TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

fastest times with tbi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2005, 04:43 PM
  #1  
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
 
costill91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '02 Rodeo
Engine: 3.2 V6 DOHC
Transmission: 5spd
Axle/Gears: 4.30 Dana 44 Rear 10 bolt front
fastest times with tbi

ok, i am involved with an argument that tbi sucks, i explain that it is more the fault of the fact. tune, cam, heads and manifold.
so what are some of the fast tbi times?
i would like to prove a point that tbi doesn't suck, so people dont just say go tpi, or go carb its better
thanks for your help
costill91Z is offline  
Old 03-14-2005, 04:57 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
vjo90RS8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
14.791 @ 91.11MPH with mods in sig minus tranny, 2400 stall TC, and intake manifold. The times are with stock tbi, stock heads, stock camshaft, stock manifold, and a tbichips.com basic mailorder chip. Im hoping to make it to the track this weekend to see how the car does with the torque converter and edelbrock intake manifold if it doesnt rain.
vjo90RS8 is offline  
Old 03-14-2005, 05:44 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Gunny Highway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The nation's capital
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
I'm somewhere in the 13's, but I have bald tires and I'm still on the first chip burn. I've also got some 1.6 RR's to go on as well. Most likely will see 12's when it's all said and done.
Gunny Highway is offline  
Old 03-14-2005, 05:49 PM
  #4  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,220
Likes: 0
Received 376 Likes on 289 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
TBI has great potential. The reason why you do not see a lof of fast TBI cars is not because of the system but instead how it is set-up. Many people throw heads and cams on these motors that are poorly matched. On top of that they leave the stock chip in which keeps them dead in the water. They get mad, and go carb ro swear off TBI because they didn't take the time to fully understand it and learn to properly plan, install and tune a combo. For every one person that does it right there are a thousand that do it wrong. People will bash it because it is easier than learning it. Unfortunately society works that way in all realms of life. Word of mouth spreads and then the next thing you know everyone hates it and writes it off. 99% of all TBI haters don't even understand how their system works. They don't realize that these motors came with weak everything.

We understand that this system has its flaws and its limits but one has to put that into perspective. This system was never intended or desinged to make huge HP numbers or run boosted power adders. It was desinged as a torque oriented powerplant to power a fleet of GM vehicles. It was cheap fuel injection. However, it is just like any other system. If you know how the fuel and air delivery work you can make power until the design of the system becomes the limit.

Just look at guys like Dewey who really know TBI. 14.5 with a cat-back , open element, 3.42's (changed his MPH but not ET) and chip work.
ShiftyCapone is offline  
Old 03-14-2005, 08:54 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,008
Received 389 Likes on 332 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Old Combo:
14.95 @ 90 in a full size van with a TBI 350, 601 HO 305 Heads, F-body LT1 cam, edelbrock intake, Ultimate TBI mods, and headers (note factory chip, 6* advance, and 15.5 psi fuel pressure)

New combo has not been checked but feels stronger

TBI 355, Ported 193 swirl ports, F-Body LT1 cam, edelbrock intake, Ultimate TBI mods, headers and DIY chip tuning.

Still have a posi 3.08 rear gear and a 700r4 with a 2,000 rpm stall. That is with a 275/70/R15 tire too. I am geared taller than most of you.

Last edited by Fast355; 03-14-2005 at 08:56 PM.
Fast355 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 12:05 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
SchwarzCamaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fallbrook, CA
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im looking for mid-low 14s with my setup in a couple months.. one day ill get into the 13's, no spray... just dont have the money right now.. lol
SchwarzCamaroRS is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 01:52 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
90RS305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
15.3 BONE STOCK Granted not the fastest car in the world, but perdy dang good for a 3500lb+ sled with the lowest powerd V8 to grace a bowtie...

Bruce (90RS305)
90RS305 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 02:46 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
I'm gunning for 12's this year.
Dewey316 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 02:56 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Re: fastest times with tbi

Originally posted by costill91Z
ok, i am involved with an argument that tbi sucks.....

if you're saying it doesnt, you're on the wrong side of the argument.

regardless of anything else, you cant get injectors big enough to support good horsepower (good by modern standards, not 1980s standards)


now, if you're just after how much as someone tweeked a car to take full advantage of its limited power to go the quickest in the 1/4 mile.. id say 12s for a avg weight street/strip 3rdgen.



edit:
thats high12s btw.
and on a tweeked out car.
the only thing making it so its not a 13 second car, is the fact that the CAR ITSELF is tweeked for the strip.. not the TBI making more power.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 03:13 PM
  #10  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
first set up 222 RWH at 5000rpms. 12/1 A/F. 90 deg F 90% humidity. new set up will spin 5500-5800 rpms with new cam and different manifold and better tune. will put on dyno(same one) and check result this spring.
Ronny is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 08:29 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,008
Received 389 Likes on 332 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
90 lb/hr injectors at 30 psi will support more power than one would think. I can drown a 300 hp 350 with 90 lb/hr injectors at 13 psi during ae @ 4,000 or so rpm.

