Quick question about lifters
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Quick question about lifters
I am in the process of a cam swap. I bought the cam off summit raceing and it came with the lifters also. I just got done pulling one of the lifters out and i noticed that it is a roller lifter, but the lifters that i bought are not, they are just flat on the bottom, and also the one that i bought are not as long as the stockers.will this matter? It said on summit that there lifters are compatible.
I know that the roller lifters are probably better. Thanks.
I know that the roller lifters are probably better. Thanks.
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
What do you mean "downgrade your car"? What kind of pushrods do i need?
Last edited by del91_305; 04-05-2005 at 05:03 PM.
#4
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28HO
Engine: 350 summit block
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt
"What do you mean "downgrade your car"? "
More than likely he means downgrading from a roller cam to a flat tappet cam.
More than likely he means downgrading from a roller cam to a flat tappet cam.
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
No, you cannot.
Cams are designed for the specific type of lifter that is to be used with them. You cannot put roller lifters on a cam designed for flat tappet lifters. What RB was saying is you should have spent your money on a replacement roller cam. You could have reused your roller lifters if you had done that. Now, you need to use the lifters that came with the cam, and get longer pushrods intended for use with flat tappet lifters.
Cams are designed for the specific type of lifter that is to be used with them. You cannot put roller lifters on a cam designed for flat tappet lifters. What RB was saying is you should have spent your money on a replacement roller cam. You could have reused your roller lifters if you had done that. Now, you need to use the lifters that came with the cam, and get longer pushrods intended for use with flat tappet lifters.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Well, i wish i was more educated on this subject, that is way this has happened, simply because i didnt no better i guess. So let me ask you this, since i already have the cam and lifters, would it be worth it to try and send them back and get roller equipment? Is there a difference in horsepower that is significant enough to justified the added trouble and money? Also what is the difference in a roller and flat tappet cam? i mean as far the difference that you can see
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
No, The only time going to a solid roller would be positive (other than to remain "factory") would be if you need an excessive amount of rpm's to gain power, 7000+ specifically. A solid roller does not drop off power as a hydraulic roller would. The downsides to a solid roller is valvetrain wear, you will generally be replacing lifters every 30,000 miles and notice a bit more valvetrain noise and knock sensors do not like this if your equipped with one. I would try to get a hydraulic roller.
#10
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Ill probly yank that engine before 30,000 miles anyways. So my engine stock was a solid roller, and the setup i have is a hydrolic roller, right?
#12
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
me neither, i just know that when i got one of the lifters out that i noticed it had a little wheel on it
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
If it looked like this, it was a hydraulic roller lifter:
http://www.catpep.com/images/product...hydrolicRL.jpg
If it looked like this, it was a flat tappet:
http://www.flatlanderracing.com/gm/5232720.gif
http://www.catpep.com/images/product...hydrolicRL.jpg
If it looked like this, it was a flat tappet:
http://www.flatlanderracing.com/gm/5232720.gif
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Pasky, what are you smoking? no one said anything about solid anything here.
Near as I can tell, you had hydraulic roller lifters factory, you bought a standard SBC upgrade setup, hydraulic flat tappet. You may have noticed the kit said pre-1987 or something like that? and you ignored it? anyway, using flat tappet instead of roller is a downgrade. That's why your kit probably cost around $300 rather then $600 or so. However you'll need new pushrods now, so the price jumps...
There is a difference, the roller lifter will rev easier, have a nicer power curve, and there is no break in period.
Yes, if I were you, i'd see if you can return it, if you haven't installed it yet, maybe it'll work... Then order a roller cam, and you can reuse your stock lifters.
Got it?
Near as I can tell, you had hydraulic roller lifters factory, you bought a standard SBC upgrade setup, hydraulic flat tappet. You may have noticed the kit said pre-1987 or something like that? and you ignored it? anyway, using flat tappet instead of roller is a downgrade. That's why your kit probably cost around $300 rather then $600 or so. However you'll need new pushrods now, so the price jumps...
