What's a 355?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio, USA
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305TPI stock
Transmission: TH700R stock
What's a 355?
I realize this is probably a stupid question to some people but i've never been able to find out so i thought i'd ask.
What's a 355?
Thanks.
What's a 355?
Thanks.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 574
Likes: 1
From: San Lorenzo, California
Car: 1987 Firebird Trans AM
Engine: 383 TPI...very soon
Transmission: TH700R4
A 355 is a rebuilt 350, typically bored .030 over, giving you a bore of 4.030", which with the 3.48" all adds up to roughly 355 Cubic Inches.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Bore x Bore x .7854 x Stroke x Number of Cylinders = Cubic Inch Displacment
4" x 4" x .7854 x 3.48" x 8 cylinders = 349.85 CID, rounded up to 350 CID
If the block is bored out .030", then the bore is now 4.030"
4.030" x 4.030" x .7854 x 3.48" x 8 cylinders = 355.12 CID, rounded down to 355 CID
4" x 4" x .7854 x 3.48" x 8 cylinders = 349.85 CID, rounded up to 350 CID
If the block is bored out .030", then the bore is now 4.030"
4.030" x 4.030" x .7854 x 3.48" x 8 cylinders = 355.12 CID, rounded down to 355 CID
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Yea, its just an over bored 350. I still don't really understand why people feel the need to call it a 355 and not a 350 though... all it is is a 350 with some block maintenace done to it.
Meh, whatever, lol. I'm just rambling.
Meh, whatever, lol. I'm just rambling.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 2
From: Lower Salford, PA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
It's also pi (3.141592654) x the bore radius squared x stroke x # of cylinders.
a SBC 350:
3.141592654 x 2 x 2 x 3.48 x 8 = 349.847759 cu. in.
a SBC 383:
3.141592654 x 2.015 x 2.015 x 3.75 x 8 = 382.667191 cu. in.
a SBC 350:
3.141592654 x 2 x 2 x 3.48 x 8 = 349.847759 cu. in.
a SBC 383:
3.141592654 x 2.015 x 2.015 x 3.75 x 8 = 382.667191 cu. in.
Last edited by Ricktpi; Apr 20, 2004 at 05:53 AM.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Car: '86 Z28
Engine: LB9 (305 TPI)
Transmission: 700R4 w/kit
well, you could figure out the exact formula by looking up how many CI go into 1 L... or you could do it the half-***/lazy way that i did it.
305 CI x n = 5.0 L we know that since a 305 is 5.0L (more/less)
divide 305 by both sides of the equation and you get the following value.
n= 0.016393 (rounded)
This means that if you multiply this number by the number of cubic inches, the result should be in Liters. But, since the 305 CI = 5.0L is rounded, this number is not exact. To make it closer you can use the same formula except substitute in different values for the volumes. I used 350 CI = 5.7L.
In this case n = 0.0162857 (rounded)
The average of these 2 numbers should theoretically be closer to the actual value.
the average is = 0.016339
Most of you probably dont care how i got the number, soooo to make a long post short...
C.I. x (0.016339) = Liters
Remember! This is an approximation, an estimate... not the actual formula. Although it should be pretty damn near it.
305 CI x n = 5.0 L we know that since a 305 is 5.0L (more/less)
divide 305 by both sides of the equation and you get the following value.
n= 0.016393 (rounded)
This means that if you multiply this number by the number of cubic inches, the result should be in Liters. But, since the 305 CI = 5.0L is rounded, this number is not exact. To make it closer you can use the same formula except substitute in different values for the volumes. I used 350 CI = 5.7L.
In this case n = 0.0162857 (rounded)
The average of these 2 numbers should theoretically be closer to the actual value.
the average is = 0.016339
Most of you probably dont care how i got the number, soooo to make a long post short...
C.I. x (0.016339) = Liters
Remember! This is an approximation, an estimate... not the actual formula. Although it should be pretty damn near it.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
61ci = 1 Liter
Divide engine CI by 61, and it will give you the size in Liters.
EX
427 / 61 = 7.0L
305 / 61 = 5.0L
Divide engine CI by 61, and it will give you the size in Liters.
EX
427 / 61 = 7.0L
305 / 61 = 5.0L
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Okay, without any rounding or "-ish's":
There are 2.54 centimeters per inch. Cube both of those, and you get 16.387064 cubic centimeters per cubic inch.
There are 1000 cubic centimeters per liter.
Do all that math, and you'll discover what is called a 350 (using 3.141592635898 for pi) is 5,733 cubic centimeters rounded to the nearest digit, or 5.733 liters.
Okay, what is it, really, with significant figures taken into account?
There are 2.54 centimeters per inch. Cube both of those, and you get 16.387064 cubic centimeters per cubic inch.
There are 1000 cubic centimeters per liter.
Do all that math, and you'll discover what is called a 350 (using 3.141592635898 for pi) is 5,733 cubic centimeters rounded to the nearest digit, or 5.733 liters.
Okay, what is it, really, with significant figures taken into account?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Originally posted by Air_Adam
Yea, its just an over bored 350. I still don't really understand why people feel the need to call it a 355 and not a 350 though... all it is is a 350 with some block maintenace done to it.
Meh, whatever, lol. I'm just rambling.
Yea, its just an over bored 350. I still don't really understand why people feel the need to call it a 355 and not a 350 though... all it is is a 350 with some block maintenace done to it.
Meh, whatever, lol. I'm just rambling.
I should have called my 305 a 310
(yes I rebuilt it before knowing how crappy it was)
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Air_Adam
Yea, its just an over bored 350. I still don't really understand why people feel the need to call it a 355 and not a 350 though... all it is is a 350 with some block maintenace done to it.