Last edited by Fast355; 03-15-2005 at 08:34 PM.
Fast355 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 09:08 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
I've run a 13.9 @ 97 mph with 70 pphr injectors at 21 psi. I've got tons of room to grow, 12's aren't out of the question. Jon Prevost has run a 13.6 @ over 100 mph, he's only running 65 pphr injectors. With 90 lb'ers over 400 hp is possible. I'll be conservative and say that TBI will support 375 hp at the wheels, that should put the average 3rd gen in the mid to low 12's. TBI has limitations, but like any system they can be tuned around.
BMmonteSS is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 09:22 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
JPrevost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Well I just got a deal on a 4th gen rear so I'm going to put slicks on this rear and get the red sled into the 12's if it means stripping the interior, so be it.
After I get that goal I'm putting the car back into street trim. I figure there needs to be a TBI 330ho crate motor in the 12's after all these years .
I also might have a T5 coming my way which will definatly help.
JPrevost is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 09:41 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Gunny Highway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The nation's capital
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by JPrevost
I figure there needs to be a TBI 330ho crate motor in the 12's after all these years .
Should be there by the end of the year.

Who wants to help me with chip tuning (hell, I'll take help with datalogging at this point )










seriously
Gunny Highway is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 12:38 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
heavychevy454ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 454SS
Engine: 489
Transmission: TH400
I'm looking for 12's in a full size truck with 489ci. I believe VA454SS is running low 13's in his truck.

The TBI can fuel just about any street small block & most street big blocks.
heavychevy454ss is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 12:19 AM
  #16  
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
 
costill91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '02 Rodeo
Engine: 3.2 V6 DOHC
Transmission: 5spd
Axle/Gears: 4.30 Dana 44 Rear 10 bolt front
well, the way i look at it, and, correct me if im wrong, but if you took an L98 or LB9 long block with a tbi set up w/ free tbi mods, a decent intake manifold, and proper computer tuning, wouldn't they make about the same power as their counterpart using tpi? that was kind of the point in my argument, and is why i have not ripped the tbi off and put on the tpi setup i have laying around
costill91Z is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 08:49 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by costill91Z
well, the way i look at it, and, correct me if im wrong, but if you took an L98 or LB9 long block with a tbi set up w/ free tbi mods, a decent intake manifold, and proper computer tuning, wouldn't they make about the same power as their counterpart using tpi? that was kind of the point in my argument, and is why i have not ripped the tbi off and put on the tpi setup i have laying around
no.. it wont.

and for all the arguing that the pro-TBI people will give for it... i dont have a exact reason why.


but my proof is, alot have tried, and noone has done it yet.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 08:58 AM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
its going to have a diffrent powerband.. yes.

you lose the helmholtz tuning of the TPI, so you won't see the 'Peak' toque number.

Mr_Dude, who has done it, had it tuned properly, and had dyno numbers. have they taken the exact same car, switched it to TPI, and gotten numbers on a dyno with that?

In theory (I have not done this) the TBI should make a higher peak HP, and TPI will make more mid-range torque, and likely a higher torque peak.

I will also add, using a STOCK Lb9, is not the right choice for TBI, the cam used, is set to make peak torque, right at the TPI sweet spot with the resonance tuning, this is not a good combination for TBI. If you toss a MILD performance cam, that moves the powerband to where it should be to take advantage of the upsides to TBI, it will outshine stock TPI in the exact combo. Doing a stock LB9 or L98 comparison is not really fair, you are using a cam tuned specificly for that application, along with tuning for that application.
Dewey316 is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 09:43 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
i agree with everything you just said.

like i said, i have no proof as to WHY...
WHY i donno.

it has more CFM then a carb... and you could bolt it on inplace of one..

so i cant answer the WHY it makes less power.


ive only seen the end result.... you know what you've done and what you know about TBI.. you've played with it alot.. and you know your results arnt typical.... but even if they were, im sure you also know you could make more power with another fuel/induction system.

why? i donno.. id be intrested to find out.

but the results are there...
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 10:18 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
I think the big key, is tuning. very few people have a properly tuned TBI vehical that has been modifed. The ones that do, have good results.

