performance
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The #1 best performance for $'s spent it to make sure everything is operating at its best - flow, spark, sensing, timing, etc.
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 1
From: buffalo ny
Car: 86 iroc
Engine: Iron 408 LS3 combo
Transmission: Ram10 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt :)
Re: performance
well cold air intake is a good idea but your better off building your own instead of spending $200 on one that does the same thing, k&n air cleaners, a high flow mass air flow sensor, high flow 58mm throttle body, a throttle body spacer, not sure but i think you could get a fuel pressure regulator and set the pressure a little higher, you could look up some tpis hints on how to make the tpi flow better, performance chip, headers and a 3in exaust from the cat back will do you good if you dont already have an exaust system. dont forget about diffrent heads, intake manifold and cams. you could have a 3 angle vaulve job done on your stock heads..... there are endless possabilitys it all depends on how much $$$$ you got
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete, FL.
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: 406 sbc
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9" ME with 4.56 gears
Re: performance
the cheapest way to make your car faster is get rid of everything in the car you don't need to make it lighter. that includes cleaning all of the dirt off of the undercarriage.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Posts #'s 2 & 5. That's about the end of the "cheap" things.
I wouldn't call heads "cheap". Or exhaust, although exhaust is needed before you spend any money beyond posts #'s 2 & 5.
I wouldn't spend money on a "performance chip". The better investment is getting the equipment and software to do your own chips. Again, not "cheap", but probably the best way to spend your money. An '89 will be MAF, which doesn't see as much improvement, and isn't as sensitive to other changes, as the '90-'92 speed density systems.
As usual, performance costs money. There aren't any "free" things you can do that will make big differences in performance. There are things that you can do that are "better" than other things, though, like synthetic engine oil, transmission fluid, and gear lube, that should be changed anyway, and while you're at it, spend a little more coin to get something a lot better.
I wouldn't put a K&N air filter on any vehicle I liked. They are nothing more than an expensive way to let more dirt into your engine.
I wouldn't call heads "cheap". Or exhaust, although exhaust is needed before you spend any money beyond posts #'s 2 & 5.
I wouldn't spend money on a "performance chip". The better investment is getting the equipment and software to do your own chips. Again, not "cheap", but probably the best way to spend your money. An '89 will be MAF, which doesn't see as much improvement, and isn't as sensitive to other changes, as the '90-'92 speed density systems.
As usual, performance costs money. There aren't any "free" things you can do that will make big differences in performance. There are things that you can do that are "better" than other things, though, like synthetic engine oil, transmission fluid, and gear lube, that should be changed anyway, and while you're at it, spend a little more coin to get something a lot better.
I wouldn't put a K&N air filter on any vehicle I liked. They are nothing more than an expensive way to let more dirt into your engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM





