Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Wow. Yeah I didn't want to order everything and throw those rods in and have them lose or something.
So adding the locks helps bump the lift up from .450 to .500. Would it be safer to get the different springs or same with the springs or locks?
Does milling the heads add more compression?
So adding the locks helps bump the lift up from .450 to .500. Would it be safer to get the different springs or same with the springs or locks?
Does milling the heads add more compression?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
The locks don't bump lift it.. Only the camshaft or rocker arms can do that.. Not trying to be a smartass, just putting clear info out there.
The locks will change the installed height of the valvespring. +.050" locks will give you .050" more clearance between retainer and guide.
Vortec heads are lift limited due to retainer to guide clearance. I have set up many pairs of vortec heads and can tell you, they are not all the same.. I have seen some stock that only had clearance for .450", then I have measured others that gave good clearance for .480" lift.
The stock vortec valve springs are pure trash. The cam kit I linked to for you, already has the springs with it and they are what you need.. Remove the flat inner damper springs out of them before you install. The vortecs have large OD guides and the damper spring will hit, the guides are also so big they kinda act like a damper anyway.
Yes milling heads lowers the chamber size and that will raise compression. Vortecs are listed as 64cc heads but every set I have CC'ed has been 62/63cc
Flat mill .006" = 1cc
The locks will change the installed height of the valvespring. +.050" locks will give you .050" more clearance between retainer and guide.
Vortec heads are lift limited due to retainer to guide clearance. I have set up many pairs of vortec heads and can tell you, they are not all the same.. I have seen some stock that only had clearance for .450", then I have measured others that gave good clearance for .480" lift.
The stock vortec valve springs are pure trash. The cam kit I linked to for you, already has the springs with it and they are what you need.. Remove the flat inner damper springs out of them before you install. The vortecs have large OD guides and the damper spring will hit, the guides are also so big they kinda act like a damper anyway.
Yes milling heads lowers the chamber size and that will raise compression. Vortecs are listed as 64cc heads but every set I have CC'ed has been 62/63cc
Flat mill .006" = 1cc
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Ok no not being a smart *** just me being curious and asking questions to learn more.
So no matter what get the old springs off and have better ones.
Should I get the heads milled to up compression?
So no matter what get the old springs off and have better ones.
Should I get the heads milled to up compression?
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Mose Lake
Car: 86 Z28 T-Top
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: I think 3.73 open dif
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Ya I read the article too but my springs did not fit my heads so I would not consider them a drop in to all vortecs, mine did not fit. I should have took a picture but I was in the middle of the build and it was about 11 at night and I was pissed as all hell. I only have a pic of the new springs in the head after machine work. By boss was .9"
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
No, you shouldn't need to mill the vortec heads. You said you have a stock GM goodwrench engine. Those engines have pistons #12514101 which are around 12cc
Use a fel pro 1094 4.100 x .015 head gaskets and the vortec heads. That will put you around 9.5 to 9.7:1 compression which is right on for a good street engine.
Yeah the vortec springs goes away unless your using a stock low lift cam with like .410" lift or less
Use a fel pro 1094 4.100 x .015 head gaskets and the vortec heads. That will put you around 9.5 to 9.7:1 compression which is right on for a good street engine.
Yeah the vortec springs goes away unless your using a stock low lift cam with like .410" lift or less
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Ya I read the article too but my springs did not fit my heads so I would not consider them a drop in to all vortecs, mine did not fit. I should have took a picture but I was in the middle of the build and it was about 11 at night and I was pissed as all hell. I only have a pic of the new springs in the head after machine work. By boss was .9"
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
No, you shouldn't need to mill the vortec heads. You said you have a stock GM goodwrench engine. Those engines have pistons #12514101 which are around 12cc
Use a fel pro 1094 4.100 x .015 head gaskets and the vortec heads. That will put you around 9.5 to 9.7:1 compression which is right on for a good street engine.
