Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Piston to valve clearance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2001 | 12:11 PM
  #1  
RCR's Avatar
RCR
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: Shelby Twp., Mi., USA
Car: '84 Fiero ('01 GA interior)
Engine: '96 4.0 Aurora
Transmission: '96 4T80E
Piston to valve clearance?

What is a safe pissston to valve clearance on a street motor? I have to decide whether to go with 1.6 or 1.5 rockers on my G1 TW heads and LT4 Hot cam. Using the stock stamped arms and some Playdoh, I measured .075 on the intake and .065 on the exaust. Going to 1.6 rockers should decrease that by .033. So, what is safe?

thanx,
Bob

------------------
Bob '89 Formula CC350
Last(lost)Member of the Elusive Great Lakes Crew
My car's homepage
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2001 | 12:22 PM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yikes!

Too close for me already. .100 is a good number to be on the safe side. You can run closer but its also taking chances. I would definitely stay away from the 1.6's unless you have the pistons cut.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2001 | 01:59 PM
  #3  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
That's too close for comfort. Get the pistons fly-cut. The stock rockers have so much lost motion from bending and from their ratio never being 1.5 anyway that if you put a set of something decent on there, even at 1.5, you'd probably already be in the negative clearance area.

With that much money tied up in heads, it would be senseless to void most of their benefits by nutting the cam. Definitely get the pistons cut. .100" is the absolute minimum, and I'd run it that close only if you have a rev limiter; otherwise, shoot for .125".

------------------
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
ICON Motorsports
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2001 | 04:45 PM
  #4  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,675
Likes: 314
RCR,

Did you take into account the compressed thickness of the head gasket? The extra 0.030" or so might be all you need to get a little more space and "safety factor".

If the gasket was in place or accounted for, you are really tight. I'd be afraid of lethal valve exposure at any kind of respectable RPM. Pumped-up hydraulic lifters would only make the situation worse, which is one of the reasons I like to skimp on the low side of lash adjustment on hydraulics. Another 0.050" from lifter filling could be disasterous. I certainly wouldn't consider higher ratio rockers without relieving the piston tops.

------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"No matter how hard you try you can't stop us now..."
Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2001 | 05:05 PM
  #5  
RCR's Avatar
RCR
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: Shelby Twp., Mi., USA
Car: '84 Fiero ('01 GA interior)
Engine: '96 4.0 Aurora
Transmission: '96 4T80E
Yeah, that's what I thought. Glad I didn't get the rockers yet. Yes, I did put the gasket in, unfortuneately. Looks like I need to look at some options. Thanx.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2001 | 05:08 PM
  #6  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
i try for .100 without the gasket, or something close to it. i'd be getting the pistons notched for sure on your set up.

------------------
ICON Motorsports

1st & 3rd
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:35 AM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
Sep 13, 2015 11:35 PM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.