Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

vortec head cam, hows this one look?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #1  
86zBowtie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: NY, damn snow
Car: 1988 sport coupe z
Engine: 350 :)
Transmission: 700r4 B&M tranny
Axle/Gears: 2.73?
vortec head cam, hows this one look?

im lookin to put this in a set of stock vortec heads, what will i be makin roughly with stock internals on a 86 350 block with currently 9.4:1 compression. gonna have a air gap intake and edelbrock 600 with headers. what will i be makin roughly? heres the cam: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Howards-Cams...640#vi-content
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 01:03 PM
  #2  
1986Z28OWNER's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 962
Likes: 13
From: Canada
Car: 1979 Malibu
Engine: Blown LSx
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"/wavetrac/35's/3.70
Re: vortec head cam, hows this one look?

Id say 325-350ish HP.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 01:43 PM
  #3  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: vortec head cam, hows this one look?

Originally Posted by 1986Z28OWNER
Id say 325-350ish HP.
Im running a much larger cam than that at 9.8:1 compression and Im not putting down 325 even at the flywheel. Theres certain aspects of my build that arent perfect, but on the whole it's pretty average. I'm running long tubes, the functional equivalent of a dual 2.5 exhaust, and a Holley 650 through a manual trans.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 06:01 PM
  #4  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,962
Likes: 2,471
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: vortec head cam, hows this one look?

It looks COMPLETELY WRONG AND MISMATCHED to the heads.

It's a single pattern cam. WRONG.

Look at the Comp XE series, or Lunati Voodoo. Those are of the correct design, which matches the properties of the heads.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 11:01 AM
  #5  
86zBowtie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: NY, damn snow
Car: 1988 sport coupe z
Engine: 350 :)
Transmission: 700r4 B&M tranny
Axle/Gears: 2.73?
Re: vortec head cam, hows this one look?

so are there any dual/split pattern cams with around the same lift so I don't have as much work to do since it's a daily driver and not a strip car, but I do want choppy idle of course, just without insane lift to kill my gas and have to worry about detenation and knocking. vortecs dont need high lift to make power.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2012 | 02:01 PM
  #6  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: vortec head cam, hows this one look?

Just to throw some numbers out there... to give you a frame of reference:

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...s/viewall.html

Vortec head 355 on a dyno:
XE268 224/230 - 372hp - 1600-5800
280H 230/230 - 378hp - 2000-6000
XE274 230/236 - 385hp - 1800-6000

And this is a properly built engine with proper tolerances and good quench distances through the most ideal of ideal situations with long tube headers and no accessories etc with the measurement taken at the flywheel. So that should give you a frame of reference for how much cam it takes to hit a certain power level. 350fwhp (through accessories etc) and an ideal chassis setup with proper tires should be able to crack into the 12's with a 3rd gen. The xe274 above has a number of 385hp at the flywheel in ideal situations, not regular fwhp. So keep all that in mind. 350rwhp sbc's really arent as common as people think they are.


Originally Posted by sofakingdom
It looks COMPLETELY WRONG AND MISMATCHED to the heads.

It's a single pattern cam. WRONG.

Look at the Comp XE series, or Lunati Voodoo. Those are of the correct design, which matches the properties of the heads.

What do you make of that? You think some good headers/exhaust (Likely the case in the dyno room) can offset the effect of longer exhaust duration?

Originally Posted by 86zBowtie
so are there any dual/split pattern cams with around the same lift so I don't have as much work to do since it's a daily driver and not a strip car, but I do want choppy idle of course, just without insane lift to kill my gas and have to worry about detenation and knocking. vortecs dont need high lift to make power.


Choppy idle and docile street car do not mix. Lift is your friend, not your enemy. You want as much lift as possible for a given duration, this is why roller cams are so much better htan flat tappet cams, they can hit higher lifts and get to those lifts MUCH quicker than flat tappets. You're not gonna get a super choppy idle in a street car, and if you do you wont enjoy driving it unless you set up the car properly to do it. Gears, conver, etc. The xe268 is probably about as choppy as you can get if you want to be lazy about it.

But you have Vortec heads, which dont do great above .500 lift. One of the problems with these heads. And the stock retainers smack teh valve guides at around .460 lift. So you need to address that too.

Last edited by InfernalVortex; Mar 8, 2012 at 02:20 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
Oct 29, 2022 09:20 PM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
L98GTA87
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
1
Aug 11, 2015 06:55 PM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.