84z l69 vs 88 iroc who would win
Re: 84z l69 vs 88 iroc who would win
Originally posted by jocww
who would win a 5.0 l69 stick vs a 5.7 iroc
who would win a 5.0 l69 stick vs a 5.7 iroc
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
they have all the power listings for our cars, very useful :P
-fly
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
I don't know about all of this IROC beats it stuff. Lets all just remember that the L69 in '84 with a 5 speed always got 3.73 gears and an IROC at best had 3.27 but non-G92 cars have 2.77's. The L69 only had 190hp but the IROC only had 230 hp but I think that a stick and a better rear might be able to beat the IROC. But put a decent driver behind the IROC and a great driver behind the L69 my $ is on the L69 (5 speeds are cool and 3.73's are a heaven sent).
All IMO, Later, Garrett
All IMO, Later, Garrett
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Come on give me a break here I love to cheer on the underdog. All I have to do is leave out certain pieces of information (not lie just leave out) like the huge torque advantage. But still I think it would be closer than most people think.
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Come on you guys the '84 Z with a L69 and a 5 speed was good for low 15's even a few high 14's. And I know that a stock '88 IROC is a mid to high 14's car and that with 3.27's, what if the car had 2.77's I think that it's not as easy as saying IROC wins.
There's more to a car than Engine hp and torque, I had rather have a stock engine with a great tranny and rear than the other way around. And come on let's face it a 700Rcrap isn't as good as a T-5 and don't even compare 3.73's to 2.77's. IROC doesn't automatically win.
IROC are not gold plated awsome kings, give some respect to the older Z's they've earned it.
However IROC probably does win Probably !!
Later, Garrett
There's more to a car than Engine hp and torque, I had rather have a stock engine with a great tranny and rear than the other way around. And come on let's face it a 700Rcrap isn't as good as a T-5 and don't even compare 3.73's to 2.77's. IROC doesn't automatically win.
IROC are not gold plated awsome kings, give some respect to the older Z's they've earned it.
However IROC probably does win Probably !!
Later, Garrett
Come on give me a break here I love to cheer on the underdog. All I have to do is leave out certain pieces of information (not lie just leave out) like the huge torque advantage. But still I think it would be closer than most people think.
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
i don't give a ****. I know my L03 is slow, thats the point of moding, and rebuilding.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
well im talkin stock for stock not modded i can even mod a stupid topaz to beat a corvette if i had enuff money but since my car is stock cept for a aluminum radiator and a 5inch monster tach
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
Originally posted by jocww
well im talkin stock for stock not modded i can even mod a stupid topaz to beat a corvette if i had enuff money but since my car is stock cept for a aluminum radiator and a 5inch monster tach
well im talkin stock for stock not modded i can even mod a stupid topaz to beat a corvette if i had enuff money but since my car is stock cept for a aluminum radiator and a 5inch monster tach
or a pinto
or a monza
yep. a vett, need about 200 shot of NOS, turbo charger.. :P
stock to stock i don't think the 5.0 would win..
my car is stock except for the K&N filters, and aluminum radiator.
-fly
stock to stock i don't think the 5.0 would win..
my car is stock except for the K&N filters, and aluminum radiator.
-fly
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
Come on you guys the '84 Z with a L69 and a 5 speed was good for low 15's even a few high 14's. And I know that a stock '88 IROC is a mid to high 14's car and that with 3.27's, what if the car had 2.77's I think that it's not as easy as saying IROC wins.
There's more to a car than Engine hp and torque, I had rather have a stock engine with a great tranny and rear than the other way around. And come on let's face it a 700Rcrap isn't as good as a T-5 and don't even compare 3.73's to 2.77's. IROC doesn't automatically win.
IROC are not gold plated awsome kings, give some respect to the older Z's they've earned it.
However IROC probably does win Probably !!
Later, Garrett
Come on you guys the '84 Z with a L69 and a 5 speed was good for low 15's even a few high 14's. And I know that a stock '88 IROC is a mid to high 14's car and that with 3.27's, what if the car had 2.77's I think that it's not as easy as saying IROC wins.
