89 trans am 350 tpi stock
10-23-2018, 12:02 PM
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,694
Received 747 Likes
on
506 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: 89 trans am 350 tpi stock
If its a dual cat car it was supposed to have 235.
10-23-2018, 12:07 PM
#4
Re: 89 trans am 350 tpi stock
Yeah it depends on the option packages. Not that there's a great difference. Good numbers for their day. Pretty pathetic now. There's PLENTY of V6 minivans with more HP..... actually most of them I think. They just don't have the potential of an F body. At least not for the same dollar-per-HP figures. The attractive quality of the F body is the inexpensive upgrade path being it uses essentially 1950's technology.
Oh - and life's too short to stay stock. So those numbers mean nothing.
GD
Oh - and life's too short to stay stock. So those numbers mean nothing.
GD
10-23-2018, 09:39 PM
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: 89 trans am 350 tpi stock
It's always been funny to me someone with a 230 horsepower car will completely dog out a 170 horsepower car when honestly they are both pretty tame. Don't get me wrong I will never replace a 305 with another 305 because I love the torque of the 350. I also think all these Third gens should have had 350s. At east the 4th gens got that right.
10-23-2018, 09:52 PM
#6
Re: 89 trans am 350 tpi stock
Stomp it off the line at a light and enjoy the torque dude. Who cares about HP. Unless you live next to a track or regularly race Acuras on the highway the hp starts mattering right around the point where the cops take your car away.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AaronIROCZ
Aftermarket Product Review
4
06-05-2001 10:20 PM
BrianB
Aftermarket Product Review
6
06-02-2001 03:10 PM