I beat an SS
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: KC MO
Car: 85Z28
Engine: TPI355,383LT4
Transmission: 700-R4,T-56
I beat an SS
I was recentlry thinking about buying an new ss our ws6 trans am but now after beating one i dont now any one got some specs on these i think it was a 6 spd the way he was jumpin when he shifted i didnt beat him bad but was pulling away from him the whole time
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: KC MO
Car: 85Z28
Engine: TPI355,383LT4
Transmission: 700-R4,T-56
well tons but ill give you the basics 355 speed pro hyperetic pistons 9.7 cam .488 intake .510 exaust edelbrock aluminum head performer rpm aluminum water pump headers bla bla bla b&m shifter lots i was surprised
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,TN
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Those cars are pretty quick, nice kill!!! I think the stock specs are 0-60 in like 5.4 and 1/4 mile of like anywhere from 13.2 to 14.2(basically depends on driver), but anyways it's always nice to see the look on those guys faces when they spent around 25k for their cars, and we only pay w/ the right mods around probably 5-10k and can hand their a$$es to them. Swwweeet kill once again!!!!
They're quick from the factory, but far from untouchable. Sounds like you got a nice setup. I bet they'd make a nice daily driver, but I'm a poor college student so I'll stick with my good ol' 91.
People claim they can run into the 12's stock, but I've never seen it. Mid to high 13s seems to be the norm with good drivers and decent conditions. Since these cars run anywhere from "12.9" to mid 14's stock, your built 355 seems pretty strong now, eh?
This part is only from what I've heard and read, no first hand experience: They dyno between 285 and 310 horses stock. I've read of higher numbers too, but they've probably been "tweeked" a bit. (The motor not the numbers.) Or maybe they're just broken in better. (My personal opinion/guess.)
Laters.
People claim they can run into the 12's stock, but I've never seen it. Mid to high 13s seems to be the norm with good drivers and decent conditions. Since these cars run anywhere from "12.9" to mid 14's stock, your built 355 seems pretty strong now, eh?
This part is only from what I've heard and read, no first hand experience: They dyno between 285 and 310 horses stock. I've read of higher numbers too, but they've probably been "tweeked" a bit. (The motor not the numbers.) Or maybe they're just broken in better. (My personal opinion/guess.)
Laters.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
If it was one of the newer SS's then it has around 325 horses. and the WS6 is the same. I have always loved those cars, They are very quick right out of the factory. Your car must be pretty quick to be able to beat one.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
I'd say find a used one for a good price and keep your car. I love my TA but didn't have the heart to get rid of both my IROC's for it so I sold the 87 and kept the 89
now I can hang with both crowds
Oh, nice kill btw!!
now I can hang with both crowds
Oh, nice kill btw!!
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!!!
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 305 L69
Transmission: 5 spd
haha nice kill man!....but i was just reading.....did i see 3rdGenBlackBird
say "eh?" i just found it funny cuz im Canadian and we always get made fun of but its nice to know someone else says "eh" too!...i to am i fan of the SS and the WS6 ls1 t/a......but i do love my thirdgen.
say "eh?" i just found it funny cuz im Canadian and we always get made fun of but its nice to know someone else says "eh" too!...i to am i fan of the SS and the WS6 ls1 t/a......but i do love my thirdgen.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Fear the modded LS1. Tru you may pay between 7k and 20k for a used one depending on condition but you are starting with a 300rwhp car to begin with. A car that idles smooth like glass and knocks off 28 to 30 mpg on the highway. The 325hp rating that GM gives those cars is pure garbage and they put out about 350 to the crank. Check out over on www.ls1.com and see some of the times and numbers people are putting down with only a mod or two. Plenty of guys running a lid, catback and some drag radials running anywhere from 12.88 to 13.00 flat. Others who have full exhausts are putting up to 350 to the wheels with the stock cam, heads and tune. Many have hit high 11's with just a big ol' shot of giggle juice and some traction. You must have a really strong car there because an LS1 is no joke.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Car: 1992 z-28
Engine: L-98
Transmission: 700R4
Good kill on the SS my man. I owned a 2000 ss Z with the 6 speed..very fast car. I sold the car but before I sold it I had my wife hop in the 92 Z and I jumped behind the wheel in the 2000. Well I tell you what I was very surprised how well the 92 hung in there with the SS..The wife took me out of the hole and had me by about a car length until the SS came into it's powerband..then it was all over. I did win the race but a 3rd gen properly modded can haul the mail no doubt. 92 mods..Borla..K&N filters..Airfoil..Hyper-crap chip. Not hating on the 4th gen..Beautiful cars..But the 3rd gen aint no joke. Later fellas.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
Re: I beat an SS
Originally posted by 5.7Camaroboy
I was recentlry thinking about buying an new ss our ws6 trans am but now after beating one i dont now any one got some specs on these i think it was a 6 spd the way he was jumpin when he shifted i didnt beat him bad but was pulling away from him the whole time
I was recentlry thinking about buying an new ss our ws6 trans am but now after beating one i dont now any one got some specs on these i think it was a 6 spd the way he was jumpin when he shifted i didnt beat him bad but was pulling away from him the whole time
Although from the mods you say you have I'm thinking you have a runner there
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
How did the race start? How long did it last? What speeds was this race into?