There's more to a car than Engine hp and torque, I had rather have a stock engine with a great tranny and rear than the other way around. And come on let's face it a 700Rcrap isn't as good as a T-5 and don't even compare 3.73's to 2.77's. IROC doesn't automatically win.
IROC are not gold plated awsome kings, give some respect to the older Z's they've earned it.
However IROC probably does win Probably !!
Later, Garrett
No L69 stock did 14s. They were low 15s at best.
Only 3rd gens to break the 14 barrier at least were 350s, 305/5spd G92 option, TTA and Firehawk.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Well when I said few I meant like 2, I'm sure a few ran 14's
, But still Mark you can't tell me that a stock '88 IROC with 2.77's is a high 14's car, it's not it's low 15's. And you said that the L69 is a low 15's, there it is a rather close race, Equal drivers I give it to the IROC but the IROC doesn't always win a better driver in the L69 and we have a race.
Later, Garrett
, But still Mark you can't tell me that a stock '88 IROC with 2.77's is a high 14's car, it's not it's low 15's. And you said that the L69 is a low 15's, there it is a rather close race, Equal drivers I give it to the IROC but the IROC doesn't always win a better driver in the L69 and we have a race.Later, Garrett
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
Well when I said few I meant like 2, I'm sure a few ran 14's
, But still Mark you can't tell me that a stock '88 IROC with 2.77's is a high 14's car, it's not it's low 15's. And you said that the L69 is a low 15's, there it is a rather close race, Equal drivers I give it to the IROC but the IROC doesn't always win a better driver in the L69 and we have a race.
Later, Garrett
Well when I said few I meant like 2, I'm sure a few ran 14's
, But still Mark you can't tell me that a stock '88 IROC with 2.77's is a high 14's car, it's not it's low 15's. And you said that the L69 is a low 15's, there it is a rather close race, Equal drivers I give it to the IROC but the IROC doesn't always win a better driver in the L69 and we have a race.Later, Garrett
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Yes Mark I understand that an '88 350 TPI will run a 14.7 however, you need to be more specific that is with 3.27 gears and what I am saying is that if the IROC had 2.77's instead of the 3.27's the L69 Camaro would have a pretty good fighting chance. I know that an '88 with a 3.27 rear wouldn't even be worth racing an L69. However my whole point has been the fact that the 2.77's suck!!!!!!!! and the 3.73's are awesome in the L69.
Later, Garrett
Later, Garrett
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4
Yes Mark I understand that an '88 350 TPI will run a 14.7 however, you need to be more specific that is with 3.27 gears and what I am saying is that if the IROC had 2.77's instead of the 3.27's the L69 Camaro would have a pretty good fighting chance. I know that an '88 with a 3.27 rear wouldn't even be worth racing an L69. However my whole point has been the fact that the 2.77's suck!!!!!!!! and the 3.73's are awesome in the L69.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by curt86iroc
true, but you have to factor in the 700-r4's deep first gear. with 2.77 a 350 iroc will still run high 14's. i have never seen a bone stock L69 t5 in the 14's even with the 3.73's. dont get me wrong, i love the L69 and would take it any day over the L98 but i still think if both cars had the same driver skill the L98 will win.
true, but you have to factor in the 700-r4's deep first gear. with 2.77 a 350 iroc will still run high 14's. i have never seen a bone stock L69 t5 in the 14's even with the 3.73's. dont get me wrong, i love the L69 and would take it any day over the L98 but i still think if both cars had the same driver skill the L98 will win.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4
carbs = good
TPI = not as good
i dunno. yes, you always could convert an L98 to a carb, but still. with bolt ons the L69 could hid mid 14's and with some heads and a cam solid 13's with ease.
