87 camaro vs. '01 m6 ws6
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
87 camaro vs. '01 m6 ws6
my buddy down the road just bought a red 2001 T/A. As far as I know, its stock, save maybe a catback, with a t-56 and the ws6 options.
My mods are in my sig.
i think it'd be a very good, close race. If i lose, I'd have to blame it on the lame 2.73's
what do you guys think?
Brandon
My mods are in my sig.
i think it'd be a very good, close race. If i lose, I'd have to blame it on the lame 2.73's
what do you guys think?
Brandon
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
id say its a drivers race but your 2.73's deffinately hurting you LOL
Those TA's are quick as hell but your car sounds like it has close to the hp that the TA is making. Pretty close race it sounds like. LOL
Those TA's are quick as hell but your car sounds like it has close to the hp that the TA is making. Pretty close race it sounds like. LOL
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
He will win. His car is putting almost as much to the wheels as yours is at the crank. You should fare well however, but as the speed increases you will probably see tailights. Now if he can't drive, that is another story.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
so how about the same race, but me w/ 3.42's or possibly 3.73's?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Tobias05
so how about the same race, but me w/ 3.42's or possibly 3.73's?
so how about the same race, but me w/ 3.42's or possibly 3.73's?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
GM 330hp crate was not dynoed with RPM intake so you might gain some more power with that. I'd say your atleast close to 350hp so this race should be close as the LS1 has about 350fwhp. Your exhaust is real free flowing it looks like, so yeah, expect some power increases over 330 crate, unless it was dynoed with straight headers then, you will lose some hp.
Trending Topics
There are a few members here in the 12's with that motor so don't count yourself out. If he just got the car he probably can't launch it which means he wont be anywhere near the potential of the car so I'm gonna say you win.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
it doesnt it has about 350 FWHP, flywheel hp or about that cuz practically same as vette motor which had 345ish.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by stu
Since when did the LS1 have 350hp to the wheels?
Since when did the LS1 have 350hp to the wheels?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally posted by 25THRSS
There are a few members here in the 12's with that motor so don't count yourself out. If he just got the car he probably can't launch it which means he wont be anywhere near the potential of the car so I'm gonna say you win.
There are a few members here in the 12's with that motor so don't count yourself out. If he just got the car he probably can't launch it which means he wont be anywhere near the potential of the car so I'm gonna say you win.
He just got the car so he can't drive, and i just got a new engine so I'm out too
...ehh seriously, i'd give him a small driving advantage though.
Seeing its my DD, I spent too much money to break it right away!
haha,
Brandon
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Stu is a GM performance 350 HO motor. Aftermarket motor swap.. Rated at 330hp. with better intake, it may be 350hp+
LS1 is 350 hp but rated at 320hp.
A 350hp car will run with a 350hp car. its same power. Now gearing and wieght takes over to determine the winner. thirdgen is lighter so it will be close. Just your gears and LACK of converter will cause you to lose.
I dont see why its hard to understand this.
LS1 is 350 hp but rated at 320hp.
A 350hp car will run with a 350hp car. its same power. Now gearing and wieght takes over to determine the winner. thirdgen is lighter so it will be close. Just your gears and LACK of converter will cause you to lose.
I dont see why its hard to understand this.
Originally posted by stu
So it's not just a regular Chevy 350? It's some rare high output motor?
Would those mods make much of a noticable difference on say a 90 IROC Z?
So it's not just a regular Chevy 350? It's some rare high output motor?
Would those mods make much of a noticable difference on say a 90 IROC Z?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Its a crate motor that you buy from parts dealers. Many are made and its a cheap performance motor. Great deal for budget performance seekers. Not rare at all LOL
The HO 350 crate rated at 330 has better vortec heads which flow better than the L98 heads on the 350's in the Irocz/GTA/formula birds and the vettes. Also the 330 HO is carb motor, not fuel injection. That RPM intake he has got will out flow most fuel injection setups so it will make more power
It is an aftermarket motor, that you buy and then put into your car LOL. No car came stock with high performance motor like that. All camaro L98's are virtually the same except for different cam in the 91-92's and speed density as opposed to mass air flow. Same goes with the corvettes.
