Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Mono ball joint vs Howe tall joint vs something else?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2010 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
Pablo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Mono ball joint vs Howe tall joint vs something else?

I'm researching my options for ball joints. I'd like a joint that would provide me with first and foremost, strength. Secondly I'm looking for something to raise my spindle to help out in the camber curve dept.

It looks like the two main options are the Howe tall ball joints in .5" taller than stock.
or
a mono ball setup like this
http://www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?tp...action=product
They are adjustable and are very close in price to the howe joints. The thing that I can't find is what the range of adjustability is from stock. I.E. what is the maximum height you can adjust to.

Now for both of these the ones I can find online say they replace the 6145 style joint. The P/N I find for our cars is the 6145T, is there any difference between the 6145t and 6145?

Since both of these joints are the same price, what is the catch when using the mono ball?

My buddy claims there is a third option. He is into the off road racing scene (baja trucks) and he claims that on off road trucks, they will mount a mono ball (he calls it a uniball) with a large ID hole with offset drilled sleeves to fit the hole. They drill the spindle so that there is no taper and just install a bolt through with spacers to adjust the height of the spindle. They can also make further suspension adjustments by changing the offset drilled sleeves in the uniball. Sounded like an interesting way to adjust scrub radius, sai, etc.

Is this guy on crack or what? Drilling out the spindle for a bolt and not having an interference fit didn't seem especially safe to me but he claims this is done on offroad trucks all the time.

Anyone ever heard of anything like this for road racing?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Mono ball joint vs Howe tall joint vs something else?

The 'T' is from Moog, the heavy duty version of the 6145 and the only thing they sell now.

IIRC some G-body guys talked about running a taller joint that was from some other application, a truck I think. Its the same joint, see whats out there.

That mono ball looks like a dirt catcher.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 10:45 AM
  #3  
Pablo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Re: Mono ball joint vs Howe tall joint vs something else?

Originally Posted by madmax
The 'T' is from Moog, the heavy duty version of the 6145 and the only thing they sell now.

IIRC some G-body guys talked about running a taller joint that was from some other application, a truck I think. Its the same joint, see whats out there.
Hmm, I'll have to do some searches. That would be awesome if I could find a stock replacement that is taller like that.

I was thinking the same thing about the monoball setup but my friend who is the offroad guy claims that is how they run them off road. I'm assuming they replace them often.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #4  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,807
Likes: 108
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: Mono ball joint vs Howe tall joint vs something else?

there must be a dust boot or something you can use the keep crap out of the monoball. Or just keep them clean and they should work fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MoJoe
Members Camaros
33
Feb 6, 2025 09:47 PM
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
88CamZ
Engine Swap
9
Oct 8, 2015 10:29 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
sjorgens
Suspension and Chassis
7
Oct 1, 2015 07:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.