I've ran a best of 13.0 @ 111 with just a catback, lid, free mods, and drag radails -bogging very bad. I think the torque of a TPI car can put up a good fight through the 1/8th, but the LS1 is such a high rpm car. They like to be wound out. I run mine up to redline before shifting, and it doesn't stop pulling.
Just another perspective.
I've ran a best of 13.0 @ 111 with just a catback, lid, free mods, and drag radails -bogging very bad. I think the torque of a TPI car can put up a good fight through the 1/8th, but the LS1 is such a high rpm car. They like to be wound out. I run mine up to redline before shifting, and it doesn't stop pulling.
Just another perspective.
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Another thing i'll add is a LS1 is a LS1 is a LS1. The SS/WS6/Firehawks aren't any better than the Z28/Formula/Trans Am.
http://www.ls1tech.com can be everyone's friend
http://www.ls1tech.com can be everyone's friend
I dont think all ls1 were created equal. I've beated z28's and they are not as fast as trans ams. There only as fast as formulas. I cant beat ram air trans ams, they can catch me. The SS camaro and ram air ta's are a whole second faster 0-100 than z28's and formulas. They have a good bit more topend. They made the better model for a reason. Motortrend published the article. They state that the ss is 12 flat to 100 and the z28 is 13 flat. Check it in the july 98 issue.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Formula350Scott
I dont think all ls1 were created equal. I've beated z28's and they are not as fast as trans ams. There only as fast as formulas. I cant beat ram air trans ams, they can catch me. The SS camaro and ram air ta's are a whole second faster 0-100 than z28's and formulas. They have a good bit more topend. They made the better model for a reason. Motortrend published the article. They state that the ss is 12 flat to 100 and the z28 is 13 flat. Check it in the july 98 issue.
I dont think all ls1 were created equal. I've beated z28's and they are not as fast as trans ams. There only as fast as formulas. I cant beat ram air trans ams, they can catch me. The SS camaro and ram air ta's are a whole second faster 0-100 than z28's and formulas. They have a good bit more topend. They made the better model for a reason. Motortrend published the article. They state that the ss is 12 flat to 100 and the z28 is 13 flat. Check it in the july 98 issue.
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by Formula350Scott
I dont think all ls1 were created equal. I've beated z28's and they are not as fast as trans ams. There only as fast as formulas. I cant beat ram air trans ams, they can catch me. The SS camaro and ram air ta's are a whole second faster 0-100 than z28's and formulas. They have a good bit more topend. They made the better model for a reason. Motortrend published the article. They state that the ss is 12 flat to 100 and the z28 is 13 flat. Check it in the july 98 issue.
I dont think all ls1 were created equal. I've beated z28's and they are not as fast as trans ams. There only as fast as formulas. I cant beat ram air trans ams, they can catch me. The SS camaro and ram air ta's are a whole second faster 0-100 than z28's and formulas. They have a good bit more topend. They made the better model for a reason. Motortrend published the article. They state that the ss is 12 flat to 100 and the z28 is 13 flat. Check it in the july 98 issue.
EDIT: I'll include what is different...
The SS/WS6/Firehawk gives you...
Hood, wing, wheels, exhaust. The exhaust is hardly anything special, and worth maybe 5hp, which is nothing. The only thing that could remotely help is 275/40 tires compared to a 245/50.
