question about the 345 np 030 piston.
question about the 345 np 030 piston.
There been a mixup between my engine builder and me on what pistons to use. He rebuild my engine with the 340np 030 cast pistons. I whanted the hyper version of that piston.
He will ofcourse fix that or give me money to compensate for the error.
But as I did not see this until the engine whas re-installed to the car ( with no heads ), I having second thouts about take it out again. It will take some time to do this all over again. And the summer in Sweden is short :/
He say that I will be fine with those cast piston and the engine combo i will use. What do your experince say? This is my engine combo.
355
scat 9000 crank
scat 9000 i-rods
345np 030 cast pistons
LT4 hotcam
1.6rr
canfield 197cc heads
Converted lt1 intake
Headers
dual 3inch
Car is a manual -91 corvette
I will not use F/I
And I shift around 6000rpm.
Thanks for your time..
He will ofcourse fix that or give me money to compensate for the error.
But as I did not see this until the engine whas re-installed to the car ( with no heads ), I having second thouts about take it out again. It will take some time to do this all over again. And the summer in Sweden is short :/
He say that I will be fine with those cast piston and the engine combo i will use. What do your experince say? This is my engine combo.
355
scat 9000 crank
scat 9000 i-rods
345np 030 cast pistons
LT4 hotcam
1.6rr
canfield 197cc heads
Converted lt1 intake
Headers
dual 3inch
Car is a manual -91 corvette
I will not use F/I
And I shift around 6000rpm.
Thanks for your time..
Originally Posted by mw66nova
just don't spray it, it should be fine.
Im a bit worried if those pistons will be more sensitve to detonation than the hyper version?
Thanks
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Less sensitive to detonation.
Much more sensitive to excessive RPMs however. Use a rev limiter if you can. Set it to no more than 6200, if you want it to live a long time.
Much more sensitive to excessive RPMs however. Use a rev limiter if you can. Set it to no more than 6200, if you want it to live a long time.
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Less sensitive to detonation.
Much more sensitive to excessive RPMs however. Use a rev limiter if you can. Set it to no more than 6200, if you want it to live a long time.
Much more sensitive to excessive RPMs however. Use a rev limiter if you can. Set it to no more than 6200, if you want it to live a long time.
Sounds good about the beeing less sensitive to detonation, as I need to get this tuned right away.
With my cam and the intake I got my power should peak at around 6000rpm.
You think that will be a probleme?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Should be OK.
Check your deck clearance before you put the heads on; I'll bet that those are going to be .045" (just over 1mm) down in the hole. Your compression won't be whatever you think it is.
Check your deck clearance before you put the heads on; I'll bet that those are going to be .045" (just over 1mm) down in the hole. Your compression won't be whatever you think it is.
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Should be OK.
Check your deck clearance before you put the heads on; I'll bet that those are going to be .045" (just over 1mm) down in the hole. Your compression won't be whatever you think it is.
Check your deck clearance before you put the heads on; I'll bet that those are going to be .045" (just over 1mm) down in the hole. Your compression won't be whatever you think it is.

The heads i use are with 64cc chambers. Mmm what do you mean about the compression? I thougt it should land between 9.5:1-10:1 somwhere??
Regards
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
64cc heads, .045" deck clearance, .039" head gasket (such as FelPro 1010), 6cc valve reliefs, .030" over 350:
9.3:1
That's a pretty small cam, the motor isn't going to make power at or above 6000 anyway (probably will top out around 56-5700), so just don't run it way up there, I don't think the pistons will be a problem.
9.3:1
That's a pretty small cam, the motor isn't going to make power at or above 6000 anyway (probably will top out around 56-5700), so just don't run it way up there, I don't think the pistons will be a problem.
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
64cc heads, .045" deck clearance, .039" head gasket (such as FelPro 1010), 6cc valve reliefs, .030" over 350:
9.3:1
That's a pretty small cam, the motor isn't going to make power at or above 6000 anyway (probably will top out around 56-5700), so just don't run it way up there, I don't think the pistons will be a problem.
9.3:1
That's a pretty small cam, the motor isn't going to make power at or above 6000 anyway (probably will top out around 56-5700), so just don't run it way up there, I don't think the pistons will be a problem.

Good news about the pistons, so I can get a good nights sleep...
regards
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Those cast pistons are so far in the hole your engine wont have any good compression. The quench is going to be untouchable. Rule of thumb is not to go over .060 of quench. With a stock deck clearance and gasket thickness you will be way over this desired quench. Deck clearance can vary if the block was never decked and most head ccs are usually off like a few points. They could really measure out to 67 cc. .035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance. Im pretty sure those pistons are meant for a decked block. You can end up with a bad running engine with lots of detonation with that much quench. Theirs more to compression than just slapping parts together to reach a desired compression. You have to get the correct pistons to get the adequate quench. I would suggest having the block decked if it hasnt already or get different pistons.
