qwik ac question
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 16
From: nc
Car: 91RS
Engine: carb'd 357 vortec
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
qwik ac question
is there any difference between the ac in a 89rs 5.0tbi and the ac in a 92rs 3.1v6 besides the hoses? if so what? so I can buy whatever I'm missing then take to the ac man>
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 9
From: Kitchener, ON
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: qwik ac question
Accumulator, orifice tube and evaporator are the same. Reuse the evaporator only, after it's properly cleaned inside. Accumulator are O tube should be replaced due to age.
Re: qwik ac question
The SAME orifice tube for R-12 and R134A? No wonder the new ones don't cool very well. That's a bit if a surprise. The glide on the two gasses are like night and day. With R134A and a pre-EPA expansion rate, half the evaporator is wasted. Sheesh.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 9
From: Kitchener, ON
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: qwik ac question
Both systems are factory R12, the parts are the same. So yes, I suppose you can assume a retrofit in this case.
Re: qwik ac question
Good call, ES. I suppose I shouldn't have assumed a refit, but most shops are pretty scant on R-12, and even the R-414B is getting pricey (and was really not intended for a mobile system), so the most common refrigerant of last resort is 134. It already suffers in performance just by its lower latent heat capacity, thus the comment on the expansion control.
You are correct in that IF R-12 or a good tertiary blend is used, the original sized tube would be more appropriate.
You are correct in that IF R-12 or a good tertiary blend is used, the original sized tube would be more appropriate.
Moderator

Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: qwik ac question
There is no more pure R12 available and any shop that has some isn't allowed to sell it. There are blends out there that work similar to R12 (Duracool etc) but they're just not the same.
A R134 conversion is more preferred unless you know someone who still has some R12 and is willing to sell you a couple of pounds of it for less that $500.
When I converted my 91 pickup truck to R134, I had the ports on the hoses changed instead of using the conversion fittings. I took the lines to an AC shop and they silver soldered the proper R134 ports on. Looked better and no chance of leaks. New accumulator and R134 oil in the compressor and it works fine. Helps to have an AC machine to evac and charge the system properly.
A R134 conversion is more preferred unless you know someone who still has some R12 and is willing to sell you a couple of pounds of it for less that $500.
When I converted my 91 pickup truck to R134, I had the ports on the hoses changed instead of using the conversion fittings. I took the lines to an AC shop and they silver soldered the proper R134 ports on. Looked better and no chance of leaks. New accumulator and R134 oil in the compressor and it works fine. Helps to have an AC machine to evac and charge the system properly.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 16
From: nc
Car: 91RS
Engine: carb'd 357 vortec
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: qwik ac question
When I converted my 91 pickup truck to R134, I had the ports on the hoses changed instead of using the conversion fittings. I took the lines to an AC shop and they silver soldered the proper R134 ports on. Looked better and no chance of leaks. New accumulator and R134 oil in the compressor and it works fine. Helps to have an AC machine to evac and charge the system properly
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