Meh, whatever, lol. I'm just rambling.
Yea, its just an over bored 350. I still don't really understand why people feel the need to call it a 355 and not a 350 though... all it is is a 350 with some block maintenace done to it.
Meh, whatever, lol. I'm just rambling.
because saying "350 with some block maintenace done to it." or "350 bored .30 over" is just too long.
btw, i have 408.7 ci (athough i dont call it a 409)
anyone want to guess what it is?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 2
From: winthrop harbor, il & plymouth, il
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: 383 sbc
Transmission: th-400
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 bolt/Detroit TrueTrac 4.
she's real fine my 409, my 4------0--------9! well i save my pennies and i save my dimes (giddy up giddy up 409)....
sorry your 409 statement just got me going. i am thinkin your 408 is destroked?? but if you were running a 408 mopar it would be from a 360 block that was stroked.
sorry your 409 statement just got me going. i am thinkin your 408 is destroked?? but if you were running a 408 mopar it would be from a 360 block that was stroked.
Last edited by spartyon; Apr 20, 2004 at 09:41 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by spartyon
she's real fine my 409, my 4------0--------9! well i save my pennies and i save my dimes (giddy up giddy up 409)....
sorry your 409 statement just got me going. i am thinkin your 408 is destroked?? but if you were running a 408 mopar it would be from a 360 block that was stroked.
she's real fine my 409, my 4------0--------9! well i save my pennies and i save my dimes (giddy up giddy up 409)....
sorry your 409 statement just got me going. i am thinkin your 408 is destroked?? but if you were running a 408 mopar it would be from a 360 block that was stroked.
but yea, if i said 409, everyone would think mopar.
and yes i have that song.
heh, i'll just post it... my first 400SBC was bored .40 over.. and yea i used to play the giddy up 409 song when i drove it because i thought it was funny...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
The 409 was a Chevrolet V8.... the old "W" block.... that block came in a 348 and a 409. Available from somewhere about 57 to about 64. Sorry I can't be certain what years they were; as some of you probably already know, the 2nd thing you lose when you get old is your memory, but I can't remember what the first thing is supposed to be.....
Anyway I gotta agree, this business that has recently become popular of referring to a motor with a maintenance overbore by using some other number other than what it is, is obnoxious. A 350 is a 350 no matter how many times it's been bored for maintenance. Special numbers (383, 434, etc.) should be reserved for totally non-factory configurations. Calling a 350 a "355" just because it's had its bores cleaned up is nothing but pure monkey-spank IMHO.
Anyway I gotta agree, this business that has recently become popular of referring to a motor with a maintenance overbore by using some other number other than what it is, is obnoxious. A 350 is a 350 no matter how many times it's been bored for maintenance. Special numbers (383, 434, etc.) should be reserved for totally non-factory configurations. Calling a 350 a "355" just because it's had its bores cleaned up is nothing but pure monkey-spank IMHO.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by RB83L69
The 409 was a Chevrolet V8.... the old "W" block.... that block came in a 348 and a 409. Available from somewhere about 57 to about 64. Sorry I can't be certain what years they were; as some of you probably already know, the 2nd thing you lose when you get old is your memory, but I can't remember what the first thing is supposed to be.....
Anyway I gotta agree, this business that has recently become popular of referring to a motor with a maintenance overbore by using some other number other than what it is, is obnoxious. A 350 is a 350 no matter how many times it's been bored for maintenance. Special numbers (383, 434, etc.) should be reserved for totally non-factory configurations. Calling a 350 a "355" just because it's had its bores cleaned up is nothing but pure monkey-spank IMHO.
The 409 was a Chevrolet V8.... the old "W" block.... that block came in a 348 and a 409. Available from somewhere about 57 to about 64. Sorry I can't be certain what years they were; as some of you probably already know, the 2nd thing you lose when you get old is your memory, but I can't remember what the first thing is supposed to be.....
Anyway I gotta agree, this business that has recently become popular of referring to a motor with a maintenance overbore by using some other number other than what it is, is obnoxious. A 350 is a 350 no matter how many times it's been bored for maintenance. Special numbers (383, 434, etc.) should be reserved for totally non-factory configurations. Calling a 350 a "355" just because it's had its bores cleaned up is nothing but pure monkey-spank IMHO.
i donno man...
ive seen you post the numbers 406 pretty often....
btw, yea they made a big block 409 but as i recall, they didnt badge it as such.. right? im not sure either, my memory is fuzzy about that too.... been awhile since i even thought about it...
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Because then I'd have to call the 396 a 401, and everyone would think it's a Pontiac...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Go look at a piston or a piston ring catalog.
You won't see a "355" or a "357" or a "360" application.
You'll see 350 +.030" or whatever.
The reason you can call it a 350, is because it's a 350. Even if it's had about the thickness of a business card taken off of the cyl walls to clean up wear and provide a new surface. It's a factory size, with some maintenance. The change in the cubic inches is insignificant.
Now a non-factory size, such as a 377 or 383 or 434, is a different matter. It didn't start out life as any of those things, so it's not meaningful to talk about it using the factory dimensions, since they don't apply to it any more.
Just MHO.
You won't see a "355" or a "357" or a "360" application.
You'll see 350 +.030" or whatever.
The reason you can call it a 350, is because it's a 350. Even if it's had about the thickness of a business card taken off of the cyl walls to clean up wear and provide a new surface. It's a factory size, with some maintenance. The change in the cubic inches is insignificant.
Now a non-factory size, such as a 377 or 383 or 434, is a different matter. It didn't start out life as any of those things, so it's not meaningful to talk about it using the factory dimensions, since they don't apply to it any more.
Just MHO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
codeysabatini
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Nov 10, 2015 04:07 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM






