Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

a quick four-link question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 12:40 AM
  #1  
Batass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 3
From: Benzie, MI
Car: 91 rs
Engine: Blow through 383, 10 psi, xr288hr
Transmission: Manual th350 ATI 3000
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9"
a quick four-link question

I've been tossing around this idea because I want to use an 8.5" rear and would need to lose the torque arm. I dont want to backhalf the car.

I partly understand that you need to brace the floor. I have a cage in it and the floor is bare, and I'd do the work myself.

Question is would all this work and extra money for a 4-link negate the lower cost of an 8.5? I would roughly save $1000 with the 8.5.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #2  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,269
Likes: 170
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: a quick four-link question

It's going to be very difficult to put a 4-link in the car without doing a back half. You can see the amount of work involved in doing a back half in the fabrication forum under my thread about a "back half project".

Doing a back half isn't an easy project to do and paying someone to do it would be around $10,000. There's no other way to install a 4-link without cutting out the rear floor and installing new frame rails for the 4-link chassis brackets to attach to.

You could install ladder bars much easier. I ran ladder bars for many years as an easy way to install a 9" in my car. Only minor fabrication work is required.

You're trying to save money. If you don't know what you're doing when changing the suspension, it may end up costing you more.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #3  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 438
Likes: 1
From: state of confusion
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: a quick four-link question

Why not build a custom torque arm that mounts off a plate that's held by the 12 bolts? Same sort of axle side attachment as the GNX (and the Kirban aftermarket copy) use for their similar-looking traction arm. But at the front of your torque arm, keep the normal F-body arrangement.


Norm
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #4  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
Re: a quick four-link question

as stephen said, you basically have to back half the car. There is a lot of geometry in properly designing a 4-link. The race type set-ups don't work well on the street, as non-parrallel links will create roll oversteer when cornering. - ladder bars don't work well on the street, as they don't allow any rear body roll.

One way or the other, personally I would look into tieing the tq arm back to the 8.5
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #5  
Batass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 3
From: Benzie, MI
Car: 91 rs
Engine: Blow through 383, 10 psi, xr288hr
Transmission: Manual th350 ATI 3000
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9"
Re: a quick four-link question

A lot of ppl poop on the tq arm, but it seems to be a really good idea.
I would like to stick with it for all around functionality.
I cant find any pictures of the gnx one, I guess it was only factory in '87???
It might be possible to fab up my own...
I'm guessing around the housing, to a row of bolts on top, row on bottom?
I think it would take lots of little peices and corner bracing to make it stiff....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
happyhapka
TPI
3
Aug 15, 2015 04:42 PM
jahblah
Tech / General Engine
5
Aug 12, 2015 05:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.