Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

LG4 vs 2000 Accord V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #1  
Nate86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
LG4 vs 2000 Accord V6

One of my coworkers has a 2000 Accord with a V6/A4 which is completely stock. We've raced before, and he definately had the faster car before I put the headers on. I challenged him again to see if maybe the headers evened things out between the two cars. The results were pretty interesting.

We raced four times: two from a dig and two from a 35 mph roll.

The first race I was destroyed because I wasn't paying attention at all to my friend who did a countdown for us. I was expecting him to say "Go" after counting down from three, but the other guy left on three and it was nothing but a catch up game from there.

Race two turned out a lot better. Instead of having a "confusing" countdown, I just honked my horn three times. I immediately got the jump on him and put about 1½ cars on him until about 70 mph when we shut down.

Race three and four had pretty much the same thing happen both times. We hit it at 35 mph, and stayed pretty much dead even until about 65-70 mph when he slowly started to pull away. It was kind of disappointing to see that his car still has more top end power than mine, even with the addition of headers to my engine. However, it does give me inspiration to starting adding more hot parts to get it running faster still. I know what my next mod will be (it's got a 262 in the name, if you want to try to guess what it is ).

Anyway, although my story may not be that interesting, I hope any fellow LG4 tuners will see this and not make the mistake of overestimating how much power one simple mod might add, like I did. We both had the idea set that I was going to murder his car until we actually went out and raced. The results surprised both of us. Haha... I guess I learned another valuable lesson which would be bench racing is only good for **** talking.

EDIT: Spelling and grammar corrections
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,764
Likes: 562
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Cars have come a long way in the past 20 years so I wouldn;t be too ashamed. You still have a great platform to work from. I once got beat by a V6 malibu when my LO3 was stock.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #3  
Screamin86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: Verona Va
Car: 86 Trans Am,03 Yukon,92 Z28
Engine: 5.3, 5.3, lb9
Transmission: th350,4l60e,700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73,3.73,2.73
when i had the stock lg4 w/ 218,xxx miles in my car i raced a buddy of mines moms 02 accord 4 door 4 banger w/ 5spd and it was fairly even un less he did his imfamous launch technique (stall and miss 2nd) then i would kill him. but i had surprising top end. we raced on interstate and we both got on it at about 75 and i kept goin and let off at about 120-125 and he claims he was catching me but the girl riding w/ him said they were doin 105 when he shutdown. he will be in for a big surprise once my new motor is in
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #4  
Nate86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
That's cool dude. The V6 is a whole different beast, though. 200 HP/TQ vs the I4's 150 HP/TQ.

What's going in your TA now?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 09:15 PM
  #5  
Screamin86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: Verona Va
Car: 86 Trans Am,03 Yukon,92 Z28
Engine: 5.3, 5.3, lb9
Transmission: th350,4l60e,700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73,3.73,2.73
i bought ho 305 from 84 ta runing w 120,xxxmiles and i tore it down bored it .030 over bigger cam better ignition headers the words estimated 300hp. and ive got 383 in the works too. but the 310 matches the color of my car also i hope it will run pretty strong
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #6  
Nate86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Cool, I hope to somewhere around 250 WHP once I finish up the 305, then moving on to bigger and better things.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 03:58 AM
  #7  
TBI92Camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
You guys building your 305's....could have just spent the money on a 350+ cubed motor and be odne with it. Ive been there, odne that with 305's and found they are only useful as paperweights.....Ill never waste my time on one again......theres a few members here who have had luck but all in all, for real performance, 305's are worthless hunks of scrap metal

BTW, good races!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 06:14 AM
  #8  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LG4 vs 2000 Accord V6

Originally posted by Nate86.It was kind of disappointing to see that his car still has more top end power than mine, even with the addition of headers to my engine.

I hope any fellow LG4 tuners will see this and not make the mistake of overestimating how much power one simple mod might add, like I did.
Are you running the stock LG4 cam? If so, it shouldn't be disappointing... as headers will only take you so far with the stock LG4 valve-train....

Consider a better cam, intake... while port matching everything. Program (or have someone program) the stock LG4's ECM to constantly stay in open loop so you can maintain you're electronic spark control, then swap to a demon carb.

You'll be disappointed, no more....
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #9  
Wind Charger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Car: 1988 GTA TRANS AM, 1986 TRANS AM
Engine: L98, 5.7 TPI reborn, comp cam/heads maybe HSR this spring 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by TBI92Camaro
You guys building your 305's....could have just spent the money on a 350+ cubed motor and be odne with it. Ive been there, odne that with 305's and found they are only useful as paperweights.....Ill never waste my time on one again......theres a few members here who have had luck but all in all, for real performance, 305's are worthless hunks of scrap metal

BTW, good races!

305's are fun to drive and they get better milage than the 350's at least the TPI. But look elsewhere if you want more performance.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #10  
Nate86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally posted by TBI92Camaro
You guys building your 305's....could have just spent the money on a 350+ cubed motor and be odne with it. Ive been there, odne that with 305's and found they are only useful as paperweights.....Ill never waste my time on one again......theres a few members here who have had luck but all in all, for real performance, 305's are worthless hunks of scrap metal

BTW, good races!
Just thought I'd add that even if I had a 350, I would still have to buy all the other things to go with it as well, such as headers, intake, cam, heads, ect. A 350 with an LG4 valvetrain is going to be just about as slow as the LG4 itself.