Last edited by shaggy56; May 18, 2006 at 12:44 PM.
Originally Posted by shaggy56
Those cast pistons are so far in the hole your engine wont have any good compression. The quench is going to be untouchable. Rule of thumb is not to go over .060 of quench. With a stock deck clearance and gasket thickness you will be way over this desired quench. Deck clearance can vary if the block was never decked and most head ccs are usually off like a few points. They could really measure out to 67 cc. .035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance. Im pretty sure those pistons are meant for a decked block. You can end up with a bad running engine with lots of detonation with that much quench. Theirs more to compression than just slapping parts together to reach a desired compression. You have to get the correct pistons to get the adequate quench.
Part number STL-345NP30 has ,"Compression Distance (in): 1.560 in."
From sumit.. If that tell you something??
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
The cast pistons your are reffering to have a compression height of 1.540. Look it up on the Federal Mogul website. The hypers are 1.560. If you want to be absolutly postive you need to measure your pistons in the hole.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
No matter what the catalog says, if your TRUE compression ratio really matters to you, you MUST measure the deck height. The specs are almost always too ambiguous to be useful. Plus, blocks vary widely, even before they've been worked on.
As stated, the "ideal" quench, which is the distance from the flat part of the top of the piston to the flat part of the head deck, is in the .035" - .040" range. The most common head gaskets are about that thick, so "zero decking" the block to the pistons, such that the pistons are exactly level with the block at top dead center, gives the "perfect" result. The higher the compression, the more important it becomes. However with the motor you're building, you're not pushing any kind of limits on that, so I doubt that it will be critical.
The reason your deck height will be about .045" is because "rebuilder" pistons ALMOST ALWAYS locate the piston about .020" lower than stock (1.54" compression height vs 1.56"). The people who make them must think that it's better that the pistons not come up and hit the head, as compared to giving up a little compression. Stock deck clearance is about .025", and those pistons have about .020" more, for a total of about .045".
Measure all 4 "corner" cylinders. You might even get a surprise in the difference between them.
As stated, the "ideal" quench, which is the distance from the flat part of the top of the piston to the flat part of the head deck, is in the .035" - .040" range. The most common head gaskets are about that thick, so "zero decking" the block to the pistons, such that the pistons are exactly level with the block at top dead center, gives the "perfect" result. The higher the compression, the more important it becomes. However with the motor you're building, you're not pushing any kind of limits on that, so I doubt that it will be critical.
The reason your deck height will be about .045" is because "rebuilder" pistons ALMOST ALWAYS locate the piston about .020" lower than stock (1.54" compression height vs 1.56"). The people who make them must think that it's better that the pistons not come up and hit the head, as compared to giving up a little compression. Stock deck clearance is about .025", and those pistons have about .020" more, for a total of about .045".
Measure all 4 "corner" cylinders. You might even get a surprise in the difference between them.
Whery interesting. Does this also apply to the overbore 345np30 pistons. I cand find those pistons on the federal mogul web catalog?`
So what you are saying is that in my case my comp will be lower then what i first belived? As you said around 9.3:1? Due to the .020" lower than stock?
i dont follow what shaggy56 is talking about "...035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance." Will i get trouble with those pistons? Perhaps time to talk to my engine builder again
..
Regards
So what you are saying is that in my case my comp will be lower then what i first belived? As you said around 9.3:1? Due to the .020" lower than stock?
i dont follow what shaggy56 is talking about "...035 of quench is usually desired since this helps prevent detonation and helps performance." Will i get trouble with those pistons? Perhaps time to talk to my engine builder again
..Regards
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Yes it applies to those pistons. I'm pretty sure they have 1.54" compression height.... which is -.020" compared to stock.
With the low compression you have there, you'll be fine. Don't worry about it. As I said, the higher the compression, the more important it is; but correspondingly, the lower the compression, the less difference it makes. It's all about the combo, not just one part.
With the low compression you have there, you'll be fine. Don't worry about it. As I said, the higher the compression, the more important it is; but correspondingly, the lower the compression, the less difference it makes. It's all about the combo, not just one part.
Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Yes it applies to those pistons. I'm pretty sure they have 1.54" compression height.... which is -.020" compared to stock.
With the low compression you have there, you'll be fine. Don't worry about it. As I said, the higher the compression, the more important it is; but correspondingly, the lower the compression, the less difference it makes. It's all about the combo, not just one part.