The SS/Firehawk have the RPO WU8. With WU8, you could also add RPO Y2Y which let you add SLP options such as chrome wheels, 1LE or Bilstein suspension, and in 01/02, more exhaust and lid option. The SS/WS6 is 15hp more than a Z28/Formula. They claim that is from the ram air and exhaust. Everyone and their mother knows that ram air thing is a bit over rated.
The Y2Y slp exhaust would add an addition 10hp. That exhaust is the exhaust system you can get from SLP. In 02, you could also add the Blackwing lid with the exhaust (this was standard on the Firehawk, optional on the SS). This brought it up to 345hp. With this Y2Y option, along with the Y2Y BFG g-force tire option, I could see the SS being a tenth or 2 quicker, but more than likely it won't be.
Different drivers, different days, different climates. The SS and WS6 are over rated. That still doesn't mean they don't look sick.

Again, check out http://www.ls1tech.com
Oh, and a full second difference 0-100 between the Z28 and SS? I don't think so.
Last edited by demonspeed; Feb 1, 2004 at 10:50 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by demonspeed
Ignorance is the worst form of stupidity. Trust me, learn a little bit about the cars. There isn't any difference.
Ignorance is the worst form of stupidity. Trust me, learn a little bit about the cars. There isn't any difference.
Ok im wrong. I guess the camaros i raced never got on it but the ta's did. I'll go email motortrend and tell them the numbers they got out of their tests are wrong and that someone on thirdgen.org says theres no difference so we'll take his word on that. There is a difference. The SS was like only 2 tenths faster in the 1/4 but 4 mph better than the z28. Honestly though what does it matter? They are exactly the same when modded cause you would get a better exhaust and stuff anyway. All im saying is that they are faster stock but not by much. Ignorance my ***.
25thmustang: Somebody just said 85' mustang 5.0s had fuel injection and 94 mustangs had 225hp. Better go correct them. HAHA.
25thmustang: Somebody just said 85' mustang 5.0s had fuel injection and 94 mustangs had 225hp. Better go correct them. HAHA.
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
They were exactly the same minus a little better exhaust for the WS6 and SS models. If anything some Z's and TA's are faster because they don't have as many options and tend to weight a bit less. Don't believe anything you read.
They were exactly the same minus a little better exhaust for the WS6 and SS models. If anything some Z's and TA's are faster because they don't have as many options and tend to weight a bit less. Don't believe anything you read.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Formula350Scott
Ok im wrong. I guess the camaros i raced never got on it but the ta's did. I'll go email motortrend and tell them the numbers they got out of their tests are wrong and that someone on thirdgen.org says theres no difference so we'll take his word on that. There is a difference. The SS was like only 2 tenths faster in the 1/4 but 4 mph better than the z28. Honestly though what does it matter? They are exactly the same when modded cause you would get a better exhaust and stuff anyway. All im saying is that they are faster stock but not by much. Ignorance my ***.
25thmustang: Somebody just said 85' mustang 5.0s had fuel injection and 94 mustangs had 225hp. Better go correct them. HAHA.
Ok im wrong. I guess the camaros i raced never got on it but the ta's did. I'll go email motortrend and tell them the numbers they got out of their tests are wrong and that someone on thirdgen.org says theres no difference so we'll take his word on that. There is a difference. The SS was like only 2 tenths faster in the 1/4 but 4 mph better than the z28. Honestly though what does it matter? They are exactly the same when modded cause you would get a better exhaust and stuff anyway. All im saying is that they are faster stock but not by much. Ignorance my ***.
25thmustang: Somebody just said 85' mustang 5.0s had fuel injection and 94 mustangs had 225hp. Better go correct them. HAHA.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
Damn, if ram air ta's are a second faster than regular ta's I really need to get a ram air hood and ws6 exhaust
By the way when I had my car dynoed with the club I'm in it dynoed no better or worse than the comparibly modded ss's and ram air's and as a matter of fact I dynoed 4hp more than a 01 firehawk w/headers. The motors are the same in regular formulas/ta's and z28's/ss's
By the way when I had my car dynoed with the club I'm in it dynoed no better or worse than the comparibly modded ss's and ram air's and as a matter of fact I dynoed 4hp more than a 01 firehawk w/headers. The motors are the same in regular formulas/ta's and z28's/ss's
Originally posted by Dano 00TA
Damn, if ram air ta's are a second faster than regular ta's I really need to get a ram air hood and ws6 exhaust
By the way when I had my car dynoed with the club I'm in it dynoed no better or worse than the comparibly modded ss's and ram air's and as a matter of fact I dynoed 4hp more than a 01 firehawk w/headers. The motors are the same in regular formulas/ta's and z28's/ss's
Damn, if ram air ta's are a second faster than regular ta's I really need to get a ram air hood and ws6 exhaust
By the way when I had my car dynoed with the club I'm in it dynoed no better or worse than the comparibly modded ss's and ram air's and as a matter of fact I dynoed 4hp more than a 01 firehawk w/headers. The motors are the same in regular formulas/ta's and z28's/ss's
25thmustang: Thats good that you help keep the facts straight. I know a lot about mustangs so i know you know what your talking about. How do i more than 31 posts if i dont post? I've just been lurking for years. Also Cobras, z28s and formulas do runs 14's...