Look at what JP has done, he is making more power than GM delivered with that motor, and a carb.

The people who have built motors to let TBI potentialy shine, have given up, and gone to carbs before the motor had even a descent tune. This is why they are seeing the big gains. Tuning a carb involves turning screwdriver, you can get in the ball-park pretty easy.
Dewey316 is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 10:48 AM
  #21  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
someone posted a week or so ago that demon sets up carb to run perfect out of box with no adjusting on owners part. that seems awfully easy to me! no wonder why tbi is sometimes converted to carb. my buddy that is professional mechanic does not understand why any one would run modified TBI with modified engine(me) over a straight carb. apparently he has no confidence that it(mine) will ever be right.
Ronny is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 06:48 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
I ran mid 13's with a 355, using (what was) a Cross Fire, and that was about 8-9 years ago.
Grumpy is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 10:31 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
wade84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R
I doubt Demon can set up a carb anymore perfect than a mail order chip. I would bet a few adjustment on a demon carb could get more power.
wade84 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 07:57 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

 
JPrevost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Carbs are just like MAF, they directly meter the fuel based on actual air flow. Speed density is great when it's setup right but it's a royal PITA when it's not.
Carbs can and for the most part do run near perfect out of the box. This is because they're designed to give x amount of fuel with x amount of airflow through the venturi. Bigger motor gets the same AFR (or very close), the only thing that makes carbs harder to tune is the lack of data-aq. Other than that they're great for getting an engine up and running and for basic racing they're pretty dumby proof.
JPrevost is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 10:12 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by MrDude_1
no.. it wont.

and for all the arguing that the pro-TBI people will give for it... i dont have a exact reason why.


but my proof is, alot have tried, and noone has done it yet.
The reason why is that SD paired with a wetflow system is a pain to tune and alot of people put this, that, and the other on their cars with tbi and dont take the necesary steps to tune it. It runs horrible and they go off and spout that the tbi is absolute crap. SD is hard to tune. Its all emperical and based entirely on whats entered into the calibration for the motor. On top of that, the fueling is coupled very closely to the engine and even the timing your running. The ecm has no way, aside from the O2, to know what the engine needs. On top of this, the stock tables are crap. Theres very little timing and you can rest assured that the VE table will be off.

All the same things apply to the later model SD tpis, and on top of that you have all the resonance problems. There have been quite a few duds that had tpi on top of them as well. One that comes to mind is a guy that was running an old school flat tappet and he could barely break 200 HP with it because the cam and tpi intake where so mismatched. There was also a guy who switched over to a SD tpi and ran just as slow as he did with the tbi because it wasnt tuned.

You have an LS1 with MAF so you can take it for granted that the pcm will be able to fuel the motor even when its modded. There is a SD part (VE tables, etc.) to the system as well, but it doesnt seem to be as sensitive as the older straight SD systems. I can tell you first hand that a MAF takes alot of the difficulty out of tuning. Not only is there just a few variables controlling the fueling, namely the MAF, but the maf doesnt give a damn what kind of motor is parked behind it. It just reports the flow to the ecm and the ecm meters out the fueling. Simple as that. Of course, any sort of intake change will throw the calibration straight to hell, especially with a dual system like what the late model LS1s use. Some guys change their airboxes and get so frustrated that they contemplate going straight SD because they cant get the MAF to cooperate. Shows that there really is no perfect system Lets not even talk about what happens when they descreen them.

With SD it takes some knowledge to get the system to run well. People have showed that they can run very well. I was never really that good at it, so I whipped up my own system using the stock tbi and ecm along with an LS1 MAF. Gave my tbi the ease of use of a 650 carb, only I dont have all that stuff that normally comes along with a carb, like difficulty starting in cold weather. After a few tweaks, and some new parts to replace the tired stock stuff, it runs as good as my old L98. Not only that but unlike the pontiac it doesnt weight nearly two tons so its probably slightly faster.

If you wanted a reason, thats the best one in my honest opionion. The tbi ecm is arguably the hardest to tune of the lot. The tbi itself is fine and theres no reason it shouldnt be. After all, like a carb or the tpi it lets in air and squirts in fuel. The real problem is that you have to do the EFI tuning boogie to get the right ammount of fuel into the motor.