Yeah the vortec springs goes away unless your using a stock low lift cam with like .410" lift or less
Use a fel pro 1094 4.100 x .015 head gaskets and the vortec heads. That will put you around 9.5 to 9.7:1 compression which is right on for a good street engine.
Yeah the vortec springs goes away unless your using a stock low lift cam with like .410" lift or less
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Yep.
At summit $22.97 each (need 2) http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fel-1094/overview/
At CP. $22.99 each (need 2) http://www.competitionproducts.com/F.../#.VOUUkObF_bM
At summit $22.97 each (need 2) http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fel-1094/overview/
At CP. $22.99 each (need 2) http://www.competitionproducts.com/F.../#.VOUUkObF_bM
Supreme Member




Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,528
Likes: 240
From: Henrietta NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Is there anything else you need more or can spend the money on to improve the car?
IMHO aftermarket rocker arms are tuning tools and last ditch effort to get max power out of engine, but it seems like they are one of the 1st things many people add.
For a mild engine, the best rockers on the market is only going to gain you 15-20 HP at the very best and can cost you $300-450. I do not see it worth while untill everything else has been done.
Roller tip rocker arms will not gain you much of anything nor will they help much to reduce wear, stress, etc.. The best thing about them are the facts that they have long slots so you can run into the .500's inch lifts w/o binding on studs and their ratios are true unlike GM stock ones
IMHO aftermarket rocker arms are tuning tools and last ditch effort to get max power out of engine, but it seems like they are one of the 1st things many people add.
For a mild engine, the best rockers on the market is only going to gain you 15-20 HP at the very best and can cost you $300-450. I do not see it worth while untill everything else has been done.
Roller tip rocker arms will not gain you much of anything nor will they help much to reduce wear, stress, etc.. The best thing about them are the facts that they have long slots so you can run into the .500's inch lifts w/o binding on studs and their ratios are true unlike GM stock ones
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Mose Lake
Car: 86 Z28 T-Top
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: I think 3.73 open dif
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
I would get some 1.5 ratio self align roller rockers if you get rockers. Night rider is right there are things you could spend your money more wisely on though. If your running the stock 700R4 it would be money better spent if you modded it a little. A stall converter and shift kit would be better than roller rockers. Nothing more intimidating then your tires chirping when you shift gears.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
You do NOT want to cheap out if/when you buy roller rockers. You can google roller rocker failure and see what I'm talking about. I have seen it 1st hand a few times... It aint pretty.
The cheap, off brand/no name brand rockers are not strong enough and breaks at the fulcrum. When that happens it sends all those tiny steel needle/roller bearings through out your engine, where they destroy your rod/main bearings, oil pump, crank, cam, lifters, etc.
The only full roller rockers I will ever recommend someone to use, or use myself are...
Howards billet alum purple
Scorpion
Harland sharp
Crane gold race
Comp cams ultra gold
Comp cams ultra pro mag
Comp cams
Crower enduro stainless
For roller tip rockers it would be Elgin and Comp cams magnum
You also need to look at type of rockers needed.. You can not double guide your pushrods. If you are using heads like vortecs then they do not use the slot in head to guide the pushrod. The tip of the rocker arm has "tabs" on each side to get the rocker square on valvestem. This is known as a self aligning rocker arm.
You can not use non self aligning rockers on those types of heads, be cause nothing would be there to guide the pushrods/rockers on the valves. You would need to have heads machined to use guide plates.
On the other hand, if you have heads with the guide slots in heads (or guide plates) you can not use a self alining rocker arm as you would be trying to double guide it and cause binding.
Also some heads and valve cover combos will also need a narrow body rocker arm to clear the cover standoffs.
I can not see the rockers real good in your picture but they look to be no name brand, non self aligning, std. or wide body rockers
The cheap, off brand/no name brand rockers are not strong enough and breaks at the fulcrum. When that happens it sends all those tiny steel needle/roller bearings through out your engine, where they destroy your rod/main bearings, oil pump, crank, cam, lifters, etc.
The only full roller rockers I will ever recommend someone to use, or use myself are...
