TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IROC Shootout on History Channel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
burnout88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 17
From: Somewhere
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
IROC Shootout on History Channel

Did anyone watch the History Channel IROC shootout tonight? I thought it was pretty cool. Two 88 IROC 350 TPI cars both got blowers, and exhaust. Best E.T was 13.2 on otherwise stock cars. I am sure they would have went into the twelve's with a few more tricks and better driving.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is posted on almost every board. lol

Not surprised at the ET's. I ran a 13.85@103.8 on my 305 first time out with essentially the same mods. They could easily put those cars in the 12's, I'm going to be there soon myself. New in the box though, its not a cheap route... 3k+
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 10:23 PM
  #3  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
I watched it, it was a pretty good show but kind of funny watching those people that never worked on our type of cars fondle everything like "whats this?" lol i think the show converted some import kids into domestic drivers. only reason the white car ran better was the 65lb kid driving it LOL
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 11:08 PM
  #4  
mike graycar's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Car: 88 iroc x 2- 1 T-Top, 1 Vert
Engine: 350 tpi, 305 tpi
Transmission: 700R4-2800 stall, 700R4 stock
only reason the white car ran better was the 65lb kid driving it LOL

Too true, I thought it was because the white one was a hardtop !
I was impressed with the amount of power they made when they baselined them. I would be interested to find out where they got them, how much they paid and how many miles are on those two cars.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #5  
1992rs/ss's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 2
From: Munster IN
Car: 92 RS, 05 GTO (sold), 10 TL AWD
Engine: 383 HSR w/DSC1
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Strange S60/3.73
something tells me vortec will sell a few more superchargers this month I was really impressed that they got over 200 hp at the rear wheels. I think the red car lost because thay were trying to manually shift the 700r4 without a shift kit. I have always found the 700r4 was slower between shifts when you did that in stock form. plus the t-tops weren't helping them plant off the line either. kind of ticked me off when the kids were like "we might keep 'em" granted I am only 22 but still, those cars are just so sweet looking with the IROC wheels. I really liked the red one for looks out of the two, but you can prob. guess I like red
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 12:34 AM
  #6  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
The Dyno told the whole story, the red car was probably beaten more or had more miles on it. thats why it dyno'ed i think 11hp less(207-196?) but yeah the old men didnt know how to shift it, i would have left it in D as well but i never driven a 700r4 before but see how they had that oil leak, they "inspected" the oil filter ring when obviously when they changed the oil the didnt bother looking at the rubber stuck to the block still and they screwed the new oil filter on and then it sprayed oil out! duh grooves in the oil filter, what a dumb cover up!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #7  
anondude13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
I missed it
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #8  
88305tpiT/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 2
From: Ft Worth, TX USA
Car: 2016 Ram 1500
Engine: 3.0L Diesel
Transmission: 8sp
I loved the cars on that show but that was about it. The people and especially the host brothers are complete tools. OMG if anyone listens to these guys to learn about how cars work their brains will explode. I almost had to put it on mute so I could just watch the cars and not have to listen to the CR@P coming out of those two's mouths.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #9  
Paul Riccioli Jr's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 1
From: Bound Brook, NJ USA
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Ok let me make this TPI related a little. Did anyone see the comparison they did between the stock ignition and the MSD ignition systems? I thought the stock HEI was supposed to be pretty good and we didnt' really need MSD boxes? You could clearly see the difference in the two setups in their demonstration. Do you think it was staged that way?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:32 AM
  #10  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hype.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #11  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
I did notice the red box around the "test" area. It screams product promo from MSD. I think it’s true, but exaggerated.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #12  
mike graycar's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Car: 88 iroc x 2- 1 T-Top, 1 Vert
Engine: 350 tpi, 305 tpi
Transmission: 700R4-2800 stall, 700R4 stock
I'm sure thinking about a MSD box........
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #13  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have any misfire? No? Dont waste your cash.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #14  
KiLLJ0Y
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm sure thinking about a MSD box........


yeah the MSD is awesome....
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #15  
tommygun's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Holly, New Jersey
Car: 1992 Firebird Formula 350
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
It would've been a better challenge to race with only N/A tuning. A good set of heads, cam and exhaust should be able to get mid 13's. Kinda expected more with superchargers.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #16  
Bill Speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1989 Formy droptop/88 Deville
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: factory RWD, WS6 susp
MSD seems a fairly common mod, but how about Paxton superchargers for the TPI? Check out the blown 92 Z28 Cam in the convertible section here, though not stock anymore, that's the king out of any seen on TV lately!!
Bill