Last edited by dimented24x7; 03-20-2005 at 10:18 PM.
dimented24x7 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 08:53 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by dimented24x7
The reason why is that SD paired with a wetflow system is a pain to tune and alot of people put this, that, and the other on their cars with tbi and dont take the necesary steps to tune it. It runs horrible and they go off and spout that the tbi is absolute crap. SD is hard to tune. Its all emperical and based entirely on whats entered into the calibration for the motor. On top of that, the fueling is coupled very closely to the engine and even the timing your running. The ecm has no way, aside from the O2, to know what the engine needs. On top of this, the stock tables are crap. Theres very little timing and you can rest assured that the VE table will be off.

All the same things apply to the later model SD tpis, and on top of that you have all the resonance problems. There have been quite a few duds that had tpi on top of them as well. One that comes to mind is a guy that was running an old school flat tappet and he could barely break 200 HP with it because the cam and tpi intake where so mismatched. There was also a guy who switched over to a SD tpi and ran just as slow as he did with the tbi because it wasnt tuned.

You have an LS1 with MAF so you can take it for granted that the pcm will be able to fuel the motor even when its modded. There is a SD part (VE tables, etc.) to the system as well, but it doesnt seem to be as sensitive as the older straight SD systems. I can tell you first hand that a MAF takes alot of the difficulty out of tuning. Not only is there just a few variables controlling the fueling, namely the MAF, but the maf doesnt give a damn what kind of motor is parked behind it. It just reports the flow to the ecm and the ecm meters out the fueling. Simple as that. Of course, any sort of intake change will throw the calibration straight to hell, especially with a dual system like what the late model LS1s use. Some guys change their airboxes and get so frustrated that they contemplate going straight SD because they cant get the MAF to cooperate. Shows that there really is no perfect system Lets not even talk about what happens when they descreen them.

With SD it takes some knowledge to get the system to run well. People have showed that they can run very well. I was never really that good at it, so I whipped up my own system using the stock tbi and ecm along with an LS1 MAF. Gave my tbi the ease of use of a 650 carb, only I dont have all that stuff that normally comes along with a carb, like difficulty starting in cold weather. After a few tweaks, and some new parts to replace the tired stock stuff, it runs as good as my old L98. Not only that but unlike the pontiac it doesnt weight nearly two tons so its probably slightly faster.

If you wanted a reason, thats the best one in my honest opionion. The tbi ecm is arguably the hardest to tune of the lot. The tbi itself is fine and theres no reason it shouldnt be. After all, like a carb or the tpi it lets in air and squirts in fuel. The real problem is that you have to do the EFI tuning boogie to get the right ammount of fuel into the motor.
thats probly the most accurate statement ive heard for TBI tuning....
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 01:26 PM
  #27  
Member

 
TPI-454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans-Am
Engine: 454-Motown SBC w/HSR
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by dimented24x7You have an LS1 with MAF so you can take it for granted that the pcm will be able to fuel the motor even when its modded. There is a SD part (VE tables, etc.) to the system as well, but it doesnt seem to be as sensitive as the older straight SD systems. I can tell you first hand that a MAF takes alot of the difficulty out of tuning. Not only is there just a few variables controlling the fueling, namely the MAF, but the maf doesnt give a damn what kind of motor is parked behind it. It just reports the flow to the ecm and the ecm meters out the fueling. Simple as that. Of course, any sort of intake change will throw the calibration straight to hell, especially with a dual system like what the late model LS1s use. Some guys change their airboxes and get so frustrated that they contemplate going straight SD because they cant get the MAF to cooperate. Shows that there really is no perfect system Lets not even talk about what happens when they descreen them.
Excellent explanation!

Originally posted by dimented24x788 Camaro SC on its way to rusting out. DIY hybrid MAF/MAP tbi fuel system, LS1 MAF with 3.5" intake and carb hat, home rebuilt 700-R4 with 2000 stall converter, 9-bolt rear with pbr brakes, and some junk bolt-ons.
D-24×7, do you have a picture of this creation you can share?
TPI-454 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 05:41 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Heres what it looks like now. You can sort of see the MAF in teh background.
Attached Thumbnails fastest times with tbi-c-documents-settings-terminal  
dimented24x7 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 05:52 PM
  #29  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Of course, now that Ive got it running good Im getting ready to tear it all back apart. Ive been harping alot about the MAF and I think that, for me at least, the system as a whole is a perfect blend of everything efi. The ultimate test will be if it just starts right up and runs well after a head swap. Im reserving my final opinion on it untill that moment.