at 5300ft above sea level. j/k
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
blah blah blah blah
It's hardly a difference in performance. 9 chances out of ten, the SS and WS6 isn't going to be any quicker than the Z28 or Formula. Of course everyone has a story of some "ringer' that ran in the 12's stock, but for the most part, everyone elses is in the 13's with a high mph.
I'm not even bothering taking mods into consideration. Stock for stock, the difference is going to be neglegable, especially due to conditions and drivers.
It's hardly a difference in performance. 9 chances out of ten, the SS and WS6 isn't going to be any quicker than the Z28 or Formula. Of course everyone has a story of some "ringer' that ran in the 12's stock, but for the most part, everyone elses is in the 13's with a high mph.
I'm not even bothering taking mods into consideration. Stock for stock, the difference is going to be neglegable, especially due to conditions and drivers.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by demonspeed
blah blah blah blah
It's hardly a difference in performance. 9 chances out of ten, the SS and WS6 isn't going to be any quicker than the Z28 or Formula. Of course everyone has a story of some "ringer' that ran in the 12's stock, but for the most part, everyone elses is in the 13's with a high mph.
I'm not even bothering taking mods into consideration. Stock for stock, the difference is going to be neglegable, especially due to conditions and drivers.
blah blah blah blah
It's hardly a difference in performance. 9 chances out of ten, the SS and WS6 isn't going to be any quicker than the Z28 or Formula. Of course everyone has a story of some "ringer' that ran in the 12's stock, but for the most part, everyone elses is in the 13's with a high mph.
I'm not even bothering taking mods into consideration. Stock for stock, the difference is going to be neglegable, especially due to conditions and drivers.
MT and C&D are NOT where you should get your facts from...
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by 25thmustang
Yes 12.8, and they also ran the SS in hot weather, and barely cracked a 13.9 out of the Bullit.
Yes 12.8, and they also ran the SS in hot weather, and barely cracked a 13.9 out of the Bullit.
Originally posted by demonspeed
It might have been 12.89... that's why i'm thinking 12.9. Nonetheless, some people can do it, others can't.
It might have been 12.89... that's why i'm thinking 12.9. Nonetheless, some people can do it, others can't.
Also where should i get my facts from? At least motortrend knows what there doing. A lot of people dont know what there talking about. One guy i knew said he ran 7's in the 1/8 and he had 500 hp in his 98 z28. When he poped the hood it was stock. People lie and thats the truth. At least motortrend has nothing to gian by lying, so they state the facts of their personal tests. Maybe they dont have the best test drivers but the general public cant drive all that well either. Have you ever done an experiment? Sometimes you dont get the same data the second time. Its called % of error. They use a certain percent of error to make sure that there results are acceptable.
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by Formula350Scott
Wheres your 12 second time slip? I would have kept trying til i got one if i were you since you had the mph for it.
Wheres your 12 second time slip? I would have kept trying til i got one if i were you since you had the mph for it.
I'll also add that with 90K miles, my clutch wasn't liking those launches too well.
Because 111mph is enough to do it. I didnt mean anything bad about it, just that he has the power to do it. Shoot, i wish my car ran 13 flat. I'll have some times soon enough but i dont expect them to be good.
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by Formula350Scott
Because 111mph is enough to do it. I didnt mean anything bad about it, just that he has the power to do it. Shoot, i wish my car ran 13 flat. I'll have some times soon enough but i dont expect them to be good.
