so we know 2 LT1 cams with .450 lift i/e and one LT1 with .450/460 i/e.
How would that compare wiht a peanut cam with 1.6 ratio rockers.


------------------
-Tas
'89 Formula WS-6
[soon to be Torch Red with black hood and headlights =) ]

305, TBI, auto, 14x3 chrome flat based open element with K&N, Milodon 160* thermo, functional Formula hood, cross-flow Flowmaster, '99z28 rear pipes and tips....

Super GRK_Taz World
EFI & Intake Options
AOL IM: superGRtaz
ICQ 82881207

 

Peanut Cam with 1.6 = .373/.410 and the duration is little better than the stock 179/194. I think the LT4 cam will make more power.

 

brent is right. the 1.6's made a big difference, but there is no way to fake actually having a good cam.

lata
tim

------------------
91 Camaro RS-LO3,Auto.
14.301 @ 94.39mph

Check Out The East Coast F-Body Nationals Home Page
www.geocities.com/njspeeder

My MAFB.ORG Home Page
www.mycar.net/mafb/registry/detail.cfm?id=299

DSI Racing Home Page

www.geocities.com/foff667

 

omg thats still low! Only .337/.410?
Yikes, wonder if it's worth it.....

------------------
Dare to be different-
build a 305! <gasp!>