))
I have a Iroc with some chassis modes, and a fully suspension modded 4th gen SS.
from the factory the SS had the optional SLP bilstien performance set up. Seriously the Iroc had and still has way better low speed handling.
Now I started modding the SS, (PHB, LCA, SUBS, STB, Sway bars) and I'll tell you there is no comparison with the the 3rd gen in high speed handling, the SS would blow it off hte road, it feels way safer, and more stable 130 in the Iroc is smooth but scary, 130 in the SS is like glass, and totally solid.
Especially since I put the koni SA's on the 4th gen, the ride and handling is awesome, smooth, controlled, sticks incorners,
Now if the thirdgen had the same amount of work I still don't think it would match the 4th onthe high speed stuff (over 100)
now low speed handling, on a thirdgen with similar mods would be phenominal.
here it is , If I were racing in a parking lot (SCCA, JK!) I would want the thrdgen. If I was an the freeway I'll take the modified 4th gen ( this is admitiing that the stock 4thgens ride nice, and handle horrible( to me))
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by Kennerz
My $.02
I have a Iroc with some chassis modes, and a fully suspension modded 4th gen SS.
from the factory the SS had the optional SLP bilstien performance set up. Seriously the Iroc had and still has way better low speed handling.
My $.02
I have a Iroc with some chassis modes, and a fully suspension modded 4th gen SS.
from the factory the SS had the optional SLP bilstien performance set up. Seriously the Iroc had and still has way better low speed handling.
Now I started modding the SS, (PHB, LCA, SUBS, STB, Sway bars) and I'll tell you there is no comparison with the the 3rd gen in high speed handling, the SS would blow it off hte road, it feels way safer, and more stable 130 in the Iroc is smooth but scary, 130 in the SS is like glass, and totally solid.
Especially since I put the koni SA's on the 4th gen, the ride and handling is awesome, smooth, controlled, sticks incorners,
Now if the thirdgen had the same amount of work I still don't think it would match the 4th onthe high speed stuff (over 100)
Especially since I put the koni SA's on the 4th gen, the ride and handling is awesome, smooth, controlled, sticks incorners,
Now if the thirdgen had the same amount of work I still don't think it would match the 4th onthe high speed stuff (over 100)
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
I don’t buy it… my almost fully optioned ’87 formula (no t-tops but otherwise) weighs 3710 (race weight, with me in it, I’m about 300…). My fully optioned ’97 WS6 TA weighed the same way is over 4000#
I don’t buy it… my almost fully optioned ’87 formula (no t-tops but otherwise) weighs 3710 (race weight, with me in it, I’m about 300…). My fully optioned ’97 WS6 TA weighed the same way is over 4000#
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Acworth/Marietta, GA
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Pro 5.0 shifted T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Im an idiot, i dont know what im talking about, im lying, im a stupid *******......yadda yadda.....
Ok now you guys cant say anything about me that i havent said about myself. That being said, im going to say something that will **** a lot of people off......
My 90 'Bird with the F41 "soft ride suspension" felt 10x better on the curves than my buddys 99 Z28. The 4th gen just feels sloppy, my bird carved corners like my old 600 crotch rocket did.
Then again, my daily driver is a 1900# MG so im kinda spoiled when it comes to handling
i wouldnt dare F with a fourth gen in a straight line though...
Ok now you guys cant say anything about me that i havent said about myself. That being said, im going to say something that will **** a lot of people off......
My 90 'Bird with the F41 "soft ride suspension" felt 10x better on the curves than my buddys 99 Z28. The 4th gen just feels sloppy, my bird carved corners like my old 600 crotch rocket did.
Then again, my daily driver is a 1900# MG so im kinda spoiled when it comes to handling
i wouldnt dare F with a fourth gen in a straight line though...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post