Because 111mph is enough to do it. I didnt mean anything bad about it, just that he has the power to do it. Shoot, i wish my car ran 13 flat. I'll have some times soon enough but i dont expect them to be good.
All the reason I didn't run 12's was my inexperience with drag radials. I just couldn't pick it up in 4 trys. This spring will be different though
I also remembered that i'm throwing knock sensor codes, and with my car, it retards timing 4 degrees at WOT. Although it's not much, everything added together means (knock, bogging, bad clutch) I can't get my car where it should be. Again, the spring will change things
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by 25thmustang
Yes 12.8, and they also ran the SS in hot weather, and barely cracked a 13.9 out of the Bullit.
Yes 12.8, and they also ran the SS in hot weather, and barely cracked a 13.9 out of the Bullit.
Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords - November 2001, page 133.
Measuring the Competition
It pains us to say this, but a faceful of taillights is what you might get if you race a Camaro SS with a stock Bullitt. Or GT. Or Cobra. We flinched a few years back when we tested a stock LS1 Z/28 and it went 12.89 at 108. But we attributed some of that to the cold, mineshaft air on our test day. No way was this SS going to run 12s in the heat.
Oops. It went 12.96 at 107.43 in lousy air with a near full-tank of fuel, not to mention a 13.06 at 108.71 and a 13.08 at 107.67 later in the hottest part of the day. With any kind of air, the SS might have gone 12.70s or better. On stock radials.
Back at Crazy Horse, it pumped 321 horsepower to the rear wheels on the Dynojet. Are you feeling ill yet? That 42 more than the last Cobra we tested and 82 more than the Bullitt. But gee Uncle Henry, it only has one camshaft.
Pricing? Base Z/28 coupe: $21,645. SS option: $3950. Destination: $575. Total: $26,170. Our's had a few extras like leather and topped out at 29-large.
Now, don't kill the messenger. We're not advocating selling your Mustang to buy a GM product so please don't cancel your subscriptions. This is just to open your eyes and those of the folks at Ford engine development and Team Mustang. We've been waving the Blue Oval banner for decades, fighting the good fight and spending thousands of our hard-earned dollars every year to whip Bowtie butt. But it's time for Ford to send in the reinforcements. We can't do this on our own, guys.
-J.C.
It pains us to say this, but a faceful of taillights is what you might get if you race a Camaro SS with a stock Bullitt. Or GT. Or Cobra. We flinched a few years back when we tested a stock LS1 Z/28 and it went 12.89 at 108. But we attributed some of that to the cold, mineshaft air on our test day. No way was this SS going to run 12s in the heat.
Oops. It went 12.96 at 107.43 in lousy air with a near full-tank of fuel, not to mention a 13.06 at 108.71 and a 13.08 at 107.67 later in the hottest part of the day. With any kind of air, the SS might have gone 12.70s or better. On stock radials.
Back at Crazy Horse, it pumped 321 horsepower to the rear wheels on the Dynojet. Are you feeling ill yet? That 42 more than the last Cobra we tested and 82 more than the Bullitt. But gee Uncle Henry, it only has one camshaft.
Pricing? Base Z/28 coupe: $21,645. SS option: $3950. Destination: $575. Total: $26,170. Our's had a few extras like leather and topped out at 29-large.
Now, don't kill the messenger. We're not advocating selling your Mustang to buy a GM product so please don't cancel your subscriptions. This is just to open your eyes and those of the folks at Ford engine development and Team Mustang. We've been waving the Blue Oval banner for decades, fighting the good fight and spending thousands of our hard-earned dollars every year to whip Bowtie butt. But it's time for Ford to send in the reinforcements. We can't do this on our own, guys.
-J.C.
Last edited by demonspeed; Feb 3, 2004 at 12:16 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Humble, TX
Car: 1999 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
I know the LS1 is a good motor and all, but damn it isn't that good. "OMG LS1 the spirit of Jesus himself resides within it, it cannot lose evar"
Anyway, I don't think any LS1's have won any of those street legal drag championship events. Seems like every thread about an LS1 car, it degenerates into what they do stock and how great they are.
Anyway, I don't think any LS1's have won any of those street legal drag championship events. Seems like every thread about an LS1 car, it degenerates into what they do stock and how great they are.
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by Insaniac198
I know the LS1 is a good motor and all, but damn it isn't that good. "OMG LS1 the spirit of Jesus himself resides within it, it cannot lose evar"
Anyway, I don't think any LS1's have won any of those street legal drag championship events. Seems like every thread about an LS1 car, it degenerates into what they do stock and how great they are.
