Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Panhard Bar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 03:51 AM
  #1  
gholian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Car: 82 Pontiac Firebird s/e
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: TH200C
Panhard Bar

I was thinking of buying a new Panhard bar as the stock one on the car is bending a little. I looked them up and one of the sites I visited says "This is a must for rear end centering after vehicle lowering as well as clearance for running larger tires". I am wondering about the larger tires piece as some previous owner put larger tires on the rear of my car. There is still lots of thread on them so I never bothered changing them. How does the panhard bar compensate for lowering or larger tires. Is it just fitted and tightened as tight as it can go. I was thinking about getting a fixed panhard bar but now am thinking maybe an adjustable one is the way to go. Anyone got any advice?. This is just for regular driving, not performance handling or anything.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 04:57 AM
  #2  
80's Al's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, GA
Car: 89' RS TPI,04' HEMI Dodge Q-cab
Engine: 383ci
Transmission: TCI 700R4, 3400 stall
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73
I would go adjustable....

If you lower your car, the geometry changes.
Under load(sitting on the ground) the panhard bar should be level with the ground/rearend.

If you replace, ALWAYS upgrade!!!!My moto.

80's AL
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
The adjustable panhard bar from Spohn was my first upgrade to the suspension of my car. I got the combo end one. http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1298 I would really recommend the adjustable. It is a must if you change the ride height of your car. For you though, since you aren't really in to the performance side of it, I would say get the dual poly-bushing end. http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1297
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #4  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
I got the Hotchkis one. You won't really notice a difference in it. But , it's just a better thing to have as it IS stronger than the stocker
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #5  
ABJ88's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clarita, California
Car: 1990 RS/2000 Z28
Engine: 5.0/5.7
Transmission: 4L60/4L60E
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/3.23
panhard

Like 91_5.7_TPI said, you should get a dual poly-bushing end panhard. Spherical rod is to noisy for a daily driver and gets louder and louder, even when you maintain it. Check out www.BMRfabrication.com
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #6  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
I've not really noticed any noises coming from mine. It's only been in there since spring 05, I think. With mine, I noticed a slight difference in it when conering hard or when just pushing on the side of the car. Had more resistance to lateral shifting.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
10
Aug 8, 2019 02:16 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.