Howards billet alum purple
Scorpion
Harland sharp
Crane gold race
Comp cams ultra gold
Comp cams ultra pro mag
Comp cams
Crower enduro stainless
For roller tip rockers it would be Elgin and Comp cams magnum
You also need to look at type of rockers needed.. You can not double guide your pushrods. If you are using heads like vortecs then they do not use the slot in head to guide the pushrod. The tip of the rocker arm has "tabs" on each side to get the rocker square on valvestem. This is known as a self aligning rocker arm.
You can not use non self aligning rockers on those types of heads, be cause nothing would be there to guide the pushrods/rockers on the valves. You would need to have heads machined to use guide plates.
On the other hand, if you have heads with the guide slots in heads (or guide plates) you can not use a self alining rocker arm as you would be trying to double guide it and cause binding.
Also some heads and valve cover combos will also need a narrow body rocker arm to clear the cover standoffs.
I can not see the rockers real good in your picture but they look to be no name brand, non self aligning, std. or wide body rockers
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Mose Lake
Car: 86 Z28 T-Top
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: I think 3.73 open dif
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Your better off using stock parts than skimping and going cheep. And like niterider said vortecs or center bolt heads need self align rockers and pre 86 heads do not. Don't double guide your rockers either. Those are not self align rockers.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 6
From: knoxville tn
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
I feel that people are only looking at roller rockers from a max lift point of view. without realizing the other benefits of them, such as . reduced friction, lower oil temps, they add stability to the valve train. more accurate valve timing. the point is ,they have a purpose beyond max lift. their benefits go far beyond just that aspect.
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
You do NOT want to cheap out if/when you buy roller rockers. You can google roller rocker failure and see what I'm talking about. I have seen it 1st hand a few times... It aint pretty.
The cheap, off brand/no name brand rockers are not strong enough and breaks at the fulcrum. When that happens it sends all those tiny steel needle/roller bearings through out your engine, where they destroy your rod/main bearings, oil pump, crank, cam, lifters, etc.
The only full roller rockers I will ever recommend someone to use, or use myself are...
Howards billet alum purple
Scorpion
Harland sharp
Crane gold race
Comp cams ultra gold
Comp cams ultra pro mag
Comp cams
Crower enduro stainless
For roller tip rockers it would be Elgin and Comp cams magnum
You also need to look at type of rockers needed.. You can not double guide your pushrods. If you are using heads like vortecs then they do not use the slot in head to guide the pushrod. The tip of the rocker arm has "tabs" on each side to get the rocker square on valvestem. This is known as a self aligning rocker arm.
You can not use non self aligning rockers on those types of heads, be cause nothing would be there to guide the pushrods/rockers on the valves. You would need to have heads machined to use guide plates.
On the other hand, if you have heads with the guide slots in heads (or guide plates) you can not use a self alining rocker arm as you would be trying to double guide it and cause binding.
Also some heads and valve cover combos will also need a narrow body rocker arm to clear the cover standoffs.
I can not see the rockers real good in your picture but they look to be no name brand, non self aligning, std. or wide body rockers
The cheap, off brand/no name brand rockers are not strong enough and breaks at the fulcrum. When that happens it sends all those tiny steel needle/roller bearings through out your engine, where they destroy your rod/main bearings, oil pump, crank, cam, lifters, etc.
The only full roller rockers I will ever recommend someone to use, or use myself are...
Howards billet alum purple
Scorpion
Harland sharp
Crane gold race
Comp cams ultra gold
Comp cams ultra pro mag
Comp cams
Crower enduro stainless
For roller tip rockers it would be Elgin and Comp cams magnum
You also need to look at type of rockers needed.. You can not double guide your pushrods. If you are using heads like vortecs then they do not use the slot in head to guide the pushrod. The tip of the rocker arm has "tabs" on each side to get the rocker square on valvestem. This is known as a self aligning rocker arm.
You can not use non self aligning rockers on those types of heads, be cause nothing would be there to guide the pushrods/rockers on the valves. You would need to have heads machined to use guide plates.
