subframe connectors
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 12
From: Minnesota
Car: 84 camaro, 88 trans am, 98 camaro
Engine: Modded , stock, LSX modded
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, t-56
Axle/Gears: 327, 308, 373
Re: subframe connectors
theirs no best they all do about the same thing some maybe do it better then others the more connecting points the stronger it will be
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 10
From: Texas
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: subframe connectors
When I bought mine I went looking at the individual designs of them. They are all more or less the same with a few differences here and there in terms of connect points. You can get boxed or tubular. I think the boxed sub-frame connectors are easier to weld in personally. There are the S&W, Mac and Alston designs which are the only radically different sub-frame connectors from the rest. You can use the Mac sub-frame connectors along side conventional designs as they mount to a different area. Few have the S&W sub-frame connectors but they connect at some 8 points or something on the underside of the car. Those seem like the best design but they look like they could complicate exhaust routing or the installation of some components. That's just a guess from pictures I've seen in the past. I'm not actually sure as I've never seen them in person. Given their multiple connection points those are probably the single most solid design out there. If you aren't going to be welding these in yourself you need to think about installation cost. The more complex S&W sub-frames will cost more to have welded in than the normal sub-frame connectors will.
I think the ones I purchased were the BMR version.
I think the ones I purchased were the BMR version.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TMZIrocZ350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Oct 7, 2015 12:09 PM
tmork454
Transmissions and Drivetrain
0
Sep 29, 2015 06:33 PM