By the way, the only real mod I have done so far is the addition of headers.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #11  
Screamin86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: Verona Va
Car: 86 Trans Am,03 Yukon,92 Z28
Engine: 5.3, 5.3, lb9
Transmission: th350,4l60e,700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73,3.73,2.73
i just put together a 305 so i could get the car running again. and i do have a 350 4-bolt main too also got it for $35!!! but im going to replace everything in it crank,rods,pistons cam u name it it will be new and better. the 305 is fairly reliable than what ppl say about it i ean mine went to 218,xxx miles till the oil pump went bad and reaked havoc on the motors internals.once i get mine back together though just for giggles im gona get a buddie of mine to drive my honda and i wanna race it and i have a few buddies w/ built trucks that wanna run me
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 12:52 PM
  #12  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by Wind Charger
305's are fun to drive and they get better milage than the 350's at least the TPI. But look elsewhere if you want more performance.
Just wanted to say its all in the tune. With my 305 and 2.73s with an SLP cat-back, high flow cat, and SLP 1 3/4" headers and CAI, I got some 28mpg on the highway one trip.

With the 350 that I rebuilt, I expected nothing less on the highway. I'm sure I could get that kind of mileage, even with my 3.23s and bigger cam. Higher compression helps a bit, and the tune makes a big difference. I had gotten 19mpg on a highway trip with a few long WOT top-the-car-out runs and sitting in traffic for quite a while because of a jack-knived semi. I also didn't have highway spark or fuel modes, DFCO or a torque convert clutch lockup. The combination of the tune and the trans alone I expect would have given me at least another 25% highway mode.

I probably won't ever find out though as I'm pretty sure the bird will be replaced by a '98 Z28 M6 tomorrow ... ...

Last edited by DuronClocker; Nov 2, 2005 at 12:56 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #13  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
If you're going with the XE262 cam, don't forget to buy a better intake. The stock intake will hold back the cam a lot. Trust me....
(sig)
~Matt
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #14  
Screamin86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: Verona Va
Car: 86 Trans Am,03 Yukon,92 Z28
Engine: 5.3, 5.3, lb9
Transmission: th350,4l60e,700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73,3.73,2.73
yea not sure on what cam i want yet i know i want something that will rev high but still be streetable and as soon after breakin a new intake is being put on i was looking at a weiand intake that worked w/ power ranges from idle to 7k i hope to be able to take out a few ricers aroud here with this though 3.73 will be swaped in too
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #15  
Petes 84Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 3
From: out of my mind; be back in 5 minutes....
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Completed
Axle/Gears: ones that turn.
I've just got a small cam in my 84 LG4; it has .420" lift on both intake and exhaust. Don't have any other specs as it was pulled from a blown-up 400 from a motorhome (would this make it an 'RV' cam )
225k miles on the engine; heads have never been off the block. Hedman shorties and y-pipe into a Dynomax 2 ¾" cat-back.
Stock, cast-iron intake with a somewhat tuned (using only parts I had on hand - probably not optimal) Q-jet.
T-5 and a 3.42 open rear on street tires netted me 2.32 second 60-foot times on my way to 14.494 seconds and 98.69 mph in the quarter in my old 83 SC.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #16  
Nate86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally posted by anymethod
If you're going with the XE262 cam, don't forget to buy a better intake. The stock intake will hold back the cam a lot. Trust me....
(sig)
~Matt
ZZ4 intake in my room waiting to go on.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 10:37 PM
  #17  
Screamin86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: Verona Va
Car: 86 Trans Am,03 Yukon,92 Z28
Engine: 5.3, 5.3, lb9
Transmission: th350,4l60e,700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73,3.73,2.73
both of my intakes i have a stock aluminum intakes one im using for now has been media blasted so look aftermarket until i get nice one that will work better w/ my setup
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #18  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,430
Likes: 500
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by TBI92Camaro
You guys building your 305's....could have just spent the money on a 350+ cubed motor and be odne with it. Ive been there, odne that with 305's and found they are only useful as paperweights.....Ill never waste my time on one again......theres a few members here who have had luck but all in all, for real performance, 305's are worthless hunks of scrap metal

BTW, good races!
My 305 and a TBI at that ran a 9.89 @ 69.08 in the 1/8 pulling a 5,300 lbs G-Van.

You guys racing Honda's better hope that you never run across the old 2 door Acura Legends with the 6spd. They are lighter than an F-body, have 240 HP/200 ft/lbs and have a very low gear (like 4.40:1), and a 6,300 RPM redline. They are quick, my mom has one. 14.2s bone stock with some stickier tires on it.

Last edited by Fast355; Nov 4, 2005 at 08:58 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
anymethod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
Pete:

Your "old 83 SC" has something important to it that my Trans Am doesn't though. You have a matched drivetrain. My 2.73 rear and stock stall kill the gains from the cam. Since you have 3.42s and a T-5 you don't have that problem. I hope my car will run those times with a new rear gear and stall.

~Matt
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #20  
80smetalfan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by Fast355
You guys racing Honda's better hope that you never run across the old 2 door Acura Legends with the 6spd. They are lighter than an F-body, have 240 HP/200 ft/lbs and have a very low gear (like 4.40:1), and a 6,300 RPM redline. They are quick, my mom has one. 14.2s bone stock with some stickier tires on it.
Really? This makes sense then. My brother was telling me that he test drove a Legend and it felt as fast as his 71 Chevelle was with a stock 350, and I figured he was just full of it. Those come with inline 5s, right?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #21  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
No, that was the Acura Vigor.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #22  
80smetalfan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by stu
No, that was the Acura Vigor.
Hmmm.....do these Legends have the V6 then?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 03:59 AM
  #23  
stu's Avatar
stu
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Why yes they do fine sir.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fireslash
Camaros for Sale
3
Apr 11, 2016 06:43 PM
kammi10
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Nov 9, 2015 08:28 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM
Eric-86sc
Interior Parts for Sale
1
Sep 28, 2015 11:37 AM
challenger71
Interior Parts for Sale
0
Sep 10, 2015 04:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM.