Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

New Wheels: Check my math.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #1  
GarageToys's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
New Wheels: Check my math.

The time has come to order the wheels for my Firebird. After reading the sticky thread and researching, I picked my tires first: Fronts= 245/45/17, Rears= 275/40/17. Before you tell me to put 18's on it, I want M/T ET Street Radials & 275/40/17 is the largest size they come in.

It seems the general concensus is that 17x9.5" with a 5.5" Backspace is the correct wheel fitment for the rear tires. I've seen pics of this setup and it looks proportional and correct.

My fronts are what requires math. For the front tire width, I will need an 8" wide front wheel. I have an Ed Miller C4HD 13" front brake kit (small bearing hubs) which, according to Dean's post, adds .300" of positive offset to each side. Converting to millimeters, this is +7.620mm offset. Per the chart in the link on the wheel info sticky, for an 8" wide wheel, the closest backspacing would be 4.25", which is -6mm offset. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I would end up with a net offset of +1.62mm. This would mean the new wheels will stick out (toward the wheel well lip) less than 2mm more than stock (stock being a GTA or IROC front wheel which is 8" wide and zero offset, so 4" backspacing). Sound right? Sound like a good plan?

Last edited by GarageToys; Mar 2, 2007 at 06:39 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #2  
mjustdie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Lebanon, PA
Car: 86 IROC, 04 Ram, 05 SRT-4, 95 CBR
Engine: LB9, 5.7 Hemi, 2.4 turbo, 600cc
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 26 spline 3.42's for now
i don't think you will have any problems with that setup. i'm running the same size tire on 17x9's with 4.5" bs all around. the only thing is if you're lowered and hauling *** over a hilly road, you will hear the rubber touch every now and then ( time for coil overs!). the 5.5" bs on the rear will tuck the tires in a little though but will only look like your rears are out about 1/2" more than stock. mine stick right at the end of the quarters and fenders. your fronts will be the ones to worry about. aren't the 245/45's a little taller than the 275/40's? if you do experience any rubbing, just roll the fenders a little. sometimes a baseball bat and a friend watching will take care of that, but not always.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #3  
GarageToys's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
Originally Posted by mjustdie
i don't think you will have any problems with that setup. i'm running the same size tire on 17x9's with 4.5" bs all around.
What are you basing your opinion on? 17x9 with 4.5" BS is totally different than my proposed front setup. Plus, are you running stock brakes or C4HD's? No offense, but I'm really looking for either (1) someone to check my math and tell me if I got it right, or (2) someone with my same front brake setup to tell me what they used.


Originally Posted by mjustdie
...aren't the 245/45's a little taller than the 275/40's?
No, in most tire brands they're both exactly the same... 25.7" However, M/T's spec on the ET Street Radial is 26.0", so the rears will actually be a little taller.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #4  
mjustdie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Lebanon, PA
Car: 86 IROC, 04 Ram, 05 SRT-4, 95 CBR
Engine: LB9, 5.7 Hemi, 2.4 turbo, 600cc
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 26 spline 3.42's for now
i'm just not going to worry about helping anyone anymore who obviously has the smarts to do an equation, but not solve it when they have it written in front of them.

Last edited by mjustdie; Mar 3, 2007 at 08:53 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 02:43 AM
  #5  
camarojustin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 2
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
WHOA... 4.25"bs is WRONG
The brakes you got will move the tire out .3" therefore you need to add that to the bs you want to bring the tire back in. If you want a 4.5" bs like everyone else on this board uses you will want to go with a 4.75"bs on the 8" rim. The 9.5" w/ 5.5bs is good
For reference take a look at Crazy Hawaiians wheels and read this post
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...t=10+inch+rims

Last edited by camarojustin; Mar 3, 2007 at 02:49 AM. Reason: I exagerated a little
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:51 AM
  #6  
mjustdie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Lebanon, PA
Car: 86 IROC, 04 Ram, 05 SRT-4, 95 CBR
Engine: LB9, 5.7 Hemi, 2.4 turbo, 600cc
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 26 spline 3.42's for now
remember, it's his math he is worried about.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #7  
GarageToys's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
Originally Posted by camarojustin
...The brakes you got will move the tire out .3" therefore you need to add that to the bs you want to bring the tire back in. If you want a 4.5" bs like everyone else on this board uses you will want to go with a 4.75"bs on the 8" rim...
OK, that makes sense. All I need to figure out is the point from which I need to start adding/subtracting (4.5" BS is the reference you suggest). Here's what I don't understand: A wheel with zero offset means that the mounting hub of the wheel is in the exact center of the wheel. However, on Skulte's site, it lists 82-92 Camaro 16x8" (front) Iroc wheels as "zero offset, 4.35" backspacing". That seems wrong to me. On an 8" wheel, shouldn't zero offset equal 4" backspacing (since the 4" mark would be the center of the 8" wheel)?