There is a difference, the roller lifter will rev easier, have a nicer power curve, and there is no break in period.
Yes, if I were you, i'd see if you can return it, if you haven't installed it yet, maybe it'll work... Then order a roller cam, and you can reuse your stock lifters.
Got it?
#16
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
You may have noticed the kit said pre-1987 or something like that? and you ignored it?
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
hmm, comp-cams does it the way I described.
I suppose, to be perfectly correct, it WILL WORK in your 1991 Camaro... just not correctly.
I suppose, to be perfectly correct, it WILL WORK in your 1991 Camaro... just not correctly.
#19
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
but if i put in my cam and the flat tappet lifters with longer push rods it will be fine right?
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
yes.
just make sure to break it in properly.
and it won't perform as well or as nicely as a comparable roller one.
just make sure to break it in properly.
and it won't perform as well or as nicely as a comparable roller one.
#21
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
So the Pre-87 motors had the flat tappet type assemble right?
Also can someone please help me find the pushrods that i need. These are the lifters:
http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...h.asp&x=32&y=5
Also can someone please help me find the pushrods that i need. These are the lifters:
http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...h.asp&x=32&y=5
Last edited by del91_305; 04-06-2005 at 12:15 PM.
#22
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Edit: The Summitracing URL is screwing up. Search for p/n SUM-G6400.
Found by searching the phrase "pushrod length": https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=271544
Found by searching the phrase "pushrod length": https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=271544
Last edited by five7kid; 04-06-2005 at 01:22 PM.
#24
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'll try again. It was sending me to a remote oil filter kit when I clicked on it after posting.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...&N=0&part=SUM%
FWIW, I used the Summit pushrods for the 396 when I rebuilt it in 1997. They're still working just fine. Of course, they're a completely different part than the SBC pushrods...
(Edit: still does it for me, but the p/n search works.)
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...&N=0&part=SUM%
FWIW, I used the Summit pushrods for the 396 when I rebuilt it in 1997. They're still working just fine. Of course, they're a completely different part than the SBC pushrods...
(Edit: still does it for me, but the p/n search works.)
#25
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
Here's another thing to think about. I think the distributor gears are different for hydraulic cams vs roller cams. That's why you can't use '87 and up HEI's on older engines. It'll chew up the gear teeth on the cam.
#26
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Ok well the part number on the lifters is SUM-HT817.
I am also going from TBI to Carb, so i am gonna have to get a different distributor anyways. One with the coil on top of the car with work right?
Here's another thing to think about. I think the distributor gears are different for hydraulic cams vs roller cams. That's why you can't use '87 and up HEI's on older engines. It'll chew up the gear teeth on the cam.
#27
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Only thing I've heard is the other way around - you shouldn't use older distributors on factory roller cams. The factory uses a "melonized" gear on roller cam applications, and from what I've heard, that's all they make available anymore.
I'm using a ZZ4 distributor in my flat-tappet equiped 396. No issues to date (2 years).
I'm using a ZZ4 distributor in my flat-tappet equiped 396. No issues to date (2 years).
#28
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by del91_305
Ok well the part number on the lifters is SUM-HT817.
Ok well the part number on the lifters is SUM-HT817.
#29
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
No personal experience with the different distributors. Got my info from here (third paragraph from bottom):
http://www.chevythunder.com/fuel%20i...%20pg%20AA.htm
http://www.chevythunder.com/fuel%20i...%20pg%20AA.htm
#30
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kingsport,tn
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
I was talking about the link I posted, not your link. It works fine.
So i can use a distributor out of an older car right?
#31
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by 86LG4T56
No personal experience with the different distributors. Got my info from here (third paragraph from bottom):
http://www.chevythunder.com/fuel%20i...%20pg%20AA.htm
No personal experience with the different distributors. Got my info from here (third paragraph from bottom):
http://www.chevythunder.com/fuel%20i...%20pg%20AA.htm
del91_305, yes, using an older distributor with your new cam will be fine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post