MAF or Speed Density
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: lt1 intaked 355 makin 277 on 25 psi of fuel pressure and stock timing :)
Transmission: A4 stock... that moved a mobile dyno a foot shifting into 2nd :)
MAF or Speed Density
which do you like better... i have an 86 with maf but am gonna buy an 88 with SD and i wanna know whats the difference when i start to mod the car... its a 5 speed and has 3.45 gears so just wondering which is better?
Re: MAF or Speed Density
Originally posted by 86IROCTHD
which do you like better... i have an 86 with maf but am gonna buy an 88 with SD and i wanna know whats the difference when i start to mod the car... its a 5 speed and has 3.45 gears so just wondering which is better?
which do you like better... i have an 86 with maf but am gonna buy an 88 with SD and i wanna know whats the difference when i start to mod the car... its a 5 speed and has 3.45 gears so just wondering which is better?
just fyi
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: lt1 intaked 355 makin 277 on 25 psi of fuel pressure and stock timing :)
Transmission: A4 stock... that moved a mobile dyno a foot shifting into 2nd :)
thanks
yea i was just reading up and i heard 90 is when they went to sd so.... went to go see the car and the motor is out and sitting in his driveway..... so i really couldnt tell... but he only wants 1300 for it... nice clean straight body and wheels were recently redone looks like new
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
I like having speed density. Don't have to worry about the MAF failling, or being a restriction, and makes it easier to do stuff like this (don't have to incorporate the MAF into the system):

I just think speed density is better and simpler.

I just think speed density is better and simpler.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
By the way, regardless of whether it's SD or MAF, for $1300 for a nice condition, 5-speed '88, I'd go for it. I don't look at SD or MAF as a selling point. 
What engine?

What engine?
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Re: Re: MAF or Speed Density
Originally posted by tjrh522
88 was still a MAF car unless owner converted it over...89 went to SD...better double check before you buy...
just fyi
88 was still a MAF car unless owner converted it over...89 went to SD...better double check before you buy...
just fyi
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
My car came with MAF and I converted it to SD. MAF is less sensitive to modifications. So you can do more to your engine and run a stock chip. SD is more sensitive to engine modifications. SD is easier to tune in my opinion, but you have to know how to burn proms. Overall I like speed density more then MAF. I was able to get my car to run better with SD then it ever did with MAF. But this was with prom burning.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: lt1 intaked 355 makin 277 on 25 psi of fuel pressure and stock timing :)
Transmission: A4 stock... that moved a mobile dyno a foot shifting into 2nd :)
the motor was the LB9 which is what i had in my 86 but the 88 is a roller... motor through 4 rods and so its trash but the heads up should still be good... had the G92 rear option and by lookin at the tech data base its a 3.45 9 bolt posi disk rear...
i already have a 9 bolt in my 86 but its a 3.08 and its an auto... the seats are gonna need to be replace but i am gonna put 4th gens in it and mabye a roll cage.... so i should have some fun......
thanks guys
i already have a 9 bolt in my 86 but its a 3.08 and its an auto... the seats are gonna need to be replace but i am gonna put 4th gens in it and mabye a roll cage.... so i should have some fun......
thanks guys Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,097
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
iroc,
Are we talking about runing in part throttle conditions or wot??
I'm having problems in part throttle with MAF.. But under WOT it doesn't matter cuz I run a 8:1 FMU w/ boost.
I'm thinking of the speed density swap over the winter.. I'm thinking if I could get idle/part throttle tuning down pat, WOT stuff shouldn't matter cuz of the FMU.. Plus, I'd like to get rid of the maf, and maybe run my supercharger intake to a cowl hood.
-- Joe
Are we talking about runing in part throttle conditions or wot??
I'm having problems in part throttle with MAF.. But under WOT it doesn't matter cuz I run a 8:1 FMU w/ boost.
I'm thinking of the speed density swap over the winter.. I'm thinking if I could get idle/part throttle tuning down pat, WOT stuff shouldn't matter cuz of the FMU.. Plus, I'd like to get rid of the maf, and maybe run my supercharger intake to a cowl hood.
-- Joe
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Originally posted by anesthes
iroc,
Are we talking about runing in part throttle conditions or wot??
I'm having problems in part throttle with MAF.. But under WOT it doesn't matter cuz I run a 8:1 FMU w/ boost.
I'm thinking of the speed density swap over the winter.. I'm thinking if I could get idle/part throttle tuning down pat, WOT stuff shouldn't matter cuz of the FMU.. Plus, I'd like to get rid of the maf, and maybe run my supercharger intake to a cowl hood.
-- Joe
iroc,
Are we talking about runing in part throttle conditions or wot??
I'm having problems in part throttle with MAF.. But under WOT it doesn't matter cuz I run a 8:1 FMU w/ boost.
I'm thinking of the speed density swap over the winter.. I'm thinking if I could get idle/part throttle tuning down pat, WOT stuff shouldn't matter cuz of the FMU.. Plus, I'd like to get rid of the maf, and maybe run my supercharger intake to a cowl hood.
-- Joe
Originally posted by 89 Iroc Z
My car came with MAF and I converted it to SD. MAF is less sensitive to modifications. So you can do more to your engine and run a stock chip. SD is more sensitive to engine modifications. SD is easier to tune in my opinion, but you have to know how to burn proms. Overall I like speed density more then MAF. I was able to get my car to run better with SD then it ever did with MAF. But this was with prom burning.
My car came with MAF and I converted it to SD. MAF is less sensitive to modifications. So you can do more to your engine and run a stock chip. SD is more sensitive to engine modifications. SD is easier to tune in my opinion, but you have to know how to burn proms. Overall I like speed density more then MAF. I was able to get my car to run better with SD then it ever did with MAF. But this was with prom burning.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
Feb 26, 2016 02:57 PM
MikkoV
TPI
2
Sep 9, 2015 04:25 PM






