1988 T5 305 O2 Sensor Problem
#1
1988 T5 305 O2 Sensor Problem
Background info - Stock 305 with Heddman headers and midpipe, installed Michigan Motorsports TBI heated O2 sensor adaptor. Power is coming from the additional ignition-on ports on the fuse block and it is grounded on the fender. Drove the car for about a month then the power wire came loose under the pedal and was crushed by the clutch and shorted. I replaced the wire, and started experiencing bogging under load when in closed loop. I tried replacing the entire adaptor and O2 sensor with the same model as well as another brand to no avail. I borrowed my friends diagnostic tool and took a ride to see that the brand new O2 sensor was reading under 100mV when I am experiencing the bogging. These sensors are supposed to operate within 100mV and 900mV. I have attached a pic of the diagnostic tool when the car is bogging. I'm not sure where to go from here, can anyone give me any advice?
#2
Re: 1988 T5 305 O2 Sensor Problem
O2 sensor is showing WAY lean.
Question is whether this is real, or false information.
Short- and long-term fuel trim numbers are both neutral (128) so overall the computer thinks the fuel trim is good under this driving condition.
I don't understand why you need to add a heated O2 sensor, when GM thinks the non-heated unit is going to work just fine. Where does Heddman put the O2 bung?
Question is whether this is real, or false information.
Short- and long-term fuel trim numbers are both neutral (128) so overall the computer thinks the fuel trim is good under this driving condition.
I don't understand why you need to add a heated O2 sensor, when GM thinks the non-heated unit is going to work just fine. Where does Heddman put the O2 bung?
#3
Re: 1988 T5 305 O2 Sensor Problem
O2 sensor is showing WAY lean.
Question is whether this is real, or false information.
Short- and long-term fuel trim numbers are both neutral (128) so overall the computer thinks the fuel trim is good under this driving condition.
I don't understand why you need to add a heated O2 sensor, when GM thinks the non-heated unit is going to work just fine. Where does Heddman put the O2 bung?
Question is whether this is real, or false information.
Short- and long-term fuel trim numbers are both neutral (128) so overall the computer thinks the fuel trim is good under this driving condition.
I don't understand why you need to add a heated O2 sensor, when GM thinks the non-heated unit is going to work just fine. Where does Heddman put the O2 bung?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uc360
Engine Swap
3
04-28-2008 01:57 PM
fitbmxseries1
Electronics
2
09-17-2005 10:56 PM
86TpiTransAm
Tech / General Engine
14
11-17-2001 12:50 PM