small block 400 with TPI
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
small block 400 with TPI
has anyone done this,and if so, was it worth the build.
I would like to build a 400small block with vortec heads
and TPI induction. I know a 400 has plenty torq, but will it be
over kill useing a tpi set up, as they give lots of torqe also.
I would like to build a 400small block with vortec heads
and TPI induction. I know a 400 has plenty torq, but will it be
over kill useing a tpi set up, as they give lots of torqe also.
#2
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston / The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 ElCamino, looking for a 3rd gen
Engine: 305 TPI(427SB in progress) 730 $8D
Transmission: THM350 (Getting a 4L80E soon)
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt w/ 2.43 gears :(
The problem with the TPI on the 400 is that it will probably fall on its face after 4K+/- some RPM. As you mentioned it will work great for torque.
#3
TPI runners will probably be painfully restrictive on a 400 inch engine. You might make really good torque at very low RPMs, but power will fall off even faster (lower RPM) than most other TPI installations.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
400
Originally posted by eric305TPI
The problem with the TPI on the 400 is that it will probably fall on its face after 4K+/- some RPM. As you mentioned it will work great for torque.
The problem with the TPI on the 400 is that it will probably fall on its face after 4K+/- some RPM. As you mentioned it will work great for torque.
I guess there only great for carb style. If im
correct, the 400 needs lots of air to perform well
and the tpi does not help there.
#5
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston / The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 ElCamino, looking for a 3rd gen
Engine: 305 TPI(427SB in progress) 730 $8D
Transmission: THM350 (Getting a 4L80E soon)
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt w/ 2.43 gears :(
Stick a HSR or comparable intake on it with the right other parts(heads and valvetrain) and its a fun little engine.
Or stick a carb and matching intake on it.
Or stick a carb and matching intake on it.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
What do you mean what was the point of the SBC 400?? Not trying to be a dick, just asking. The purpose was to have more cubes than a SBC 350 I guess. Its just what it is. There was never a production 400 w/ TPI. The TPI was really designed for a motor more like a 305 from what I understand. It did alright on the 350, but it could still benefit from major intake mods.
A short runner FI setup on a 400 if you want to stay FI is the way to go. Something like a miniram, stealth ram or LT1 intake would feed it. A lot of guys run the carb though, b/c you can get a carb matched to what you need air wise for that big cubed motor...
A short runner FI setup on a 400 if you want to stay FI is the way to go. Something like a miniram, stealth ram or LT1 intake would feed it. A lot of guys run the carb though, b/c you can get a carb matched to what you need air wise for that big cubed motor...
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
400
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
What do you mean what was the point of the SBC 400?? Not trying to be a dick, just asking. The purpose was to have more cubes than a SBC 350 I guess. Its just what it is. There was never a production 400 w/ TPI. The TPI was really designed for a motor more like a 305 from what I understand. It did alright on the 350, but it could still benefit from major intake mods.
A short runner FI setup on a 400 if you want to stay FI is the way to go. Something like a miniram, stealth ram or LT1 intake would feed it. A lot of guys run the carb though, b/c you can get a carb matched to what you need air wise for that big cubed motor...
What do you mean what was the point of the SBC 400?? Not trying to be a dick, just asking. The purpose was to have more cubes than a SBC 350 I guess. Its just what it is. There was never a production 400 w/ TPI. The TPI was really designed for a motor more like a 305 from what I understand. It did alright on the 350, but it could still benefit from major intake mods.
A short runner FI setup on a 400 if you want to stay FI is the way to go. Something like a miniram, stealth ram or LT1 intake would feed it. A lot of guys run the carb though, b/c you can get a carb matched to what you need air wise for that big cubed motor...
in. I know they never made a TPI 400, cause production stoped in
the seventies im sure. you never really hear of a 400 build up!
whats the purpose of a 400? a good HP motor? really more
of a torqe motor? WHAT IS GOOD FROM A 400 to use it for.
350's are super commonly used.
Trending Topics
#8
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
The 400 wasn't every really meant to be a performance engine by GM. Most of them had around 8:1 compression, low-rise cast iron intake, 2bbl carb... in short, they were lame.
They do have great potential though, but not with TPI. With a TPI manifold, you'd make ungodly torque, but it would just hit a brick wall around 4000 rpm.
If you really wanna get the most out of it, you gotta use either a 4bbl carb, or an aftermarket EFI setup like a Stealth Ram or a Super Ram.
The 400, if built with the right induction system (ie. not TPI), can make huge amounts of HP and torque, and in a very streetable package too. There are quite a few 400s on this board making 400+hp and they are driven every day.
If you are looking for a 400, the best place to look (so i hear) are the '70s land yacts like Impalas, as well as trucks.
They do have great potential though, but not with TPI. With a TPI manifold, you'd make ungodly torque, but it would just hit a brick wall around 4000 rpm.
If you really wanna get the most out of it, you gotta use either a 4bbl carb, or an aftermarket EFI setup like a Stealth Ram or a Super Ram.
The 400, if built with the right induction system (ie. not TPI), can make huge amounts of HP and torque, and in a very streetable package too. There are quite a few 400s on this board making 400+hp and they are driven every day.
If you are looking for a 400, the best place to look (so i hear) are the '70s land yacts like Impalas, as well as trucks.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
I agree with Air_Adam - 400 was a smogger engine mainly for torque on large cars. They came in Caprices, trucks etc...
