Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

desktop dyno - this don't seem quite right

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
el_muerte's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Car: '87 Z-28
Engine: LT1-topped 400
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
desktop dyno - this don't seem quite right

I plugged in the following data for desktop dyno (basically my ride with a comp xe256 cam) it showed a peak of 267 hp at 4500 rpm... seems a bit high.

heads: unported 416 with stock valves (data entered from thread https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tech...416+heads+flow assuming similar flow data for the 081 heads)

9.5 compression ratio (I thought the 85 LG4 was lower, but that's what tech data on this site says)

750CFM 4bbl induction (qjet, reference: http://home.earthlink.net/~quadrajets/quadrajet_airflow_ratings.htm and didn't make a difference going as low as 600 cfm

dual plane std flow intake manifold (i thought the LG4 intakes were notoriously restrictive but desktop dyno doesn't really give you many options here)

small-tube headers with mufflers

xe256h-10 cam. also trying an xe-262h-10 showed 271 peak hp at 4500 rpm

anyone with a similar build have real world numbers to back that up?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #2  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: desktop dyno - this don't seem quite right

what desktop dyno program version are you using? i got this old 2003 version and everything i do so far is somewhat on the higher side. I tend to model it with small tube headers/mufflers and less induction flow to make power seem more accurate.

267 crank hp doesnt seem that bad tho. closer to 215-220 ish whp i'd say which is doing well for a 305 but i've seen some bolt on 305's dyno 190-210whp so one with a cam should do that. Its safe to say its probly in the 250-260 crank hp range as DD tends to go alittle high
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #3  
Viprklr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
Re: desktop dyno - this don't seem quite right

DD ASSumes that everything is tuned perfectly.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 12:53 AM
  #4  
el_muerte's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Car: '87 Z-28
Engine: LT1-topped 400
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: desktop dyno - this don't seem quite right

Yeah, i'm using DD2003. Thanks for the replies, I'm guessing with backyard tuning I'd probably be ten or fifteen horsepower lower?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
Oct 29, 2022 09:20 PM
Kevin91Z
Southern California Area
22
Sep 19, 2022 10:00 AM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM
Feffman
Mid-West Region
0
Aug 13, 2015 07:12 AM
Feffman
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
0
Aug 13, 2015 07:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.