Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 03:50 PM
  #1  
Jfinnkma91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Bethel Park pa
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 7.5in 10 bolt with 3.08
383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

I'm building a 383 from a 1 peice rear main seal 350 block. I know with a 2 peice it can be internally balanced, people are telling me that a 1 peice it can only he externally balanced?

So if I go to the machine shop to balance my rotating assembly, will I still need a weighted flexplate and damper?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 410
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: 383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

Sofakingdom posted this on another post.

The counterweight for their rear rod throw is still evenly distributed in the correct manner; with half of it in front of the journal, and half behind it. Unlike the 400 or similar motors, where there isn't enough volume to put the correct amount of counterweight on the inside of the journal (along the axis of the crank toward the center), and therefore too much has to go on the outside of the journal (along the axis away from the center), the 350 crank allows for the theoretically correct weight on either side of the journal, such that it is dynamically balanced. The 400 has to be done this way at BOTH ends. The reason is, that the piston is tall enough to support what the factory considered to be the minimum acceptable ring package, that the rod had to be shortened; and the bottom of the piston comes so close to the crank when it's at BDC, that there isn't enough room left for an adequate amount of counterweight. That's why, in order to "internally" balance a shrt-rod 400, you have to use metal that's MUCH denser than the material the crank is made out of.

"Internal" and "external" balance DOES NOT refer to which side of the oil seal the balance weight is on, or even whether it's part of the crankshaft proper or not.

Pre-86 SBCs had the rearward portion of the balance weight located on the crank flange, which has that funky counterweight-looking shape to it (imagine that). 86-up ones, since the seal requires that the flange be no larger than the seal, require that the rearward weight be moved to the flywheel instead of on the crankshaft, since you can't very well slide a round lip seal over that other shape.

So, the weight on the 86-up crank "looks" like it's "external", and it is in fact physically "external" to the casting; but in reality, the design is still "internally" balanced.

Which means, that all you get by asking this question, is a whole bunch of confusion. It's better to avoid those words altogether when discussing these motors, because even if you're technically correct, people will misunderstand you about 90% or more of the time. If you say those words to your machine shop or go looking for parts or whatever, you will get hosed. The best thing to call it, is "stock" balance. Which is technically "internal", but requires that part of the counterweight be "external" to the crank, i.e. on the flywheel.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 05:08 PM
  #3  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 410
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: 383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

So if it's a "stock" 350 with a 1pc. RMS, and a crank for a 1pc. RMS, then you'd need a "stock" weighted 1pc. RMS flexplate or flywheel, which does have the counterweight.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #4  
88gunmetalgta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 2
Re: 383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

The only way you can be sure of your particular crankshaft balancing requirements is to contact your crank manufacturer.

I know for sure that Scat and Eagle mean different things when they say "internal" or "external" balanced.

Chances are you need a neutral balance dampner. If anyone tells you they know for sure which flexplate you need by the information you've given here, they're lying.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 06:00 PM
  #5  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: 383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

Originally Posted by 88gunmetalgta
The only way you can be sure of your particular crankshaft balancing requirements is to contact your crank manufacturer..

Some of the cheaper 383 stroker cranks ( or stroker kits ) are based on a 400 crank casting which requires both a weighted flywheel and balancer
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #6  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 410
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: 383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

Some of the cheaper 383 stroker cranks ( or stroker kits ) are based on a 400 crank casting which requires both a weighted flywheel and balancer
Ahhhhhh yes. The OP said 1pc. RMS block, BUT...obviously with a 383 it's NOT gonna use the stock crank. I missed that!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: 383 one peice rear main seal balancing question?

Originally Posted by Abubaca
Ahhhhhh yes. The OP said 1pc. RMS block, BUT...obviously with a 383 it's NOT gonna use the stock crank. I missed that!
This one particularly (disregard the " representative pic shown ) is a 400 based stroker crank for a 1 pce RMS engine
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ESP-103523750/

Notes ;
Requires a Chevy 400 harmonic balancer and the use of a stock type counter weighted flexplate or flywheel..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
Dec 21, 2015 10:36 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM
Reborn756
Tech / General Engine
142
Sep 4, 2015 03:42 AM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 9, 2015 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.