Who the highest?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Who the highest?
Who is running the highest dynamic compression ratio (DCR) on pump gas 93 or 92 octane?
I am thing of building a 383 with KB -7cc pistons. Zero deck height, a .040" 4.06" copper gasket and PROTOPLINE 64cc heads, i haven't actually measure the chamber size yet. I will be using a comp solid roller XR274-12R cam with 274, 280, ground on 112, 108.
I calculate a 8.696 DCR, which is pretty damn high!!
Should i build it with different pistons?
I think i might do some valve unshrouding to open the chamber to 67cc or so. But i don't really want to grind on my new heads just yet!!
I am thing of building a 383 with KB -7cc pistons. Zero deck height, a .040" 4.06" copper gasket and PROTOPLINE 64cc heads, i haven't actually measure the chamber size yet. I will be using a comp solid roller XR274-12R cam with 274, 280, ground on 112, 108.
I calculate a 8.696 DCR, which is pretty damn high!!
Should i build it with different pistons?
I think i might do some valve unshrouding to open the chamber to 67cc or so. But i don't really want to grind on my new heads just yet!!
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
That is cutting it close. I hope your talking about alumium heads.
All this "dynamic compression" is really a bunch of whooy.
Why buy into the " cam it big and you can run more compression."
An efficient motor with less compression will make more power than a over cammed, less efficient motor with maxed out compression.
Think about it. An efficient motor with good volumetric efficiency will pack a lot of air in the cylinder. It will not tolerate as much compression as a inefficient motor say with a head that flows a lot less but with the same camshaft. Or an under sized carb.
You can't compare your motor to someone elses.
It is bad/ risky engineering to try to get the absolute
most compression out of it 'cause the conditions that you'll be useing it under will change. ( weather, operating temperature,
carbon buildup Air inlet tempeture and density, available fuel octane quality etc)
I'd get it down to 10.4:1 or less for alumium heads and 92/93 octane gas.
Opening up the chambers with a little valve unshrouding
and polishing will get the compression ratio to a useable
level and help low lift flow a little.
Just my .02....
All this "dynamic compression" is really a bunch of whooy.
Why buy into the " cam it big and you can run more compression."
An efficient motor with less compression will make more power than a over cammed, less efficient motor with maxed out compression.
Think about it. An efficient motor with good volumetric efficiency will pack a lot of air in the cylinder. It will not tolerate as much compression as a inefficient motor say with a head that flows a lot less but with the same camshaft. Or an under sized carb.
You can't compare your motor to someone elses.
It is bad/ risky engineering to try to get the absolute
most compression out of it 'cause the conditions that you'll be useing it under will change. ( weather, operating temperature,
carbon buildup Air inlet tempeture and density, available fuel octane quality etc)
I'd get it down to 10.4:1 or less for alumium heads and 92/93 octane gas.
Opening up the chambers with a little valve unshrouding
and polishing will get the compression ratio to a useable
level and help low lift flow a little.
Just my .02....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERIC'86IROC
Tech / General Engine
1
Nov 21, 2000 02:51 PM





