me vs. satilac
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: clarksville, tn
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
me vs. satilac
what do you guys think the outcome will be with me vs. a mid 90s or so saturn SE2 auto (i think it might be twin cam, not sure) that is bone stock except for a catback exhaust. my car is also bone stock except for k&n (not really a mod) and shift kit, also my car is in excellent shape, no problems whatsoever. i have raced a friends firebird that runs mid 15s consistently and i hung with him pretty good till about 3rd, and i only lost by a couple or cars so, so im estimating my car is a high 15, 16 flat car. so what are your opinions on the outcome?
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Is there anything special about a SE2 over a normal Saturn twin cam.
I give the race to you, just cause I can't see a Saturn near stock beating you. could be wrong though.
I give the race to you, just cause I can't see a Saturn near stock beating you. could be wrong though.
yea man saturns are slow. period. up until recently, they never were much on acceleration. they still aren't all that quick, unless you throw in a turbo (which i plan on doing some day...)
ha, i actually searched and found a saturn performance message board. you'd be surprised how many people turbocharge those suckers.
but seriously, unless your car has been castrated or you really really suck at driving and whoever drives the saturn is really really good, you will win
ha, i actually searched and found a saturn performance message board. you'd be surprised how many people turbocharge those suckers.
but seriously, unless your car has been castrated or you really really suck at driving and whoever drives the saturn is really really good, you will win
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