The HO 350 crate rated at 330 has better vortec heads which flow better than the L98 heads on the 350's in the Irocz/GTA/formula birds and the vettes. Also the 330 HO is carb motor, not fuel injection. That RPM intake he has got will out flow most fuel injection setups so it will make more power
It is an aftermarket motor, that you buy and then put into your car LOL. No car came stock with high performance motor like that. All camaro L98's are virtually the same except for different cam in the 91-92's and speed density as opposed to mass air flow. Same goes with the corvettes.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
so whats the weight difference between us?
2, 3 hundred pounds?
EDIT: to add on, IIRC doesn't adding/shaving 100 pounds equal +/- 1/10th in the 1/4th?
2, 3 hundred pounds?
EDIT: to add on, IIRC doesn't adding/shaving 100 pounds equal +/- 1/10th in the 1/4th?
Last edited by Tobias05; Oct 20, 2004 at 08:03 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Car: 1984 Camaro z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
my 84 Camaro with a 350 carbed weighs in at almost 3500 on the dot with me in it depending on how much gas is in the car. Ive done no weight reduction and as far as i know neither have the previous owners. I way about 160 btw
I think LS1s weigh about 3500 or so without a driver (could be wrong) a driver so figure your gonna be at least 150 LBs lighter
Yea as a general rule 100 lbs will add or subtract about a one tenth from your 1/4
I think LS1s weigh about 3500 or so without a driver (could be wrong) a driver so figure your gonna be at least 150 LBs lighter
Yea as a general rule 100 lbs will add or subtract about a one tenth from your 1/4
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport,tn
Car: 1991 camaro RS
Engine: 305 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
His car is putting almost as much to the wheels as yours is at the crank
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by stu
So it's not just a regular Chevy 350? It's some rare high output motor?
So it's not just a regular Chevy 350? It's some rare high output motor?
Originally posted by del91_305
the WS6 was rated out of the factory at i think 325HP. So are you saying that that is at the wheels? IF so is the LT1 the same? I have a buddy with an LT1 T/A M6, i drove it several times and that thing has soo much power its rediculous.
the WS6 was rated out of the factory at i think 325HP. So are you saying that that is at the wheels? IF so is the LT1 the same? I have a buddy with an LT1 T/A M6, i drove it several times and that thing has soo much power its rediculous.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
GM rates everything at the crank with accesories and all. They under-rate the cars for various reasons.
Insurance
Can't have the same ratings with the corvette
M6 LT1 cars should put down 260 at the wheels
M6 LS1 cars should put down 300
Insurance
Can't have the same ratings with the corvette
M6 LT1 cars should put down 260 at the wheels
M6 LS1 cars should put down 300
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i dont know about those stats. 300hp at wheels is about the freak ls1's i have seen. Most are mid 280's or low 290's at wheels. Assuming 15% loss, 300 at wheels is 352 on motor, its close, but sure the stock air intake is holding it back to 290 at wheels. Thats why lids are great hp makers on those cars!!
LT1 vettes were 300hp so Fbodys are 275. 285 for the SS
again, 260 at wheels is around 305 on motor, so its close as well to the vette, but vette got better breathing so rating for fbody motors is little lower. Fbodys are more like 250 at wheels. Even tho same engine.
LT1 vettes were 300hp so Fbodys are 275. 285 for the SS
again, 260 at wheels is around 305 on motor, so its close as well to the vette, but vette got better breathing so rating for fbody motors is little lower. Fbodys are more like 250 at wheels. Even tho same engine.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
thats just there awesome potential! Just full catback and a CAI lid and your running high 12's consistently with a decent driver!
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
thats just there awesome potential! Just full catback and a CAI lid and your running high 12's consistently with a decent driver!
thats just there awesome potential! Just full catback and a CAI lid and your running high 12's consistently with a decent driver!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
i dont know about those stats. 300hp at wheels is about the freak ls1's i have seen. Most are mid 280's or low 290's at wheels.
i dont know about those stats. 300hp at wheels is about the freak ls1's i have seen. Most are mid 280's or low 290's at wheels.
