How does this lookk, heads off, pics inside
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
How does this lookk, heads off, pics inside
Here are some pics, any comments, as in anything look bad?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
to me that looks like your running rich or the rings arent sealing very good...the first pics of the chambers....the first cylinder on the left looks like its a little lean but the next 3 look about normal...but the 2nd pic with the pistons looks a little rough...
how do your plugs look?
how do your plugs look?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Well, most plugs look ok, but one looked like it wasn't even firing, I'd say 75% of it looked clean, with a tad of black. But I'm not sure if that was the cylinder it was off of. My ignition is pretty new, new wires, 12k miles on dist, plugs had about 5k miles on em.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by KNTA4DNU
Is it possible coolant was leaking into that cylnder? That can clean your parts!
Is it possible coolant was leaking into that cylnder? That can clean your parts!
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
Shouldn't have been, though some may have gotten in there when the heads were pulled off, tried not to let any.
Shouldn't have been, though some may have gotten in there when the heads were pulled off, tried not to let any.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by RB83L69
That #1 or #8 (far left in the 1st pic) was getting water in it.
The rest look perfectly normal.
That #1 or #8 (far left in the 1st pic) was getting water in it.
The rest look perfectly normal.
Water huh, was this due to a bad head gasket? Would any performance be lost because of this. Any piston damage?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Greenville S.C.
Car: 87 Grand National
Engine: 3.8 SFI Turbo
Transmission: BRF 200R4
looks like water got to your cylinder like mentioned above (hence the valves looking so clean. It could have been a blown head gasket. As for performance......maybe so, especially since you would have compression bleedoff as a by product. Pistons will be fine. Does that piston look clean also?? most likely will.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by No4NJunk
looks like water got to your cylinder like mentioned above (hence the valves looking so clean. It could have been a blown head gasket. As for performance......maybe so, especially since you would have compression bleedoff as a by product. Pistons will be fine. Does that piston look clean also?? most likely will.
looks like water got to your cylinder like mentioned above (hence the valves looking so clean. It could have been a blown head gasket. As for performance......maybe so, especially since you would have compression bleedoff as a by product. Pistons will be fine. Does that piston look clean also?? most likely will.
Hmm, not sure, I'll have my bro take a look, I'm back at college, I thought they were all dark, not clean.
Oh,if water was getting in, wouldn't antifreeze, causing smoke? I got no smoke??
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento,Ca.
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 355 C.I.
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Coolant leaking/seaping into that cylinder is correct. Besure to have the heads Mag checked for cracks. Those are the light weight casting cylinder heads. They have a reputation for cracking...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by 90Formula-X-F
Coolant leaking/seaping into that cylinder is correct. Besure to have the heads Mag checked for cracks. Those are the light weight casting cylinder heads. They have a reputation for cracking...
Coolant leaking/seaping into that cylinder is correct. Besure to have the heads Mag checked for cracks. Those are the light weight casting cylinder heads. They have a reputation for cracking...
coolant leak
Yeah coolant leak it luteraly steam cleans the chamber like the picture. I t doesnt take much coolant to do it either. Did you ever notice the slightest hesitation any time but intermittent, well this is the cause. More than likely you might want to have the heads shave for an true surface.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: coolant leak
Originally posted by radiateu2
Yeah coolant leak it luteraly steam cleans the chamber like the picture. I t doesnt take much coolant to do it either. Did you ever notice the slightest hesitation any time but intermittent, well this is the cause. More than likely you might want to have the heads shave for an true surface.
Yeah coolant leak it luteraly steam cleans the chamber like the picture. I t doesnt take much coolant to do it either. Did you ever notice the slightest hesitation any time but intermittent, well this is the cause. More than likely you might want to have the heads shave for an true surface.
hey Mark
I know the feeling I have a 1993 Mercury Cougar with the 3.8 v-6 always hesitated when taking off then oneday she crapped out your lucky I had to have the heads milled. I know I know its a FORD but the same principle apply water fuel and spark dont mix. I bet your ET's and 0-60 will be much better running on and not seven when she is fixed
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: hey Mark
Originally posted by radiateu2
I know the feeling I have a 1993 Mercury Cougar with the 3.8 v-6 always hesitated when taking off then oneday she crapped out your lucky I had to have the heads milled. I know I know its a FORD but the same principle apply water fuel and spark dont mix. I bet your ET's and 0-60 will be much better running on and not seven when she is fixed
I know the feeling I have a 1993 Mercury Cougar with the 3.8 v-6 always hesitated when taking off then oneday she crapped out your lucky I had to have the heads milled. I know I know its a FORD but the same principle apply water fuel and spark dont mix. I bet your ET's and 0-60 will be much better running on and not seven when she is fixed
Oh, and I own a Ford too, nothin wrong with it, 90 Stang 30mpg.
makes modding the IROC possible.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Mark, how many miles have you put on that engine?
If I remember correctly its fairly new, but it seems like you got alot of carbon build up on the pistons.
If I remember correctly its fairly new, but it seems like you got alot of carbon build up on the pistons.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by SSC
Mark, how many miles have you put on that engine?
If I remember correctly its fairly new, but it seems like you got alot of carbon build up on the pistons.
Mark, how many miles have you put on that engine?
If I remember correctly its fairly new, but it seems like you got alot of carbon build up on the pistons.
running real rich
Man Mark that is a lot of Carbon for 12K I took my 305 with over 100,000 and it didnt look that bad. You very well could of had a carb problem as well.