Last edited by Bill Speed; Jan 6, 2005 at 03:16 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #17  
CC's Avatar
CC
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 138
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 1989 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI - Stock
Transmission: 700R4
I thought it was a great show! If the contenders knew free little tricks ie: Throttle Body Coolant Bypass, Mass Airflow descreened, removing front sway bars, or Torque Converter Lockup Switch, would have helped their timeslip/ET. It's very rare to have an IROC-Z28 showout especially on the History Channel. The show took me back to 1988; high school days, no responsibilities, no rents/mortgages, etc. I'm glad I recorded it on my old VCR. Now I need to have a 5.7TPI IROC-Z28.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #18  
Nikon02's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: omaha ne
Car: 86 iroc
Engine: crappy 350 crate i am building up
Transmission: 700r4
i had to work so i missed it. i was woundering if anyone got it on video for the computer so it could be posted maybe?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 09:53 PM
  #19  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Those two twins wouldn't know performance if it ran them the **** over, backed up onto their heads and did a stand through the first three on what was left.

That show sucked. From either a History standpoint or a performance standpoint. Equal cars? What was the gearing? And convenient that MSD provided them with a sales prop. I was shaking my head through almost the whole thing. Sure did help me decide that I won't be watching that show anymore. Maybe Alton Brown is on brewing some beer....
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:17 PM
  #20  
OneBadZ4U's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, MD
Car: '86 Iroc, '87 Iroc Vert
Engine: 350 TPI, 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 in both
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.45 both LSD's
Red Devil, lighten up a little. I agree that the show was a little weak for us true enthusiasts, but I think that it defanitly opened up the eyes of everybody who watched it. I mean, did you see how tight those cars looked. There has been no better designed car in the last 20 years!!! The IROC's are the last hot rod. And now people are aware. Maybe their power was weak compared to today, but their looks were and are right in line with 1st gen models. I think the show was a great example of what you can do with a IROC. Maybe a little weak, but still how many other show's have done something with the ROC??
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:38 PM
  #21  
89Warbird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 1989 GTA Nighthawk
Engine: 389 CID TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.23
I liked the show. It could have been better, but it's not made for hard core gearheads. It definitely will get some people looking at Third Gens again.

I'm thinking the red car lost because of trying to shift it manually and probably had a weak transmission that was slipping.

If you think your stock HEI can compare to an aftermarket ignition, dream on. And if you think you don't need a better ignition if you don't have any mis-fires,

Good show, enjoyed it. I think that the white IROC pulled down the best E.T. of ANY cars they've built on Full Throttle.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #22  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Umm... no. If I relaxed anymore I'd be asleep.

"...no better designed car in the last 20 years..."

Umm... no.

And what was their best, 13.2? On boost? There are guys on this board that can go quicker with bolt ons on the stock shortblock n/a. No, that show sucked, the twins graduated from McDonalds Parking Lot Monkey-Spank University. Hell, even the watered down Rides goes more in depth. :shrug:
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #23  
White91GTA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 1991 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
I missed it too
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:50 PM
  #24  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
Originally posted by Red Devil
Umm... no. If I relaxed anymore I'd be asleep.

"...no better designed car in the last 20 years..."

Umm... no.

And what was their best, 13.2? On boost? There are guys on this board that can go quicker with bolt ons on the stock shortblock n/a. No, that show sucked, the twins graduated from McDonalds Parking Lot Monkey-Spank University. Hell, even the watered down Rides goes more in depth. :shrug:
Id say 13.2 isnt bad at all for a bolted on supercharger and exhaust say they ran 14.8's stock thats over a second and a half with 2 mods and could easily be tuned into the 12's, one thing that would help greatly would be.......a TORQUE CONVETER! things sounded like a dog off the line, i think a 2500+ stall would get them into the 12's pretty good. but thats my
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2005 | 10:59 PM
  #25  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by 89Warbird
I liked the show. It could have been better, but it's not made for hard core gearheads. It definitely will get some people looking at Third Gens again.

I'm thinking the red car lost because of trying to shift it manually and probably had a weak transmission that was slipping.

