Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

xe 262 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #1  
scubas_90rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Car: 90 RS, 83 z28, 85 ranger
Engine: none, 350, 2.8
Transmission: none, t-5, 5-speed
xe 262 question

i was reading some of the details of this cam on jegs websit it says

"We do not recommend the use of stock valve train components with these camshafts due to the aggressive lobe designs."

I was told that this was the largest cam i could go with on stock equipment. now that i read about little more about it, i read this now i am wondering. is it ok to use my stock springs and rockers or do i need to replace them as well? any help is greatful.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #2  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #3  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Stock springs and rockers are pretty weak. They're only barely adequate for stock cams, if your standards for "adequate" are real low.

NO aftermarket cam, not even an Edlebrock "performer", will reach its full potential with stock valve train hardware. Will it "work"? Maybe. At least for a little while. If the stock hardware is new. Will it "perform as advertised"? Absolutely not.

The XE cams are highly aggressive, fast-ramp designs. They are intended to snap the valve often as far as possible as quickly as possible, hold it open as long as possible, and drop it back on the seat as rapidly as possible. Stock springs probly won't surviv a trip around the block, with the beating those cams dish out. Even the little ones like the XE262.

Get the right valve springs and retainers and stuff for sure; and consider a rocker upgrade. The Comp 14 series are entirely adequate, and fit under stock valve covers, and therefore don't start the "chain reaction" of this doesn't fit, so I buy that; that doesn't fit, so I have to replace the other; now the such-and-such doesn't work because the other is in the way and it can't reach; etc. etc. etc.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 01:09 AM
  #4  
scubas_90rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Car: 90 RS, 83 z28, 85 ranger
Engine: none, 350, 2.8
Transmission: none, t-5, 5-speed
do you have any #'s or a price on those rockers. i tryed looking for them but i couldn't find them. or i found them but didn't know it.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 01:16 AM
  #5  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
They're about $150 for the non-self aligning and about $190 for the self aligning version.

http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...0&autoview=sku
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
scubas_90rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Car: 90 RS, 83 z28, 85 ranger
Engine: none, 350, 2.8
Transmission: none, t-5, 5-speed
thanks for the link. well it looks like no new cam for me. don't have the income for both new rockers and the complete cam kit. is there another cam i can go with and still use stock equipment temporaley? i know it wouldn't be a good idea to use stock stuff but untill i get the cash to get the rest of the stuff to help with the rest.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #7  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Why not just save up for a few more weeks?

The deal is, the purpose of changing out the cam, is to get more valve action. In order to make the engine run stronger and at higher RPMs, the valves open sooner and faster and farther, and then close faster. Everything in the valve train is stressed more as a result. A cam that doesn't stress the valve train more, won't make the motor run any different from stock.

It would be alot smarter to wait for a while, put your pennies together, and do it all at once. Otherwise, you risk breaking parts, if you change the cause of the stress, and not the victim of it.

If you just have to spend the money NOW, get the springs and rockers and stuff; and get the cam later.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #8  
scubas_90rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Car: 90 RS, 83 z28, 85 ranger
Engine: none, 350, 2.8
Transmission: none, t-5, 5-speed
yeah now that i think about it a little more i think i will hold off on it. anyway i'm starting a new job so this project will have to put on hold for a while. thanks for the advice and help
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #9  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I don't see why he can't use stock rockers, lots of people do. Just buy the cam, put it in and keep the stock rockers. When you save up, replace them. Just don't go crazy wtih 6000 rpm revs and you'll be fine.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #10  
scubas_90rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Car: 90 RS, 83 z28, 85 ranger
Engine: none, 350, 2.8
Transmission: none, t-5, 5-speed
Originally posted by pasky
Just don't go crazy wtih 6000 rpm revs and you'll be fine.
i don't go over 5 anyway. i was going to do all this when i had the engine out of the car. just to make it eaiser on myself. but i don't know any more. starting pulling some body panels off the 83 and found somethings that i didn't like. looks like the it has been in one front end wreck. the support for the bumper cover was bent in and a new cover was put on. under thepassenger fender the floor pan is ****** up. the just put a new fender on it and called it good. so i don't know what i am going to do.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
82CamaroZ28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Webster, MA
Car: 1982 Camaro Z28
Engine: Self-built 350
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/2800 Vigilante
Axle/Gears: Eaton 3.73 w/Moser axles
If you are able to save up the money, I would recommend that you get a XE262 K-Kit - that will have just about everything you need in it. When I installed my xe262 last year I also got new pushrods and 1.52 Magnum rockers (saved some money by getting them new on eBay). FYI, on the card that comes with the cam, COMP says they will not warranty the cam unless all new recomended valvetrain components are used.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #12  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I always found it cheaper to buy parts seperately from the kit....I spent about $500 including a new timing chain and electric waterpump, springs and the cam. Thats about how much a kit costs. Do the swap, keep the stock rockers, at 5,000 rpm, their not gonna hurt you but save up for some better ones. If I were you, i'd also run a stronger timing chain, double roller. Their not that expensive.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:25 PM
  #13  
82CamaroZ28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Webster, MA
Car: 1982 Camaro Z28
Engine: Self-built 350
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/2800 Vigilante
Axle/Gears: Eaton 3.73 w/Moser axles
I paid 309 for the kit from Summit...the flat tappet kits are MUCH cheaper than a roller kit.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...1&autoview=sku
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:31 PM
  #14  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Ohhh, this is a flat tappet cam?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 11:56 PM
  #15  
scubas_90rs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
Car: 90 RS, 83 z28, 85 ranger
Engine: none, 350, 2.8
Transmission: none, t-5, 5-speed
yes it is. i am not going with the cam at this time. i need to buy other parts for the car instead of a cam.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
Oct 29, 2022 09:20 PM
fasteddi
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
15
Sep 10, 2015 09:32 AM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
Aug 31, 2015 12:02 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.