Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Anyone used this before?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #1  
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Anyone used this? Any thoughts?

I just purchased this Edelbrock Multi Point Fuel Injection setup off my cousin for 250 bucks, causehe is really strapped for cash. I got the distributor, wiring harness, intake, the little programmer and I believe even the fuel pump as well. He is supposed to be getting the O2 sensor for me soon but im not sure. anyways, Im sure 250 was a snag for this but anyone ever used it? If so, will it be easy to tune, hard to tune, crappy, whats the opinions here, i plan on building a mild 350/383 and drop it into the 92 RS and put either a 6 speed or a th350/700R4 with a 300 stall behind it, not sure on all specs but i know ill be purchasing a good set of heads hopefully and im just wondering what kind of good I could get out of this, im want to hit the 7's (1/8th mi) with this setup and im wondering if thats plausible? 3.73 gears are planned and I couldnt pass this up but will it do what i want it to? thanks.


Its Edelbrock Part #3500 Edelbrock Performer RPM Pro Flo EFI setup

Sorry I couldnt post any pics but go to http://www.edelbrock.com and look at it. thanks again.

Last edited by TBI92Camaro; Nov 27, 2004 at 04:08 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #2  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Thats a pretty slick setup. I have though a lot about one, but I was looking at the next step up for mine. I have seen one in action, but didnt get a lot of time working with it. The guy that owned it said that he loved it, and wouldnt trade it for any carb.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 04:08 PM
  #3  
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Do you think it will be good for 350-400 horses or so? Just curious. thanks. You dont have to have used it but I just need some input here!!!
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #4  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
They post a dyno sheet showing 435 HP.

If it can't do it, that's called "false advertising".
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2004 | 09:22 PM
  #5  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
I think that 350-400 is easily within its ability. I have seen them easily do that. I think that its capable of more than the advertised 435, but its maxing out at that point. They have another verion, one step up from that, which is the one I am wanting.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 03:35 AM
  #6  
84 Z-28 350's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 702
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
I whish I had my dyno sheet but with a fresh engine I had 506 hp at 5600 rpm (if I remember correctly), when I do my rebuild when I get back from korea, I'll update ya'll on how much better it dose with my new parts (there a suprise )
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.