I was thinking that 4"BS was my target and I add/subtract from there to compensate for my brakes. In reading everyone else's posts, they're all using 4.5" BS on 8" wheels (with stock brakes). There's something I obviously don't understand I guess.

To mjustdie: Sorry if I pissed in your Cheerios, but you weren't giving me good info. Don't take it so hard, it's only the internet. If you want to take jabs at me, please PM me instead of posting in my thread.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 11:15 PM
  #8  
xpndbl3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
kev
sounds to me if you're wheel track width overall is out .3" due to the brakes then adding .25 to the backspacing aka 4.5 stock to 4.75 new would work out nicely. Just my .02 don't kill me if i'm wrong, but i'm 99% sure that's how you should go. For the rears that sounds amazing and the M/T drag radials hook like a dream
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #9  
camarojustin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 2
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
[quote=Firebird 383;3251056] Here's what I don't understand: A wheel with zero offset means that the mounting hub of the wheel is in the exact center of the wheel. However, on Skulte's site, it lists 82-92 Camaro 16x8" (front) Iroc wheels as "zero offset, 4.35" backspacing". That seems wrong to me. On an 8" wheel, shouldn't zero offset equal 4" backspacing (since the 4" mark would be the center of the 8" wheel)?

Yes you are right, 0 offset should mean 4" bs on an 8 inch wheel. I honestly can't answer why Skulte says that is 4.35" bs and I don't wanna BS you. I always figure stuff out using backspacing ( never offset ) and I know that 4.5" bs is what everyone uses on the fronts with stock brakes.
However,
If you look at Crazy Hawaiians car in the link I posted earlier he has 8.5 inch fronts on stock brakes with 4.5bs which would stick out as much as an 8inch rim with 4" backspacing and it looks good too. And concequently would be very close to what yours would look like with an 8in rim with 4.5bs and your brake upgrade.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2007 | 08:06 AM
  #10  
dennis teichera's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: On the apex
Car: a car
Engine: one that propells the car
Your problem is that you are ASSuming zero offset on an 8" wheel is equal to 4" of backspacing; that is incorrect. Try a little "googling" and you will find the information you seek.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 10:26 PM
  #11  
GarageToys's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
Originally Posted by dennis teichera
Your problem is that you are ASSuming zero offset on an 8" wheel is equal to 4" of backspacing; that is incorrect. Try a little "googling" and you will find the information you seek.
Google is how I got the wrong info the first time. I just re-googled and got a couple different answers. Apparently, the inner and outer beads are not figured into my equation above and that is what makes the backspacing on an IROC wheel 4.35" instead of 4"?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #12  
xpndbl3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
sheesh Kev, look at how cocky the n00bs on this site talk to the guys who have been here for years and years. I'd order up some 4.75bs rims and see what happens, don't mount a tire on them and if in doubt you could return them just in case. I think that should work out nicely on the front.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #13  
askulte's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 888
Likes: 6
From: West Hartford, CT
Car: '89 Z28tt
Engine: Dart Little M Twin Turbo
Transmission: T56
Originally Posted by camarojustin
Yes you are right, 0 offset should mean 4" bs on an 8 inch wheel. I honestly can't answer why Skulte says that is 4.35" bs and I don't wanna BS you.
An 8" wide wheel will be 8" between the inside of the beads, or 4" backspace to the inside of the wheel lip. I usually add a bit for the bead thickness and tire bulge, since that's the true inside edge of the wheel/tire (as if you laid a straight-edge on it, and measured to the mounting surface of the wheel's hub). You're usually interested in the max inside of the wheel contacting some bodywork or suspension, which is why I measure it that way.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #14  
GarageToys's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
Originally Posted by xpndbl3
...I'd order up some 4.75bs rims and see what happens, don't mount a tire on them and if in doubt you could return them just in case...
I can't do that-- I'm having them custom built, so no returns if they don't fit. Plus, I might buy a wheel/tire package so they'll arrive mounted and balanced.


Originally Posted by askulte
...I usually add a bit for the bead thickness and tire bulge, since that's the true inside edge...
That's what I found out when I re-Googled. There's so much wrong info on the web that you can't always trust the first thing you read, which is what I did on the offset equation. Thanks for helping set me straight.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
24
Jul 6, 2024 08:32 PM
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
Feb 26, 2016 02:57 PM
skeltor
DFI and ECM
17
Feb 2, 2016 10:37 AM
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Sep 12, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 AM.