I doubt the vortec heads alone will turn any record breaking times, but with the weenie stock type cam (204/214 .420/.442) it should make for a good 0-60 car that can beat most stuff off the line.
Attached Thumbnails fastest times with tbi-c-documents-settings-terminal  
dimented24x7 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:02 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
jbqualls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2001 Z28 camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I have a 305 TBI in my otherwise stock car, 92 rs, and I can easily outrun a stock LS1 fbody. I dont have times or numbers yet, but I also own a stock 98 LS1 Camaro that cant come cloe to keeping up.
jbqualls is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:41 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
BronYrAur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Yeah ok buddy
BronYrAur is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:45 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
 
jbqualls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2001 Z28 camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
It's stroked, 335, World heads, 10.1 KB pistons, Very large cam, Bigger injectors, Bigger TBI, Fuel pump, custom prom, and the list goes on....the 92 is a 5 speed and the 98 is an automatic...
jbqualls is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:47 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
 
jbqualls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2001 Z28 camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I built that engine with every possibly goodie just to prove everyone wrong that says dont go with the 305 or tbi, and I did a damn good job...
jbqualls is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:49 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
BronYrAur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Well when you say an otherwise stock 305 TBI 92 RS that doesn't mean a 10:1 335 stroker. What are the specs on the cam, did you tune the PROM yourself? Got any timeslips?
BronYrAur is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:53 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
jbqualls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2001 Z28 camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I meant the car was stock...stock rear end, transmission and such...480 lift intake and exhaust...i forgot the other specs, i could looks them up,
jbqualls is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:55 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
 
jbqualls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2001 Z28 camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
the track hasnt opened yet here, so i'm not sure of any times, would love to know though, assuming I can get traction...
jbqualls is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 06:58 PM
  #37  
Member

 
TPI-454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans-Am
Engine: 454-Motown SBC w/HSR
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by dimented24x7Heres what it looks like now. You can sort of see the MAF in teh background.
D-24×7, did you ever consider an air induction set-up to that of a Tuned Port Injected Camaro? Having the intake running straight towards the front, splitting, and fabbing up a ram-air effect from underneath the nose?

Off topic question.... what do you think about the Weiand Stealth intake (either EGR, or Non-EGR) for a TBI system, with the World 305 heads? Have you any experience with this particular manifold?
TPI-454 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 07:02 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
 
jbqualls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2001 Z28 camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I'm actually looking at manifolds right now...I want the World Products Motown manifold, but 280 is a little rich for me right now. I'm gonna settle for a holley street dominator...although I've heard the single plenum works well with the tbi...
jbqualls is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 11:27 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
I havnt had any experience with the stealth directly, but from their specs it looks like a decent dual plane. I got the edelcrap because it was cheap, it fits, and Im not going to be using a large cam due to the TC, the way the trans is set up, and the 2.77 rear gears.
dimented24x7 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 11:33 PM
  #40  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by TPI-454
D-24×7, did you ever consider an air induction set-up to that of a Tuned Port Injected Camaro? Having the intake running straight towards the front, splitting, and fabbing up a ram-air effect from underneath the nose?
I thought about that, but running a 3.5" section of pipe and just a filter is alot easier and required less fabrication. Id like to set something like that up, though. Also, theres virtually zero clearance in front of the tbi so having the MAF face forward would be difficult. In addition to that, the fuel tends to splash around alot near the tbi so the farther the MAF is from the tbi, the better. If it where too close, the MAF would accumulate varnish, which would definatly not be good.
dimented24x7 is offline  
Old 03-22-2005, 09:52 AM
  #41  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
who provided the "bonnet" over the TB? i have a clearance issue. i need 1/4 inch clearance above the injector pod and i have about another 1/2 inch above the pod to the hood. i would like a cold air kit but could not find a combo that worked. i bought a TBI truck cold air kit but hood would not close. bonnet tto high. now i have a spacer on TB and a drop AC with a 14x 2 inch round AC. need to clear throttle arm on TB so the spacer needed. i think it is choking engine however my A/F is 13.5 on the WB? KN says flow insufficient for a 350 cid at 5700 rpms. only had a couple weeks to play with it. procharger has 3 diff height "bonnets" (2.00/2.75.3.75) but the $$$$ are too much. $180? that i could adapt to a vette SLP ram air system off ebay. thinking of a custom bonnet. it appears procharger uses a 3.75 inch dia inlet tube! maybe overkill? custom fab needed.
Ronny is offline  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:38 AM
  #42  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dimented24x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
It was from, I think, superior airflow technologies. It was a closeout item so its no longer available now. They have aluminum ones like it but theyre expensive, and they have a partition in them which would be damn near impossible to cut out. With the resin/nylon one the two halves seperated so I was able to remove teh partition with a heated cutting tip.
dimented24x7 is offline  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:44 AM
  #43  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
thanks. i obtained the specific clearances from procharger. all i need to do is measure my existing setup and compare. it is more than a dome over TB. it directs the air up and over TB so that the path of air flow is verticle past the inj rather than sliding over edge of TB. odds are it wont fit anyway. i was lucky to find anything that will fit. tight squeeze.
Ronny is offline  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:22 PM
  #44  
Member
 
91RedFirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: t-56
Look what I have sitting around 1 caddy tbi air intake, send me a pm and you can have it for what ever shipping is.
Attached Thumbnails fastest times with tbi-c-program-files-veo  
91RedFirebird is offline  
Old 03-23-2005, 06:21 AM
  #45  
Member

 
TPI-454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans-Am
Engine: 454-Motown SBC w/HSR
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by dimented24x7.Id like to set something like that up, though. Also, theres virtually zero clearance in front of the tbi so having the MAF face forward would be difficult. In addition to that, the fuel tends to splash around alot near the tbi so the farther the MAF is from the tbi, the better. If it where too close, the MAF would accumulate varnish, which would definatly not be good.
Something like this;

Click Here
TPI-454 is offline  
Old 03-23-2005, 06:33 AM
  #46  
Member

 
TPI-454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans-Am
Engine: 454-Motown SBC w/HSR
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by dimented24x7.I havnt had any experience with the stealth directly, but from their specs it looks like a decent dual plane. I got the edelcrap because it was cheap, it fits, and Im not going to be using a large cam due to the TC, the way the trans is set up, and the 2.77 rear gears.
Yeah... the Stealth's have been around forever, but I too never had any experience with them. What's been grabbing my attention about them is their idle-7000 RPM power-band.

Now, you already installed you're Walbro right. I'd like to see you're set-up with the Stealth... along with some fabricated injector bosses (now running eight injectors) , and you're TB converted to a dry one by utilizing a block off plate.

The two biggest problems would be the fuel rail (in which I have a stock TPI one lying around, after my Stealth Ram install... which is your's if you consider this), and the injector bosses.
Couple the above with that CAI, and that would be some serious set-up! You sound like you're already well versed with PROM tuning, so that should be a breeze...
TPI-454 is offline  
Old 03-24-2005, 11:43 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
ezrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mountain Top, PA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 RS, 00 SS
Engine: 305TBI, 393LS1
Transmission: 700R4, T56S3
Id love to keep my TBI setup, but it seems like it is very hard to get good tuning, when all is said and done. So I keep reading how tuning is very important, obviously it is, but how do you go about getting the tuning right? I really do not have a ton of confidence in mail-order and it seems like a major pain and hit or miss process to do it yourself.

I guess I ask myself why go through the trouble when I dont see very much in the line of sucess stories for the TBI setup but see tons for carb or pretty much any other option.
ezrs is offline  
Old 03-24-2005, 12:04 PM
  #48  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
91 red firebird

Quote Look what I have sitting around 1 caddy tbi air intake, send me a pm and you can have it for what ever shipping is.

i sent you an email. did you receive it?
Ronny is offline  
Old 03-24-2005, 12:24 PM
  #49  
Supreme Member

 
IROCaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cypress,Tx
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by ezrs
Id love to keep my TBI setup, but it seems like it is very hard to get good tuning, when all is said and done. So I keep reading how tuning is very important, obviously it is, but how do you go about getting the tuning right? I really do not have a ton of confidence in mail-order and it seems like a major pain and hit or miss process to do it yourself.

I guess I ask myself why go through the trouble when I dont see very much in the line of sucess stories for the TBI setup but see tons for carb or pretty much any other option.
The answer is you have to do it yourself. The only way to really get tbi dialed in is to do your own chips over and over again. Which is the reason I went carb and will never even consider modifying another tbi vehicle. Some guys on here are willing to do it and have had success, and thats good, but look at the other 90% of guys who are running 15+ second quarter mile times and it kind of gives you an idea of what your up against. It takes a special breed of man to do alot of modifications to tbi and stick with it.
IROCaholic is offline  
Old 03-24-2005, 12:26 PM
  #50  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (1)
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ronny is offline  


Quick Reply: fastest times with tbi



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.