I know the LS1 is a good motor and all, but damn it isn't that good. "OMG LS1 the spirit of Jesus himself resides within it, it cannot lose evar"
Anyway, I don't think any LS1's have won any of those street legal drag championship events. Seems like every thread about an LS1 car, it degenerates into what they do stock and how great they are.
Bolt on cars with tires will run mid-high 12's.
Full bolt ons and a cam good will yield low 12's.
Heads/cam will have you in the 11's.
Simple stuff. That's just the e/t's. The mph is way higher with a LS1 car compared to a regular small block car. 111 is good enough to run with sbc carb'd guys running 11's. That means on the highway, the LS1 is catching you.
Sure, there are better things out there, but the Gen III engine is the top of the line of the evoluntionary scale. That is until the Gen IV hits in the C6.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Humble, TX
Car: 1999 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by demonspeed
Well, we all know low 13's are the norm for a bone stock car.
Bolt on cars with tires will run mid-high 12's.
Full bolt ons and a cam good will yield low 12's.
Heads/cam will have you in the 11's.
Simple stuff. That's just the e/t's. The mph is way higher with a LS1 car compared to a regular small block car. 111 is good enough to run with sbc carb'd guys running 11's. That means on the highway, the LS1 is catching you.
Sure, there are better things out there, but the Gen III engine is the top of the line of the evoluntionary scale. That is until the Gen IV hits in the C6.
Well, we all know low 13's are the norm for a bone stock car.
Bolt on cars with tires will run mid-high 12's.
Full bolt ons and a cam good will yield low 12's.
Heads/cam will have you in the 11's.
Simple stuff. That's just the e/t's. The mph is way higher with a LS1 car compared to a regular small block car. 111 is good enough to run with sbc carb'd guys running 11's. That means on the highway, the LS1 is catching you.
Sure, there are better things out there, but the Gen III engine is the top of the line of the evoluntionary scale. That is until the Gen IV hits in the C6.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by 5.7Camaroboy
well tons but ill give you the basics 355 speed pro hyperetic pistons 9.7 cam .488 intake .510 exaust edelbrock aluminum head performer rpm aluminum water pump headers bla bla bla b&m shifter lots i was surprised
well tons but ill give you the basics 355 speed pro hyperetic pistons 9.7 cam .488 intake .510 exaust edelbrock aluminum head performer rpm aluminum water pump headers bla bla bla b&m shifter lots i was surprised
Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by Insaniac198
I know. The times you put are accurate I have seen them do it at the track. However, they are not at the top of the street legal drag scene.
I know. The times you put are accurate I have seen them do it at the track. However, they are not at the top of the street legal drag scene.
There are registered and inspected LS1s in the 9's. That's not bad for an engine that's only been available since 1997. My point was that's it's so easy to get power from it. Much more so that anything else.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Humble, TX
Car: 1999 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by Ray87Z
That's a 400ish+ hp setup if it's tuned even remotely right, why were you surprised you beat a 340-350hp car??
That's a 400ish+ hp setup if it's tuned even remotely right, why were you surprised you beat a 340-350hp car??
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Humble, TX
Car: 1999 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by demonspeed
I'll also add that you should know all the fast LS1's anyway. You're right in the heart of the tuners.
I'll also add that you should know all the fast LS1's anyway. You're right in the heart of the tuners.
http://www.motorsporttech.com/customer_rides/index.asp
But still, the best one is a 9.7, which is not anywhere close to winning a street championship.
As far as what is on top:
a lot of the cars that I have seen in the 8s are BBCs
Last edited by Insaniac198; Feb 5, 2004 at 12:00 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
9.7, a guy near me is shooting for 9.7 on Drag Radials in his LS1...
Yes they are awesome motors, and yes they are a SBC. They dont NEED carbs to go fast, and can do it while nailing great driveablility and 25+ mpg...
The fastest are the old dodge motors, in the be all and end all of racing, so in modern days, the LS1 seems to take the top honors...
Yes they are awesome motors, and yes they are a SBC. They dont NEED carbs to go fast, and can do it while nailing great driveablility and 25+ mpg...
The fastest are the old dodge motors, in the be all and end all of racing, so in modern days, the LS1 seems to take the top honors...