I just dropped my 400 in a few days ago. It dynoed at 490 ftlbs. at 3400 rpm's....with a carb. Hoping to have it running in a week or so.
TPI would choke it I think, unless you could hog out the ports somehow.....but then it wouldn't be "tuned" port injection anymore!!
I just dropped my 400 in a few days ago. It dynoed at 490 ftlbs. at 3400 rpm's....with a carb. Hoping to have it running in a week or so.
TPI would choke it I think, unless you could hog out the ports somehow.....but then it wouldn't be "tuned" port injection anymore!!
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
400
Originally posted by Air_Adam
If you are looking for a 400, the best place to look (so i hear) are the '70s land yacts like Impalas, as well as trucks. [/B]
If you are looking for a 400, the best place to look (so i hear) are the '70s land yacts like Impalas, as well as trucks. [/B]
I was hopeing fuel injection wise. I like how the TPI is not
so tall.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lower Salford, PA
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
1976 was the last year the 400 was used in the B body (Caprice/Impala). 1979 was the last year for trucks.
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
my uncle has TPI on two 400 engines.
i dont know where you guys are getting 4000 from.... it runs out of air around 2800 and falls totally on its face past 32..... if you wing it out to 4k to shift you would go slower in the 1/4
in short, it just doesnt flow enough air.
now a stealthram, LT1 intake or one of the other short runner/high flow setups work great.
i dont know where you guys are getting 4000 from.... it runs out of air around 2800 and falls totally on its face past 32..... if you wing it out to 4k to shift you would go slower in the 1/4
in short, it just doesnt flow enough air.
now a stealthram, LT1 intake or one of the other short runner/high flow setups work great.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Buckeye AZ
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
theres a guy on here by the name aziroc on the SW board whos got a 400 sbc with 399rwhp/436rwtq and a 200 shot using a TPI delivery system. its a good 12 sec car. if built properly a TPI system should perform good.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by AZCamaroPhreak
theres a guy on here by the name aziroc on the SW board whos got a 400 sbc with 399rwhp/436rwtq and a 200 shot using a TPI delivery system. its a good 12 sec car. if built properly a TPI system should perform good.
theres a guy on here by the name aziroc on the SW board whos got a 400 sbc with 399rwhp/436rwtq and a 200 shot using a TPI delivery system. its a good 12 sec car. if built properly a TPI system should perform good.
so he made a 12 second motor out of a 11 second motor? that doesnt seem right.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
400
I talked to terry at TPIS, and he said a miniram would
do the job well, and has plenty of torqe and hp for this size motor.
He also said, the miniram would let the 400 breath very well.
do the job well, and has plenty of torqe and hp for this size motor.
He also said, the miniram would let the 400 breath very well.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: 400
Originally posted by 81LT4
I talked to terry at TPIS, and he said a miniram would
do the job well, and has plenty of torqe and hp for this size motor.
He also said, the miniram would let the 400 breath very well.
I talked to terry at TPIS, and he said a miniram would
do the job well, and has plenty of torqe and hp for this size motor.
He also said, the miniram would let the 400 breath very well.
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
Re: Re: 400
Originally posted by Confuzed1
Yeah, I'd buy that. Your original question stated TPI, not a miniram....
Yeah, I'd buy that. Your original question stated TPI, not a miniram....
already have one. Looks like for the 400, I would have to
go with the mini ram, according to TPIS.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Re: Re: Re: 400
Originally posted by 81LT4
It was about the TPI, I wanted to use it cause i
already have one. Looks like for the 400, I would have to
go with the mini ram, according to TPIS.
It was about the TPI, I wanted to use it cause i
already have one. Looks like for the 400, I would have to
go with the mini ram, according to TPIS.
yes it will work great... but you have other options.
modified LT1 intake,and holley stealth ram are the first two to come to mind.
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HOUSTON TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: AUTOMATIC
DUDE, yes you are right, after I thought about it, for
$1200.00 with the rails, that is just to high for an intake.
A carb and intake would be way cheaper, with
the same or better performance. THANKS FOR ALL THE INPUT
$1200.00 with the rails, that is just to high for an intake.
A carb and intake would be way cheaper, with
the same or better performance. THANKS FOR ALL THE INPUT
#25
Originally posted by 406TPI
I HAD a 400 with TPI. I put on a super ram base SLP siamesed runners and a 58mm TB.....everything was ported to the max....the car completely fell on it's face at 4500rpm. Kinda disapponting...but being able to light both tires up at 40mph in 3rd gear was kinda neat.
I HAD a 400 with TPI. I put on a super ram base SLP siamesed runners and a 58mm TB.....everything was ported to the max....the car completely fell on it's face at 4500rpm. Kinda disapponting...but being able to light both tires up at 40mph in 3rd gear was kinda neat.
#26
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Usa
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 85 IROC-Z
Engine: magflatoVE
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9" 411
John Lingenfelter (RIP) made a killer 420. 3.875 stroke, 5.875 rods, custom pistons, 234/244 cam, 190 AFR ported heads and Superram on the top. This engine made 540 tq @ 4500 and 525 hp @ 5500.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by TB_91_GTA
Would putting a supercharger in front of the TPI help to give it enough air??
Would putting a supercharger in front of the TPI help to give it enough air??
but you would still get even more power with a diffrent manifold.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9192camaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
02-03-2019 12:21 AM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
03-05-2017 06:37 PM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
12-02-2016 06:33 PM