Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 355 solid roller (395 stroker soon)
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi
Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
Is any one out there running a pinto rack on a street/road race car? I'd like to go with the rack because of the simplicity of it and looks, but I'm not sure how hard it would be to turn the wheel. I'm gonna be running wide front tires and doing some local autocrosses/road courses with it. Or am i better off fitting a power rack in there?
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: TH350 3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt grenade
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
a power rack would be better (like one from a 4th gen)
you also need to address the issue of getting the turning radius back to normal.
you also need to address the issue of getting the turning radius back to normal.
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 438
Likes: 1
From: state of confusion
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
A Pinto rack is a poor idea for a couple of reasons.
It was designed to steer a car that weighed half a ton less than what you're contemplating using it in.
The location of the inner tierod pivots is almost certainly wrong, meaning you'd likely end up with bumpsteer that cannot be remedied very well.
The manual steering in a Pinto even at the early years weight of 2250# or so, on skinny 6.00-13 bias-ply tires on 4" wide rims, and 4.2 turns lock to lock was fairly heavy at very low speed.
Does 4.2 turns lock to lock sound like a slow ratio to you? It wasn't too bad in a 94" WB car, but will be slower still in a 101" WB car. And that's before considering any difference in steering arm length.
I'm not saying it would be impossible, just that there's a LOT more to consider beyond things like "simplicity" and "how it looks" (that second one shouldn't even be anywhere near your list of design criteria for autocrossing).
BTW, I had a Pinto.
Norm
It was designed to steer a car that weighed half a ton less than what you're contemplating using it in.
The location of the inner tierod pivots is almost certainly wrong, meaning you'd likely end up with bumpsteer that cannot be remedied very well.
The manual steering in a Pinto even at the early years weight of 2250# or so, on skinny 6.00-13 bias-ply tires on 4" wide rims, and 4.2 turns lock to lock was fairly heavy at very low speed.
Does 4.2 turns lock to lock sound like a slow ratio to you? It wasn't too bad in a 94" WB car, but will be slower still in a 101" WB car. And that's before considering any difference in steering arm length.
I'm not saying it would be impossible, just that there's a LOT more to consider beyond things like "simplicity" and "how it looks" (that second one shouldn't even be anywhere near your list of design criteria for autocrossing).
BTW, I had a Pinto.
Norm
Last edited by Norm Peterson; Dec 2, 2010 at 09:18 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
The larger unit off the T-Birds would be a better choice, also available with power steering... As Norm mentioned, pay attention to the length of the steering arms, has a lot to do with steering quickness. I build Hot Rods and won't use the Pinto unit on anything over 2500 pounds....
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 355 solid roller (395 stroker soon)
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
A Pinto rack is a poor idea for a couple of reasons.
It was designed to steer a car that weighed half a ton less than what you're contemplating using it in.
The location of the inner tierod pivots is almost certainly wrong, meaning you'd likely end up with bumpsteer that cannot be remedied very well.
The manual steering in a Pinto even at the early years weight of 2250# or so, on skinny 6.00-13 bias-ply tires on 4" wide rims, and 4.2 turns lock to lock was fairly heavy at very low speed.
Does 4.2 turns lock to lock sound like a slow ratio to you? It wasn't too bad in a 94" WB car, but will be slower still in a 101" WB car. And that's before considering any difference in steering arm length.
I'm not saying it would be impossible, just that there's a LOT more to consider beyond things like "simplicity" and "how it looks" (that second one shouldn't even be anywhere near your list of design criteria for autocrossing).
BTW, I had a Pinto.
Norm
It was designed to steer a car that weighed half a ton less than what you're contemplating using it in.
The location of the inner tierod pivots is almost certainly wrong, meaning you'd likely end up with bumpsteer that cannot be remedied very well.
The manual steering in a Pinto even at the early years weight of 2250# or so, on skinny 6.00-13 bias-ply tires on 4" wide rims, and 4.2 turns lock to lock was fairly heavy at very low speed.
Does 4.2 turns lock to lock sound like a slow ratio to you? It wasn't too bad in a 94" WB car, but will be slower still in a 101" WB car. And that's before considering any difference in steering arm length.
I'm not saying it would be impossible, just that there's a LOT more to consider beyond things like "simplicity" and "how it looks" (that second one shouldn't even be anywhere near your list of design criteria for autocrossing).
BTW, I had a Pinto.
Norm
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Car: 86 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 565ci 900 hp
Transmission: T56 Magnum by RPM Transmissions
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/4:56 Detroit Locker
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
I have the pinto rack from Racecraft on a street car, with their spindles with shorten arms, no problem to steer, have no bump steer what so ever with the car. I believe the lock to lock is 3 and 1/2 turns, but will check for sure. I had a pinto rack in one of my first generations cars with a BBC, it was easier to steer than the manual steering box it came with
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 355 solid roller (395 stroker soon)
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
I have the pinto rack from Racecraft on a street car, with their spindles with shorten arms, no problem to steer, have no bump steer what so ever with the car. I believe the lock to lock is 3 and 1/2 turns, but will check for sure. I had a pinto rack in one of my first generations cars with a BBC, it was easier to steer than the manual steering box it came with
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Car: 86 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 565ci 900 hp
Transmission: T56 Magnum by RPM Transmissions
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/4:56 Detroit Locker
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
The reason I chose a pinto rack was because it looks fairly straight forward, racecraft sells a rack that comes shortened to fit f body's, and also the bumpsteer kits that fit the stock spindle. I'm gonna do a bit more research and try to find a good power rack to use instead.
If the inner tie rod pivot points are moved, then a "bumpsteer kit" will not correct the problem. Lowering the mounting point of the outer tie rod end is to correct the angle of the tie rod relative to your control arm. If you get a taller ball joint or run a ton of caster you would need a tie rod spacer. Moving the inner pivot points inboard or outboard will not be corrected by spacing the tie rod end. You could up making things even worse.
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 438
Likes: 1
From: state of confusion
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
I have the pinto rack from Racecraft on a street car, with their spindles with shorten arms, no problem to steer, have no bump steer what so ever with the car. I believe the lock to lock is 3 and 1/2 turns, but will check for sure. I had a pinto rack in one of my first generations cars with a BBC, it was easier to steer than the manual steering box it came with
FWIW, the required pull at the steering wheel rim was 28 lbs (about the same as the manual steering on the bigger Ford cars of the same year). That wasn't undriveably firm (though probably too high for commmercial success today), and it lightened up quite a bit once you got it rolling. Definitely "autocross-able" once you'd gotten accustomed to it (and had probably improved your upper body muscle tone as a result). But definitely on the high side for a car of that weight.
I do get the feeling that your BBC 1st gen wasn't a corner-carver kind of car.
Norm
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Car: 86 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 565ci 900 hp
Transmission: T56 Magnum by RPM Transmissions
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/4:56 Detroit Locker
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
Your caster setting would figure in to how easily it steered, particularly at speeds under 10 mph. I'm afraid that I don't know enough about those particular tires to even guess if they'd steer "easier" than any of the 13" tires that I ran on the Pinto with around +3° caster.
FWIW, the required pull at the steering wheel rim was 28 lbs (about the same as the manual steering on the bigger Ford cars of the same year). That wasn't undriveably firm (though probably too high for commmercial success today), and it lightened up quite a bit once you got it rolling. Definitely "autocross-able" once you'd gotten accustomed to it (and had probably improved your upper body muscle tone as a result). But definitely on the high side for a car of that weight.
I do get the feeling that your BBC 1st gen wasn't a corner-carver kind of car.
Norm
FWIW, the required pull at the steering wheel rim was 28 lbs (about the same as the manual steering on the bigger Ford cars of the same year). That wasn't undriveably firm (though probably too high for commmercial success today), and it lightened up quite a bit once you got it rolling. Definitely "autocross-able" once you'd gotten accustomed to it (and had probably improved your upper body muscle tone as a result). But definitely on the high side for a car of that weight.
I do get the feeling that your BBC 1st gen wasn't a corner-carver kind of car.
Norm
I will try a pull guage of the steering when the car is back on the ground in the summer. Also, I have taken a couple hundred pounds of weight out of the front of the car
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, New York
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 355 solid roller (395 stroker soon)
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi
Re: Pinto rack on a street car. Bad idea?
I've decided to go with the racecraft road race kmember, and their shortened pinto rack. I will be posting pics of the car/build once i get my welding shop all set up and ready to go.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM





