So who ran full manifold vacuum?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
So who ran full manifold vacuum?
I was just informed that full manifold vacuum means that advance will fall away under part throttle acceleration. So who ever ran full manifold?
Guy who helped me build my engine was all about full manifold. He said thats how all the guys ran their cars in the 70's. That he never used ported.
Why was full manifold ever used then? How did they make up for the vacuum drop off for part throttle acceleration?
Guy who helped me build my engine was all about full manifold. He said thats how all the guys ran their cars in the 70's. That he never used ported.
Why was full manifold ever used then? How did they make up for the vacuum drop off for part throttle acceleration?
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton AB Canada
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 355 4 bbl
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.73 L/S
Spark advance will fall away under part throttle acceleration whether using manifold or ported vacuum.
The difference is at idle and throttle angles less than where ported vacuum comes on, straight manifold vacuum allows for more advance here.
Search for a recent posted article on this same topic, it includes the p/n for a vacuum can that pulls in full advance at only 8" vacuum.
The difference is at idle and throttle angles less than where ported vacuum comes on, straight manifold vacuum allows for more advance here.
Search for a recent posted article on this same topic, it includes the p/n for a vacuum can that pulls in full advance at only 8" vacuum.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM
NufNuffZ28
History / Originality
2
Aug 14, 2015 09:12 AM