TPI = not as good
i dunno. yes, you always could convert an L98 to a carb, but still. with bolt ons the L69 could hid mid 14's and with some heads and a cam solid 13's with ease.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
Car: '02 Rodeo
Engine: 3.2 V6 DOHC
Transmission: 5spd
Axle/Gears: 4.30 Dana 44 Rear 10 bolt front
i thought that all of the L98 cars had 3.27 gears. i've never heard of a 2.77 geared L98, but maybe i'm wrong.
i think that hands down the L98 will win, provided that both cars are stock and the 350 is in tune.
the L69 would have a chance, but would have to pull off a perfect launch, shift points, etc. and the 350 would have to spin off the line.
i think that hands down the L98 will win, provided that both cars are stock and the 350 is in tune.
the L69 would have a chance, but would have to pull off a perfect launch, shift points, etc. and the 350 would have to spin off the line.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by costill91Z
i thought that all of the L98 cars had 3.27 gears. i've never heard of a 2.77 geared L98, but maybe i'm wrong.
i thought that all of the L98 cars had 3.27 gears. i've never heard of a 2.77 geared L98, but maybe i'm wrong.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
An IROC-Z28 350 TPI will run low 14's with G92. Yes the other Z28's are cool, I also like the 82-84 Z28's alot, but in performance the IROC-Z's do everything better. Looks is opinion I guess, but I think they kinda look better too.
Originally posted by costill91Z
i thought that all of the L98 cars had 3.27 gears. i've never heard of a 2.77 geared L98, but maybe i'm wrong.
i think that hands down the L98 will win, provided that both cars are stock and the 350 is in tune.
the L69 would have a chance, but would have to pull off a perfect launch, shift points, etc. and the 350 would have to spin off the line.
i thought that all of the L98 cars had 3.27 gears. i've never heard of a 2.77 geared L98, but maybe i'm wrong.
i think that hands down the L98 will win, provided that both cars are stock and the 350 is in tune.
the L69 would have a chance, but would have to pull off a perfect launch, shift points, etc. and the 350 would have to spin off the line.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by fly89gta
why couldn't an Iroc come with a T5?
why couldn't an Iroc come with a T5?
He either means a 5spd 350 combo, or knows nothing about these cars.
Oh, and to the earlier comment about having an L69 cause of carb. What you said makes no sense, you say heads/cam or whatever and low 14s. Well a stock TPI 350 is a mid 14 car. By the time you throw all those mods onto an L69 to run 13s, you'll have a 12 sec 350tpi.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Chevy Cavalier
Engine: 2.2
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: it's part of the transmission
I never intended to get too wild with my L69 car, yes they do have 3.73, even the autos. you can have some fun with that motor. I've heard that carb and ignition mods (on the existing setup) alone will squeeze another 25 horse from there.
lose the "air silencer" the little chocking screen thing in the air cleaner.
get a K&N and dual snorkel and/or make sure the cowl vent is working.
hedmen shorty headers, easy to install. Highflow cat and cat back, all mandrel bent.
an intake wouldn't hurt, but the stock aluminum one isn't that bad. maybee port it.
the 305 HO has 9.5:1 compression and a better cam than a non HO, I think compucam has a 2030 grind I've heard works very well with the L69.
my car always responded well to a slight timing advance.
finding a set of V-belt underdrive pulley would work well to.
although my favorite all time mod: 16x8" rims w/ 245/50/16 tires and hotchkis rear end stabilizing and traction kit. at stock spring hieght, I could not get my wheels to spin!!.....and the auburn posi unit w/3.73 richmond gear helped some too!
good luck beating a TPI 5.7....maybee with some NO2 or something.
lose the "air silencer" the little chocking screen thing in the air cleaner.
get a K&N and dual snorkel and/or make sure the cowl vent is working.
hedmen shorty headers, easy to install. Highflow cat and cat back, all mandrel bent.
an intake wouldn't hurt, but the stock aluminum one isn't that bad. maybee port it.
the 305 HO has 9.5:1 compression and a better cam than a non HO, I think compucam has a 2030 grind I've heard works very well with the L69.
my car always responded well to a slight timing advance.
finding a set of V-belt underdrive pulley would work well to.
although my favorite all time mod: 16x8" rims w/ 245/50/16 tires and hotchkis rear end stabilizing and traction kit. at stock spring hieght, I could not get my wheels to spin!!.....and the auburn posi unit w/3.73 richmond gear helped some too!
good luck beating a TPI 5.7....maybee with some NO2 or something.
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
No L69 stock did 14s. They were low 15s at best.
Only 3rd gens to break the 14 barrier at least were 350s, 305/5spd G92 option, TTA and Firehawk.
No L69 stock did 14s. They were low 15s at best.