On the other hand, if you have heads with the guide slots in heads (or guide plates) you can not use a self alining rocker arm as you would be trying to double guide it and cause binding.
Also some heads and valve cover combos will also need a narrow body rocker arm to clear the cover standoffs.
I can not see the rockers real good in your picture but they look to be no name brand, non self aligning, std. or wide body rockers
Knight rider, 10second hopeful do you know off the top of your head what the valve sizes are on the 062 vortec heads?
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
What about some recommended roller rockers?
I found this carb, with electric or manual choke? Is this the right one? I know we were talking about 650cfm.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/.../thunder.shtml
I found this carb, with electric or manual choke? Is this the right one? I know we were talking about 650cfm.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/.../thunder.shtml
Last edited by tbroherd; Feb 23, 2015 at 10:22 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
1.94/1.50" valves, 11/32" stem on the vortec heads.. Do not think the "small" valves are a bad thing. The 1.94/1.50" valve size is fine for 450 HP and under.
Rusty.. I well aware of all the benifits from rocker arms, and I never mentioned anything about peak lift.
I still stand behind what I said.. You will only gain 10-20 HP at very best from them. Stability is NOT an issue on mild engines and really a 7/16" stud should be the 1st thing you look at for stability on higher HP/higher RPM engines even before the rockers.
I look at the bang for the buck.. $300 for 15 HP with rockers is not a good deal UNLESS everything else has been took care of.
I built my car in 2004. Street and track use since, it was just in 2009 that I went to roller rockers. Even still the main reason for that was stud size. I upgraded alot of parts, went with a 249/252@.050" .570"/.579" lift solid cam and needed 7/16" rocker studs. At that point, you have to have new rockers so I went with a full roller rocker.
Don't get me wrong... I do think roller rockers are better and a needed thing but at what point.. If you still have stock Y pipe, or manifolds, or stock intake, crappy heads, low compression, high gear, open rear, stock torque converter, etc etc etc then work on those items 1st as you will see bigger gains from those, then look at the high dollar, small power gain items like roller rockers
Rusty.. I well aware of all the benifits from rocker arms, and I never mentioned anything about peak lift.
I still stand behind what I said.. You will only gain 10-20 HP at very best from them. Stability is NOT an issue on mild engines and really a 7/16" stud should be the 1st thing you look at for stability on higher HP/higher RPM engines even before the rockers.
I look at the bang for the buck.. $300 for 15 HP with rockers is not a good deal UNLESS everything else has been took care of.
I built my car in 2004. Street and track use since, it was just in 2009 that I went to roller rockers. Even still the main reason for that was stud size. I upgraded alot of parts, went with a 249/252@.050" .570"/.579" lift solid cam and needed 7/16" rocker studs. At that point, you have to have new rockers so I went with a full roller rocker.
Don't get me wrong... I do think roller rockers are better and a needed thing but at what point.. If you still have stock Y pipe, or manifolds, or stock intake, crappy heads, low compression, high gear, open rear, stock torque converter, etc etc etc then work on those items 1st as you will see bigger gains from those, then look at the high dollar, small power gain items like roller rockers
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
What about some recommended roller rockers?
I found this carb, with electric or manual choke? Is this the right one? I know we were talking about 650cfm.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/.../thunder.shtml
I found this carb, with electric or manual choke? Is this the right one? I know we were talking about 650cfm.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/.../thunder.shtml
Howards billet alum purple
Scorpion
Harland sharp
Crane gold race
Comp cams ultra gold
Comp cams ultra pro mag
Comp cams
Crower enduro stainless
For roller tip rockers it would be Elgin and Comp cams magnum.
I used Elgin stamp steel roller tips on my camaro egine from 2004 to 2009, I'm running Howards billet alum full rollers on my camaro since 2009.
I'm running comp cams magnum roller tip rockers on my V8 S10.
The reason for the elgins and comp roller tips.. I already had the Elgins so I used what I had.
