UMI Torque Arm or UMI Subframe Connectors??
12-09-2008, 09:39 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow, KY
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87' GTA
Engine: 350 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-Bolt
UMI Torque Arm or UMI Subframe Connectors??
Alright folks....
My question for you all is:
Which would be more beneficial and how??
UMI Subframe Connectors or a UMI Adjustable Torque arm?
Im looking for better straight-line traction, but all around driving is important to..
My current suspension upgrades include:
--------------------------------------
UMI Performance Rear Lower Control Arms.
UMI Performance Panhard Bar
Top-Down Solutions Polygraphite Front Sway Bar bushings
Top-Down Solutions Polygraphite Rear Sway Bar bushings
Top-Down Solutions Nylon Sway Bar End Links
--------------------------------------
My question for you all is:
Which would be more beneficial and how??
UMI Subframe Connectors or a UMI Adjustable Torque arm?
Im looking for better straight-line traction, but all around driving is important to..
My current suspension upgrades include:
--------------------------------------
UMI Performance Rear Lower Control Arms.
UMI Performance Panhard Bar
Top-Down Solutions Polygraphite Front Sway Bar bushings
Top-Down Solutions Polygraphite Rear Sway Bar bushings
Top-Down Solutions Nylon Sway Bar End Links
--------------------------------------
12-10-2008, 05:28 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SoCal "Riverside"
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: UMI Torque Arm or UMI Subframe Connectors??
get the SFCs first, your car already has a factory torque arm on it right? but does it have factory SFCs............ they're cheaper and they help 60ft, handling, and make the car feel new, TA just helps 60ft
Last edited by 1988-305-tbi; 12-10-2008 at 05:32 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-10-2008, 08:51 AM
#7
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: UMI Torque Arm or UMI Subframe Connectors??
The consensus is 110% SFCs.
TAs are nice, but parts like the TAs, LCAs....whatever....Transfer power to the chassis. Without a solid chassis, reinforced by SFCs, your not seeing all of the parts benefits.
TAs are nice, but parts like the TAs, LCAs....whatever....Transfer power to the chassis. Without a solid chassis, reinforced by SFCs, your not seeing all of the parts benefits.
Last edited by Stephen; 12-10-2008 at 09:02 AM.
Trending Topics
12-10-2008, 01:13 PM
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow, KY
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87' GTA
Engine: 350 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-Bolt
Re: UMI Torque Arm or UMI Subframe Connectors??
Well it seems clear now what my choice should be...
SFC's It is then!
Hopefully they will get rid of alot of them annoying squeaks and rattles...
Oh yeah, and help put some more power to the ground
The fact that they're cheaper always helps too lol
SFC's It is then!
Hopefully they will get rid of alot of them annoying squeaks and rattles...
Oh yeah, and help put some more power to the ground
The fact that they're cheaper always helps too lol
12-10-2008, 01:23 PM
#10
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UMI Performance
Sponsored Vendors
0
09-04-2015 09:22 AM
1999, arm, arms, conectors, connect, connectors, frame, gen, install, installation, polygraphite, subframe, torque, umi, z28