With the low compression you have there, you'll be fine. Don't worry about it. As I said, the higher the compression, the more important it is; but correspondingly, the lower the compression, the less difference it makes. It's all about the combo, not just one part.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
That would be good.
With aluminum heads, you should aim for close to 10:1 compression. Something around 58-60cc would be ideal.
With aluminum heads, you should aim for close to 10:1 compression. Something around 58-60cc would be ideal.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
I have read this numerous times and thought it would apply but you suggest it wont in his engine. With his deck which could even be more that .025 and even a shim gasket he would be at .060. But of course that using a nominal measurement not his actual deck height. With a thick gasket his quench would be way out of bounds.
Im quoting out of an engine builders book. If you have Performance Trends Engine Analyzer see what happens if you try and punch in a quench higher than .060.
Im quoting out of an engine builders book. If you have Performance Trends Engine Analyzer see what happens if you try and punch in a quench higher than .060.
running quench height in excess of .060" will forfeit the benefits of the quench head design and can cause severe detonation.
Last edited by shaggy56; May 18, 2006 at 02:33 PM.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Yes I've seen alot of engine builder books too. And I don't mean to discount what they say; only, that you have to put things in their proper perspective.
The lower the compression ratio, the lower the tendency toward detonation, in the first place. Meaning there is little or no need to worry about preventing it. The higher the compression, the more of an issue it becomes.
Which is why things like stock motors with dished pistons, where the quench might easily be .125" or more, still don't have detonation issues.
The lower the compression ratio, the lower the tendency toward detonation, in the first place. Meaning there is little or no need to worry about preventing it. The higher the compression, the more of an issue it becomes.
Which is why things like stock motors with dished pistons, where the quench might easily be .125" or more, still don't have detonation issues.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Here straight from the horses mouth.
United Engine and Machine Co.
United Engine and Machine Co.
If you are building an engine with steel rods, tight bearings and pistons, modest RPM and automatic transmission, a .035" quench is the minimum practical to run without engine damage. The closer the piston comes to the cylinder head at operating speed, the more turbulence is generated. Unfortunately, the operating quench height varies in an engine as RPM and temperatures change. If aluminum rods, loose pistons (they rock and hit the head), and over 6000 RPM operation is anticipated, a static clearance of .055" could be required. A running quench height in excess of .060" will forfeit the benefits of the quench head design and can cause severe detonation.
The suggested .040" static quench height is recommended as a good usable dimension for stock rod engines up to 6500 RPM. Above 6500 RPM, rod selection becomes important. Since it is the close collision between the piston and the cylinder head that reduces the prospect of detonation, never add a shim or head gasket to lower compression on a quench head engine. If you have 10:1 with a proper quench and then add an extra .040" gasket to give 9.5:1 and .080" quench, you will create more ping at 9.5:1 than you had at 10:1. The suitable way to lower the compression is to use a KB dish piston.
The suggested .040" static quench height is recommended as a good usable dimension for stock rod engines up to 6500 RPM. Above 6500 RPM, rod selection becomes important. Since it is the close collision between the piston and the cylinder head that reduces the prospect of detonation, never add a shim or head gasket to lower compression on a quench head engine. If you have 10:1 with a proper quench and then add an extra .040" gasket to give 9.5:1 and .080" quench, you will create more ping at 9.5:1 than you had at 10:1. The suitable way to lower the compression is to use a KB dish piston.
Last edited by shaggy56; May 18, 2006 at 04:14 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
variations
Heres a random block someone I know got. It shows how much deck heights vary. This is a good reason to deck a block.
#1: .032"
#2: .033"
#3: .027"
#4: .029"
#5: .029"
#6: .029"
#7: .029"
#8: .027"
#1: .032"
#2: .033"
#3: .027"
#4: .029"
#5: .029"
#6: .029"
#7: .029"
#8: .027"
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
excellent, good to hear...pistons are one thing i've learned to NOT cheap out on...
Last edited by mw66nova; May 19, 2006 at 08:31 AM.
A new question popped up that relates to this.
My block is bored out 030 and then honed. Will any forge pistons that is +030 fit? Or do you need to rehone the block to get the right piston to cylinder wall clereance that the manufactor recomend?
I sure my engine builder knows this, Im just curious mysefl
THanks
My block is bored out 030 and then honed. Will any forge pistons that is +030 fit? Or do you need to rehone the block to get the right piston to cylinder wall clereance that the manufactor recomend?
I sure my engine builder knows this, Im just curious mysefl

THanks
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Hard to say....
Measure your bore as it is now, accurately. If it's no larger than .030" overbored after honing, then at least your bores aren't already too large. Too large would be bad, because then you wouldn't be able to use it at .030" over, you'd have to bore it to the next oversize and buy that size of pistons.