Only 3rd gens to break the 14 barrier at least were 350s, 305/5spd G92 option, TTA and Firehawk.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by IROCThe5.7L
A L98 with the 2.77's will still hit 14's.
A L98 with the 2.77's will still hit 14's.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
i have a dual snorkel already. so all i can do now is exhaust. what did u say about doing stuff to my carb and distributor
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by jocww
i have a dual snorkel already. so all i can do now is exhaust. what did u say about doing stuff to my carb and distributor
i have a dual snorkel already. so all i can do now is exhaust. what did u say about doing stuff to my carb and distributor
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Chevy Cavalier
Engine: 2.2
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: it's part of the transmission
the L98 is cool, that doesn't mean the L69 is no fun to play. sure, the L98 has some ballzy torque, the L69 won't match the torque, but it sure likes to rev!
ditching the computer is a mistake in most cases, a good working q-jet will deliver economy and performance = street drivability
advancing the timing is one way, I never messed with the aftermarket HEI (high enrgy igniton) it's your stock electronic ignition, but I did replace everything exept the distributer itself. new plugs,wires, cap & rotor, and ignition module. no need for fancy stuff, just QUALITY replacement stuff. I'm sure the Accel and other brand name stuff can't hurt, but ignition is ignition in most cases, and your looking for bang for the buck.
you need to visit the q-jet boards!!!! change the rods & hangers!!
now that I remember, Pontiac magazine did "project: traithalon thrash" with an '84. they did get some kind of 14 sec time from it with like 175k on the clock!!!
if you have the money and patience (one equals the other) to install or have a cam installed, you will love it....no bolt on crap is going to do what a cam does. BTW the stock exaust is very good on those cars.
ditching the computer is a mistake in most cases, a good working q-jet will deliver economy and performance = street drivability
advancing the timing is one way, I never messed with the aftermarket HEI (high enrgy igniton) it's your stock electronic ignition, but I did replace everything exept the distributer itself. new plugs,wires, cap & rotor, and ignition module. no need for fancy stuff, just QUALITY replacement stuff. I'm sure the Accel and other brand name stuff can't hurt, but ignition is ignition in most cases, and your looking for bang for the buck.
you need to visit the q-jet boards!!!! change the rods & hangers!!
now that I remember, Pontiac magazine did "project: traithalon thrash" with an '84. they did get some kind of 14 sec time from it with like 175k on the clock!!!
if you have the money and patience (one equals the other) to install or have a cam installed, you will love it....no bolt on crap is going to do what a cam does. BTW the stock exaust is very good on those cars.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by jocww
u made a post in the carb section
u made a post in the carb section
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Good point junkyardog, but patience doesn't equal money, but with money you don't have to worry about patience
.
Anyways the reason some one would take a L69 over a L98 in a race is beyond me. If you read my posts I never said an L69 would beat a 5.7 IROC I just said it would be closer than most people think.
But to tell you the truth I may actually take an L69 over an IROC 5.7 for 2 simple reasons. 1 sentimental value (my '84 406 car was an L69 when I bought it). and 2 Hello 5 speed , way more fun than just putting it in D (or OD) and going.
Later, Garrett
.Anyways the reason some one would take a L69 over a L98 in a race is beyond me. If you read my posts I never said an L69 would beat a 5.7 IROC I just said it would be closer than most people think.
But to tell you the truth I may actually take an L69 over an IROC 5.7 for 2 simple reasons. 1 sentimental value (my '84 406 car was an L69 when I bought it). and 2 Hello 5 speed , way more fun than just putting it in D (or OD) and going.
Later, Garrett
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
can i just bore engine would it beat the 5.7 if i put a 350 crank and bore it out
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
No, boring and stroking a 305 is like having sex with your cousin, sure it would be fun and different but It's Just Wrong. This conversation has been brought up many times and every time the results are the same if you want to go fast cheap (not saying a 305 can't be fast) get yourself a 350 or 400.
Plus a 5 speed w/ 3.73's backing up a 406 (.030 bored 400 ) goes like a raped ape.
Later, Garrett
Plus a 5 speed w/ 3.73's backing up a 406 (.030 bored 400 ) goes like a raped ape.
Later, Garrett