My car put down 307rwhp with only a cutout when it was new and I don't consider it a freak.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Gary, Indiana
Car: 00 Trans Am/89 IROC
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: 4L60/700R4
Originally posted by nick418
i think the LS1 will win, remember the Ls1 is unbeatable
i think the LS1 will win, remember the Ls1 is unbeatable
Exactly
By the way I think the LS1 will win unless the driver loses it himself.
Although it should be close.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally posted by Dano 00TA
Although it should be close.
Although it should be close.
That's what they're for right?
thanks for your comments,
Brandon
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally posted by Dano 00TA
You do need to pitch those 2.73's though
Those are gonna hurt your chances imho.
Good Luck!!!
You do need to pitch those 2.73's though
Those are gonna hurt your chances imho.
Good Luck!!!
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
Stu, you should definitely get an LT1 motor and i'm sorry to hear that your b18a blew. What happened anyway? Too much boost or fried piston rings? Good luck either way getting a new motor.
As for the LS1 vs. GMHO 350, its a drivers race now. A nice stall and steeper gears should give you the win.
~Matt
As for the LS1 vs. GMHO 350, its a drivers race now. A nice stall and steeper gears should give you the win.
~Matt
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
http://www.sdpc2000.com/catalog/120/...e-Assembly.htm
the cam aint bad, 212/222, but for that RPM intake, i think it should have alittle more duration and little more lift. around a hot cam type would be nice with around 500" of lift to match the flow potential of the vortec heads. The LS1 cam is nothing special either, low 200's duration. A 220/220 cam in an LS1 is perfect and makes HUGE power increases.
I think that the power is capable to take an LS1 but if the driver can drive real good, then the HO350 has its work cut out for it. LS1's are better running motors and have great power band, but that 350HO makes 380lb feet torque so it has some grunt, more than LS1 so if you can harness that on launch, combined with lighter wieght of thirdgen, it will be a good race.
the cam aint bad, 212/222, but for that RPM intake, i think it should have alittle more duration and little more lift. around a hot cam type would be nice with around 500" of lift to match the flow potential of the vortec heads. The LS1 cam is nothing special either, low 200's duration. A 220/220 cam in an LS1 is perfect and makes HUGE power increases.
I think that the power is capable to take an LS1 but if the driver can drive real good, then the HO350 has its work cut out for it. LS1's are better running motors and have great power band, but that 350HO makes 380lb feet torque so it has some grunt, more than LS1 so if you can harness that on launch, combined with lighter wieght of thirdgen, it will be a good race.
Last edited by Orr89RocZ; Oct 22, 2004 at 11:44 AM.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by akbar347
Am I the only one here who thinks a GMHO 350 doesn't have nearly enough cam to take on an LS1?
Am I the only one here who thinks a GMHO 350 doesn't have nearly enough cam to take on an LS1?
Dono 00TA put 307 at the wheels with an A4 car. An M6 car with a cut-out would have put about 10 more down.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Some people are underestimating the 350HO in my opinion. CarCraft tested a nearly identical setup to the one we're dicussing, the 330hp HO "Deluxe" version with a RPM intake added, a 750 holley, and longtube headers and made around 370 hp unless I'm mistaken (looked it up, 370hp, 408 ft-lbs. It had made 348hp with just the headers BTW). That's well tuned and such though, so leave some room for some lost HP in the real world but the 350 HO definitely has a shot in this case. I think the gearing may be the downfall though, the M6 LS1 will have 3.42s... Do you have decently wide tires and a limited slip diff? If not you'll get your *** reamed trying to launch a 2.73 peg leg on crappy stock wheels/tires...
I don't have a much bigger cam than the HO in my Vortec headed motor (I have the XE262, 218/224 @.050) and I've taken out a couple LS1s, so... Course I do have 3.42s...
I don't have a much bigger cam than the HO in my Vortec headed motor (I have the XE262, 218/224 @.050) and I've taken out a couple LS1s, so... Course I do have 3.42s...
Last edited by Ray87Z; Oct 23, 2004 at 03:34 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally posted by Ray87Z
...you'll get your *** reamed trying to launch a 2.73 peg leg on crappy stock wheels/tires...
...you'll get your *** reamed trying to launch a 2.73 peg leg on crappy stock wheels/tires...







