1.7 ratio RR on a L98
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
1.7 ratio RR on a L98
I have a L98 block in my 86 IROC. Inside the block, I have a LT1 cam. Would I run into trouble if I install a set of 1.7 stainless steal Roller Rockers?
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: 1.7 ratio RR on a L98
Do they make a 1.7 ratio for that particular engine/head?
There's more to going to a higher lift than just the rocker ratio. Everyone knows about piston to valve clearance. Cam timing determines when the valves open and close in relation to where the piston is in the cylinder. Simply going to a higher ratio may cause the valve to hit the piston.
Many people don't realize that there are other clearance issues. Without a full roller rocker, the rocker could bind on the rocker stud if the lift is too great. There's also the clearance between the bottom of the spring retainer and the top of the valve guide/seal. Too much lift and the retainer hits the seal. Lastly is the valve springs. They're only installed to work with a specific amount of lift. Too high a lift and they'll bind and break. Increasing rocker ratio means the pushrod is located closer to the rocker stud. This means the pushrod itself gets moved. Do the pushrod holes through the head or any guideplates allow for this relocation?
Changing rocker ratio is a poor mans cam swap. It's better to install the proper cam and have the heads, valves, springs etc checked to make sure they can handle the increased lift.
There's more to going to a higher lift than just the rocker ratio. Everyone knows about piston to valve clearance. Cam timing determines when the valves open and close in relation to where the piston is in the cylinder. Simply going to a higher ratio may cause the valve to hit the piston.
Many people don't realize that there are other clearance issues. Without a full roller rocker, the rocker could bind on the rocker stud if the lift is too great. There's also the clearance between the bottom of the spring retainer and the top of the valve guide/seal. Too much lift and the retainer hits the seal. Lastly is the valve springs. They're only installed to work with a specific amount of lift. Too high a lift and they'll bind and break. Increasing rocker ratio means the pushrod is located closer to the rocker stud. This means the pushrod itself gets moved. Do the pushrod holes through the head or any guideplates allow for this relocation?
Changing rocker ratio is a poor mans cam swap. It's better to install the proper cam and have the heads, valves, springs etc checked to make sure they can handle the increased lift.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: 1.7 ratio RR on a L98
Good info AlkyIROC. All that process seems too far out of my budget. ill just stick with the 1.6. ratio. Thanks for the help
.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 3
From: Windsor Ontario
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 2004 LQ4
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:06 PM