But, with forged pistons, the EXACT bore clearance isn't as critical as with any type of cast, and also the desired clearance is larger. So for example (just pulling numbers out of the air) let's say your bores are at 4.031", and the current pistons require a bore clearance of .000" - .002", and there's .001" of clearance now. In other words, your machinist got it right on the money. Let's say that your new forged pistons require a bore clearance of .004" - .010", and it turns out that they're at .005" to the bore as it is now. Obviously you're "in spec", and no more work is required. You'd still be "in spec" if there was .008" of clearance; it might just be a bit noisy when cold, until it warms up and the pistons grow. On the other hand, you might find that your new clearance is now .002", which will require some more honing.
There's no way to know for sure until you have the parts in your hand. But, I'd suspect that your bores will be at least close, and quite possibly able to be used, as they are now.
Measure your bore as it is now, accurately. If it's no larger than .030" overbored after honing, then at least your bores aren't already too large. Too large would be bad, because then you wouldn't be able to use it at .030" over, you'd have to bore it to the next oversize and buy that size of pistons.
But, with forged pistons, the EXACT bore clearance isn't as critical as with any type of cast, and also the desired clearance is larger. So for example (just pulling numbers out of the air) let's say your bores are at 4.031", and the current pistons require a bore clearance of .000" - .002", and there's .001" of clearance now. In other words, your machinist got it right on the money. Let's say that your new forged pistons require a bore clearance of .004" - .010", and it turns out that they're at .005" to the bore as it is now. Obviously you're "in spec", and no more work is required. You'd still be "in spec" if there was .008" of clearance; it might just be a bit noisy when cold, until it warms up and the pistons grow. On the other hand, you might find that your new clearance is now .002", which will require some more honing.
There's no way to know for sure until you have the parts in your hand. But, I'd suspect that your bores will be at least close, and quite possibly able to be used, as they are now.
thanks for the answer 
The block is bored 030 and then torqueplate honed to use moly rings.
So the honing process is not only used for making the cross hatch marks in the cylinder bore to let the rings seat. But ALSO a way to take away material from the cylinder bore to keep the right piston to wall clerance, depending on what kind of pistons you will use? like a "fine" over-bore if you whant?
More questions.
If you take a piston that is +030 and whant to run a .004 cylinder wall clerance, Is that piston EXACT 4.030 big and then its up to you to hone out material to get .004? Or is that piston 4.030 minus .004?, and based on a "perfekt" 4.030 cylinderbore?
Regards
Devil..

The block is bored 030 and then torqueplate honed to use moly rings.
So the honing process is not only used for making the cross hatch marks in the cylinder bore to let the rings seat. But ALSO a way to take away material from the cylinder bore to keep the right piston to wall clerance, depending on what kind of pistons you will use? like a "fine" over-bore if you whant?
More questions.
If you take a piston that is +030 and whant to run a .004 cylinder wall clerance, Is that piston EXACT 4.030 big and then its up to you to hone out material to get .004? Or is that piston 4.030 minus .004?, and based on a "perfekt" 4.030 cylinderbore?
Regards
Devil..
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,917
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Depends on the pistons.
That's why it's standard procedure to NOT hone a block until you have the pistons in your posession.
But for the most part, for American cars anyway, the pistons are "undersize", and the bore should usually be finished within a thouandth or 2 of the "nominal" size. But not always.
That's why it's standard procedure to NOT hone a block until you have the pistons in your posession.
But for the most part, for American cars anyway, the pistons are "undersize", and the bore should usually be finished within a thouandth or 2 of the "nominal" size. But not always.
ok.
But in my case the engine where honed for the 345np030 pistons that I now will not use. it would be a shame if i need to bore it out to .040. I guess I just need to find a forge piston with the same ( or withing spec) piston to wall clerance as those pistons. Or messure the cylinder bore to se how big they are and then decide on what pistons to get.
As I look around for pistons, I do however see that the recomenden piston to wall clerance for most of the forge and many of the hyper pistons has got a pretty big span. From, lets say, 005-0015 etc etc.. So Perhaps Im within spec after all..
Thanks for your help so far. Im learning big time here
But in my case the engine where honed for the 345np030 pistons that I now will not use. it would be a shame if i need to bore it out to .040. I guess I just need to find a forge piston with the same ( or withing spec) piston to wall clerance as those pistons. Or messure the cylinder bore to se how big they are and then decide on what pistons to get.
As I look around for pistons, I do however see that the recomenden piston to wall clerance for most of the forge and many of the hyper pistons has got a pretty big span. From, lets say, 005-0015 etc etc.. So Perhaps Im within spec after all..
Thanks for your help so far. Im learning big time here
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







