91 auto z28 vs 97 stang v6????
10-14-2002, 10:24 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: maryland
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
91 auto z28 vs 97 stang v6????
the z28 has slp headers and hooker catback and sfcs
all the rest stock. (305) and the stang is v6 and has intake and borla side exhaust. who would win?
all the rest stock. (305) and the stang is v6 and has intake and borla side exhaust. who would win?
10-15-2002, 09:19 AM
#4
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those years of Mustangs are even sadder than the lt1-body v-6 Camaros. Considering that the Stang is an auto, I would say he would hit low/mid 16's or so w/o mods. That is what I have seen the average driver hit, of course the guy did have a 4'' cowl hood, which was pretty funny after seeing him run. They have 150 hp, and 215 torque and weigh 3100 or so w/o driver. So I would say that the Mustang might break low 16's. Now if it was a bright yellow, than that adds 150 hp.
Now that I think about, the Brute Force has 5 more hp than a Mustang.
The only way the Camaro would loose, if the Camaro driver had a heart attack at the wheel, but still if he kept his foot on the gas he would win.
Now that I think about, the Brute Force has 5 more hp than a Mustang.
The only way the Camaro would loose, if the Camaro driver had a heart attack at the wheel, but still if he kept his foot on the gas he would win.
10-15-2002, 10:12 AM
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by cridom
so should i race him?????????
so should i race him?????????
You'll kill him.
Trending Topics
10-16-2002, 09:08 AM
#9
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I wouldn't even bother racing him, it would be a complete waste of gas. Those 94-98 stangs aren't much faster than my 92 3.1. So, think of it this way, would you be afraid of losing to a 3.1 RS? LOL no way you'll kill him by a ridiculous amount.
10-16-2002, 02:35 PM
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1997 with those mods is slow. A 1999-2000 with those mods could be in the low 15s high 14s with a 5-speed. With an auto it would be solidly in the mid 15s! The new Mustangs and the older ones (V6) are not even close as far as peformance. Like the 3.8 and the 3.4!!!
The newer ones would be a good run, but the older one would be all yours!
The newer ones would be a good run, but the older one would be all yours!
10-16-2002, 03:39 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Revere, MA
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 91 auto z28 vs 97 stang v6????
Originally posted by cridom
the stang is v6 and has intake and borla side exhaust. who would win?
the stang is v6 and has intake and borla side exhaust. who would win?
Intake (really just a chrome tube) = + 0.5HP = 140.5HP
Borla side exhaust = - 20ft/lbs TQ = less torque than my grandmothers gerry-cart
Last edited by Mustang5L5; 10-16-2002 at 03:42 PM.
10-16-2002, 06:10 PM
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: maryland
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so how much hp has gt stang with the new form?
can i get him?
how fast should i be with hooker catback and slp headers w/y pipe on my 305 tpi automatic tranny??
auto tranny stang's are faster than manual?
can i get him?
how fast should i be with hooker catback and slp headers w/y pipe on my 305 tpi automatic tranny??
auto tranny stang's are faster than manual?
10-16-2002, 06:17 PM
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so how much hp has gt stang with the new form?
10-16-2002, 06:22 PM
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by 5.0mustang
I don't understand this, but as far as the auto vs stick, there is no contest a stick Mustang will walk circles around an auto, no questions!
I don't understand this, but as far as the auto vs stick, there is no contest a stick Mustang will walk circles around an auto, no questions!
10-16-2002, 07:17 PM
#17
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: maryland
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i mean v6's how much hp? and how many seconds u think my car runs with a 305 tpi auto and hooker catback and slp headers/ w y pipe?
can i get a 99-00? with intake and borla?
can i get a 99-00? with intake and borla?
10-16-2002, 07:38 PM
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The V6s had 195 I believe and ran around 15.5 stock! With those mods I would say he would be good for a 15.0-15.4!
You should be right around there also, making an interesting race!
You should be right around there also, making an interesting race!
10-19-2002, 10:54 PM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
V6 Mustangs of that year were nothing as a performance car. According to my calculations, unless those mods added alot, he's running 17s. He probably would be stock.
That year had 150 hp, and when the power went up, 190. Something like that.
A stock 97 would have his hands full against my Topaz or my Crown Vic.
That year had 150 hp, and when the power went up, 190. Something like that.
A stock 97 would have his hands full against my Topaz or my Crown Vic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
