Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Quick question about lifters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #1  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Quick question about lifters

I am in the process of a cam swap. I bought the cam off summit raceing and it came with the lifters also. I just got done pulling one of the lifters out and i noticed that it is a roller lifter, but the lifters that i bought are not, they are just flat on the bottom, and also the one that i bought are not as long as the stockers.will this matter? It said on summit that there lifters are compatible.
I know that the roller lifters are probably better. Thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #2  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Yes they are compatible.

Remember, when you downgrade your car that way, you need to use longer push rods.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
What do you mean "downgrade your car"? What kind of pushrods do i need?

Last edited by del91_305; Apr 5, 2005 at 05:03 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #4  
Zed'er's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 84 Z28HO
Engine: 350 summit block
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt
"What do you mean "downgrade your car"? "




More than likely he means downgrading from a roller cam to a flat tappet cam.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #5  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
So really i could get by with using my stock lifters then right?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #6  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
No, you cannot.

Cams are designed for the specific type of lifter that is to be used with them. You cannot put roller lifters on a cam designed for flat tappet lifters. What RB was saying is you should have spent your money on a replacement roller cam. You could have reused your roller lifters if you had done that. Now, you need to use the lifters that came with the cam, and get longer pushrods intended for use with flat tappet lifters.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #7  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I wouldn't consider a solid roller a downgrade unless it wasn't necessary.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #8  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Well, i wish i was more educated on this subject, that is way this has happened, simply because i didnt no better i guess. So let me ask you this, since i already have the cam and lifters, would it be worth it to try and send them back and get roller equipment? Is there a difference in horsepower that is significant enough to justified the added trouble and money? Also what is the difference in a roller and flat tappet cam? i mean as far the difference that you can see
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #9  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
No, The only time going to a solid roller would be positive (other than to remain "factory") would be if you need an excessive amount of rpm's to gain power, 7000+ specifically. A solid roller does not drop off power as a hydraulic roller would. The downsides to a solid roller is valvetrain wear, you will generally be replacing lifters every 30,000 miles and notice a bit more valvetrain noise and knock sensors do not like this if your equipped with one. I would try to get a hydraulic roller.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #10  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Ill probly yank that engine before 30,000 miles anyways. So my engine stock was a solid roller, and the setup i have is a hydrolic roller, right?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #11  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
no idea on stock...
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
me neither, i just know that when i got one of the lifters out that i noticed it had a little wheel on it
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #13  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
If it looked like this, it was a hydraulic roller lifter:

http://www.catpep.com/images/product...hydrolicRL.jpg

If it looked like this, it was a flat tappet:

http://www.flatlanderracing.com/gm/5232720.gif
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #14  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Pasky, what are you smoking? no one said anything about solid anything here.
Near as I can tell, you had hydraulic roller lifters factory, you bought a standard SBC upgrade setup, hydraulic flat tappet. You may have noticed the kit said pre-1987 or something like that? and you ignored it? anyway, using flat tappet instead of roller is a downgrade. That's why your kit probably cost around $300 rather then $600 or so. However you'll need new pushrods now, so the price jumps...
There is a difference, the roller lifter will rev easier, have a nicer power curve, and there is no break in period.
Yes, if I were you, i'd see if you can return it, if you haven't installed it yet, maybe it'll work... Then order a roller cam, and you can reuse your stock lifters.
Got it?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #15  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
My bad, thought he said solid roller.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #16  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
You may have noticed the kit said pre-1987 or something like that? and you ignored it?
Ummm, no the discription clearly say it will work for 91 camaro with 305
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #17  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Ok then my new lifters are flat tappet, and stock are hydrolic roller
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:59 PM
  #18  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
hmm, comp-cams does it the way I described.

I suppose, to be perfectly correct, it WILL WORK in your 1991 Camaro... just not correctly.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #19  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
but if i put in my cam and the flat tappet lifters with longer push rods it will be fine right?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #20  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
yes.



just make sure to break it in properly.

and it won't perform as well or as nicely as a comparable roller one.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #21  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
So the Pre-87 motors had the flat tappet type assemble right?
Also can someone please help me find the pushrods that i need. These are the lifters:
http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...h.asp&x=32&y=5

Last edited by del91_305; Apr 6, 2005 at 12:15 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #22  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Edit: The Summitracing URL is screwing up. Search for p/n SUM-G6400.

Found by searching the phrase "pushrod length": https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=271544

Last edited by five7kid; Apr 6, 2005 at 01:22 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 01:44 PM
  #23  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Hmmm, it works when i click it.

Thanks alot for the link!!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #24  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'll try again. It was sending me to a remote oil filter kit when I clicked on it after posting.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...&N=0&part=SUM%

FWIW, I used the Summit pushrods for the 396 when I rebuilt it in 1997. They're still working just fine. Of course, they're a completely different part than the SBC pushrods...

(Edit: still does it for me, but the p/n search works.)
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #25  
86LG4T56's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
Here's another thing to think about. I think the distributor gears are different for hydraulic cams vs roller cams. That's why you can't use '87 and up HEI's on older engines. It'll chew up the gear teeth on the cam.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #26  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
Ok well the part number on the lifters is SUM-HT817.


Here's another thing to think about. I think the distributor gears are different for hydraulic cams vs roller cams. That's why you can't use '87 and up HEI's on older engines. It'll chew up the gear teeth on the cam.
I am also going from TBI to Carb, so i am gonna have to get a different distributor anyways. One with the coil on top of the car with work right?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #27  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Only thing I've heard is the other way around - you shouldn't use older distributors on factory roller cams. The factory uses a "melonized" gear on roller cam applications, and from what I've heard, that's all they make available anymore.

I'm using a ZZ4 distributor in my flat-tappet equiped 396. No issues to date (2 years).
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #28  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by del91_305
Ok well the part number on the lifters is SUM-HT817.
I was talking about the link I posted, not your link. It works fine.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #29  
86LG4T56's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
No personal experience with the different distributors. Got my info from here (third paragraph from bottom):

http://www.chevythunder.com/fuel%20i...%20pg%20AA.htm
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #30  
del91_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
I was talking about the link I posted, not your link. It works fine.
Ohh, my bad

So i can use a distributor out of an older car right?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #31  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by 86LG4T56
No personal experience with the different distributors. Got my info from here (third paragraph from bottom):

http://www.chevythunder.com/fuel%20i...%20pg%20AA.htm
There really isn't a problem using a melonized gear on a flat-tappet cam.

del91_305, yes, using an older distributor with your new cam will be fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
happyhapka
TPI
3
Aug 15, 2015 04:42 PM
jahblah
Tech / General Engine
5
Aug 12, 2015 05:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.