Then when I built my S10's engine I picked up used vortec heads as a package deal. Got heads, comp roller tip rockers, performer intake, chrome valve covers for $350.
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Ok... Your looking for a budget minded build so I will post links to my recommended
budget based parts that would work good for you.
Vortec heads... Stock valves, don't go trying to install larger valves or what not. The vortec head as is, is the highest flow, best production (stock factory) gen 1 sbc head ever
Any of these intakes would work great
http://www.competitionproducts.com/P.../#.VNry6ubF_bM
http://www.competitionproducts.com/P.../#.VNry8ubF_bM
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-226018/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/wnd-8121/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/pfs-52028/overview/
If it was me, I would go with that last one, crosswinds for $176
Cam... Here is what I recommend.. http://www.competitionproducts.com/E.../#.VNr08ebF_bM $147 cam, lifters, springs, valve locks, valve seals.
This is a 214/224@.050" cam which is a nice mild performance size. It will give a slight lope only enough to tell it's not stock. Makes a lot of low and mid range power and will pull good to about 5300 rpm.
I have used that very cam in quite a few 350 engines.
Run a 600 cfm carb. Holley or edelbrock, your pick. I really like Edelbrock carbs for street engines. I have an edelbrock 600 on my vortec headed 355 in my S10, and have a Holley 750 on my Brodix headed 355 in my camaro.
Use Fel pro MS 98000 T intake gaskets, Fel pro 1094 head gaskets
With a set of 1-5/8" tube headers and good aftermarket Y pipe and exhaust this will be a mean street engine. In the 350-375 HP range easy.
budget based parts that would work good for you.
Vortec heads... Stock valves, don't go trying to install larger valves or what not. The vortec head as is, is the highest flow, best production (stock factory) gen 1 sbc head ever
Any of these intakes would work great
http://www.competitionproducts.com/P.../#.VNry6ubF_bM
http://www.competitionproducts.com/P.../#.VNry8ubF_bM
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-226018/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/wnd-8121/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/pfs-52028/overview/
If it was me, I would go with that last one, crosswinds for $176
Cam... Here is what I recommend.. http://www.competitionproducts.com/E.../#.VNr08ebF_bM $147 cam, lifters, springs, valve locks, valve seals.
This is a 214/224@.050" cam which is a nice mild performance size. It will give a slight lope only enough to tell it's not stock. Makes a lot of low and mid range power and will pull good to about 5300 rpm.
I have used that very cam in quite a few 350 engines.
Run a 600 cfm carb. Holley or edelbrock, your pick. I really like Edelbrock carbs for street engines. I have an edelbrock 600 on my vortec headed 355 in my S10, and have a Holley 750 on my Brodix headed 355 in my camaro.
Use Fel pro MS 98000 T intake gaskets, Fel pro 1094 head gaskets
With a set of 1-5/8" tube headers and good aftermarket Y pipe and exhaust this will be a mean street engine. In the 350-375 HP range easy.
So what ratio are we shooting for? These arent too expensive
http://www.summitracing.com/search?S...0tip%20rockers
Ill figure out what length pushrods I need when I get the pushrod checker in the mail
Last edited by tbroherd; Feb 24, 2015 at 03:50 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Building an engine. I need help, I am a novice builder
Everyone should sell them. I bought my last few sets at advance auto parts. It's one of the high $$ options that pulls up when they put in any of the vortec truck 5.7L. I tell them 1997 chevy 1500 truck with the 5.7L engine.
Here you go.. Just about any place you want to buy from
http://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/f...0-t/15780793-P
http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/de...yword=ms98000t
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fel-ms98000t
http://www.autozone.com/external-eng...gasket/615359/
http://www.rockauto.com/dbphp/x,cata..._MS98000T.html
Here you go.. Just about any place you want to buy from
http://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/f...0-t/15780793-P
http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/de...yword=ms98000t
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fel-ms98000t
http://www.autozone.com/external-eng...gasket/615359/
http://www.rockauto.com/dbphp/x,cata..._MS98000T.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