The gas is still nasty there lol
The gas is still nasty there lol
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
That wasn't a water leak. That was just the only one that was burning half good. the rest are way too rich.
When you get a water leak that cylinder will be real clean.
that is nothing. Inspect your head gasket. If there was a problem you will see it.
Did you ever overheat the motor?
Mark how thick is the head gasket? Rotate the motor to bring the piston to the top (TDC) and see how far down the piston is in the bore.
Were going to have to help ya tune a carb, cause that is real rich.
When you get a water leak that cylinder will be real clean.
that is nothing. Inspect your head gasket. If there was a problem you will see it.
Did you ever overheat the motor?
Mark how thick is the head gasket? Rotate the motor to bring the piston to the top (TDC) and see how far down the piston is in the bore.
Were going to have to help ya tune a carb, cause that is real rich.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
When I first got the motor within the first 2k miles or so, the motor did run rather warm a few times it got to 240*.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
When I first got the motor within the first 2k miles or so, the motor did run rather warm a few times it got to 240*.
When I first got the motor within the first 2k miles or so, the motor did run rather warm a few times it got to 240*.
have trouble with factory head gaskets ........
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
Gees Eh 240*.... And any wonder why SOME PEOPLE
have trouble with factory head gaskets ........
Gees Eh 240*.... And any wonder why SOME PEOPLE
have trouble with factory head gaskets ........
yeah, I didn't like it runnin that hot either, I later found out it was due to my small crank pulley I had on there.
I was burning oil in my car due to o-rings starting to give on the pistons, but when I pulled the heads, they didn't look that bad. Yeah some carbon build up, but not sludge thick.
From my guess is you were running rich. The others look steam cleaned. Steam cleaning does wonders. I use that concept to clean my headers if I spill oil on them, I get them real hot then spray with some light water, instant steam and instant clean...
From my guess is you were running rich. The others look steam cleaned. Steam cleaning does wonders. I use that concept to clean my headers if I spill oil on them, I get them real hot then spray with some light water, instant steam and instant clean...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Well, that one may look worse, because I took those pics after WD-40 was sprayed into the cylinder.
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Hey Mark,
Why are you going with a DP carb? Aren't you supposed to get a VS carb with an automatic tranny and DP with a manual? I know you have an auto because I remember you have the B&M T-handled autoshifter.
EDIT: I made 100 posts today!
Why are you going with a DP carb? Aren't you supposed to get a VS carb with an automatic tranny and DP with a manual? I know you have an auto because I remember you have the B&M T-handled autoshifter.
EDIT: I made 100 posts today!
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by rezinn
Hey Mark, tell your brother to drain the coolant before he removes stuff, that way it won't drain into your lifter valley and oil pan
Hey Mark, tell your brother to drain the coolant before he removes stuff, that way it won't drain into your lifter valley and oil pan
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by MuttandJeff
Hey Mark,
Why are you going with a DP carb? Aren't you supposed to get a VS carb with an automatic tranny and DP with a manual? I know you have an auto because I remember you have the B&M T-handled autoshifter.
EDIT: I made 100 posts today!
Hey Mark,
Why are you going with a DP carb? Aren't you supposed to get a VS carb with an automatic tranny and DP with a manual? I know you have an auto because I remember you have the B&M T-handled autoshifter.
EDIT: I made 100 posts today!
And others have told me the same on here.
Ive talked to some people and they say double pumpers work great with automatics....
Mark...my 305 with 113k looked a tad worse than that....pull a valve and see how much buildup is on there because your motor looks pretty nasty for 12k miles.
You need to figure out whats up with that motor mark....16 second quater on an engine that supposedly comes with 250hp + the cam...check your cat maybe its fried?
Mark...my 305 with 113k looked a tad worse than that....pull a valve and see how much buildup is on there because your motor looks pretty nasty for 12k miles.
You need to figure out whats up with that motor mark....16 second quater on an engine that supposedly comes with 250hp + the cam...check your cat maybe its fried?
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
I was just wondering, since everyone on the carb boards and the tech articles say that for autos you should use the vacuum secondary carb and for manuals to use mech. secondaries.
I guess that's more for swappers who are switching from FI to carb and have no experience with driving carb motors.
I guess that's more for swappers who are switching from FI to carb and have no experience with driving carb motors.
Last edited by MuttandJeff; Oct 21, 2002 at 01:50 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by MuttandJeff
I was just wondering, since everyone on the carb boards and the tech articles say that for autos you should use the vacuum secondary carb and for manuals to use mech. secondaries.
I guess that's more for swappers who are switching from FI to carb and have no experience with driving carb motors.
I was just wondering, since everyone on the carb boards and the tech articles say that for autos you should use the vacuum secondary carb and for manuals to use mech. secondaries.
I guess that's more for swappers who are switching from FI to carb and have no experience with driving carb motors.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by TBI305Camaro
Ive talked to some people and they say double pumpers work great with automatics....
Mark...my 305 with 113k looked a tad worse than that....pull a valve and see how much buildup is on there because your motor looks pretty nasty for 12k miles.
You need to figure out whats up with that motor mark....16 second quater on an engine that supposedly comes with 250hp + the cam...check your cat maybe its fried?
Ive talked to some people and they say double pumpers work great with automatics....
Mark...my 305 with 113k looked a tad worse than that....pull a valve and see how much buildup is on there because your motor looks pretty nasty for 12k miles.
You need to figure out whats up with that motor mark....16 second quater on an engine that supposedly comes with 250hp + the cam...check your cat maybe its fried?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
0
Aug 20, 2015 03:11 PM