If you think your stock HEI can compare to an aftermarket ignition, dream on. And if you think you don't need a better ignition if you don't have any mis-fires,

Good show, enjoyed it. I think that the white IROC pulled down the best E.T. of ANY cars they've built on Full Throttle.
Show me dyno proof while you smack yourself on the head and in the wallet.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 04:13 AM
  #26  
porkyzilla's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,789
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL USA
Car: 89 iroc-z 5.7tpi 350,
Engine: 5.7tpi 350,
Transmission: T-56
i tried using a tv tuner card and recording it on my computer but i forgot to hook up audio so no audio just video

anyone else record it on vhs or onto computer if on vhs mail me a copy and ill put it into digital form for other third genners to see

and yes i hated the guys who did that none of them had plans on keeping the iroc's ...wish they had done more work like some intake work super ram...cams somethin else to the motor
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:36 AM
  #27  
OneBadZ4U's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, MD
Car: '86 Iroc, '87 Iroc Vert
Engine: 350 TPI, 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 in both
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.45 both LSD's
hmm, Red Devil, I thought I said lighten up not relax?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:00 AM
  #28  
88305tpiT/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 2
From: Ft Worth, TX USA
Car: 2016 Ram 1500
Engine: 3.0L Diesel
Transmission: 8sp
Nah Im with RD, That show made me want to puke with how completely inept the hosts are.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #29  
John Millican's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
I captured the show to my computer that aired Wednesday night, Full Throttle-1988 IROC Z's. It is commercial free and 45 mins long. File size 198MB with a small resolution for quick downloading. Do not attempt full screen view, it will be disappointing. I don't have the bandwidth to make a high res version since it would be 600+MB and out of reach for non-broadband people anyway. PM me for a larger, better copy.

Right click, save target as.
Full Throttle-1988 IROC Z's (198MB)
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #30  
robvas's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Nice video.

Too much BS about Camaros and IROC and all that stuff, should have showed some more car stuff.

Heck, they should have let some people that knew what they were doing mess with the cars.

"Leave it in 2nd a little longer"

It's a TPI, are you nuts?!

Maybe a FI vs Carb or something...

Either way, way better than seeing a show with 2 Hondas
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #31  
5SpeedGTA's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Catasauqua, PA
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5
I don't even see the point of the show. They give two teams the same exact car, and tell them to do the same exact mods. Now race them... Why not just race them in stock for then? I don't get it.

And you could completely tell the two kids had no idea what they were doing. Tuning sport compacts? I doubt they've done anything besides a muffler and tail lights. And they'll think about keeping them... idiots.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #32  
BOTTLEDZ28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 24
From: Mass
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I totally agree with 5speedGTA. The show has no point. I think it would have been better if they gave both teams $3,000 and told them to buy whatever mods they wanted and then raced the cars against each other. That would be a lot better then just building to identically modded cars.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #33  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Hmmm....what could I do to a 350TPI for $3 grand? Heads/cam/headers/intake? Or BBS Designs turbo setup.

The possibilities!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #34  
BOTTLEDZ28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 24
From: Mass
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Exactly. You said it....the possibilities. That would be so much fun to watch 2 teams thumb through catologs and stuff and figure out what they canbuy to get there car to run faster then the others teams' car on the same budget.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 03:44 AM
  #35  
Bill Speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1989 Formy droptop/88 Deville
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: factory RWD, WS6 susp
Well, I think I mentioned in the History section, more video from us enthusiests to sell or trade, on many espects of ownership, is a worthy additional idea for the site, and why not have those cable producers look into sites like these for ideas, if not the printed media?
The mention I allude to starting this off with is History Channel's namesake celebration of the Automobile, at the time, 100 years in motoring I believe. It competed with Driving Passion on TBS but it had particular segments and the most interesting being Firebirds' inception under John Delorean, the man I feel brought us that car. There was the later segment on the 20th Anniversary 1989 Firebird that won kudos across the board. I agree, not the more advanced car of it's time (the 88 mentioned above), but F cars (Camaros and Birds) got the prime handmedown developments of the king of GM, the Eldorado...er, hmmm hehe, the Corvette, lest we forget.
Robert Dorn is one man at GM during the 80s who worked on Cadillac and Pontiac engineering and a man I have no doubt helped make the Tuned Port a wonder of the push-rod 80s V8
Bill
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #36  
Black 91 Z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Starkville, MS
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
I didn't see this episode but I've seen other ones before it. Everyone on there seems to have no idea what they're doing and usually the guys can't drive.

But on the flipside at least there were some thirdgens on the air that weren't in primer, getting crashed, etc. They also ran a descent time, maybe not the best but alright.

I wateched one earlier where they worked on a 240Z (might have been a 280Z) and ran a 22! I think the winning ET was in the 17s. And yes this was in the quarter mile.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #37  
pvt num 11's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
Twenty-two seconds? Were they proud of their 17-second run? Goodness, my old 2.8 beater could probably do better then that - and it was terribly out of tune! I didn't see it (no TV at home) but I'll go and download the saved portion (Thank you! If all I do is laugh, thank you anyway!) and watch to see what these kids did. I like the same budget-same car idea. Two (heck, even three or four) teams competing with the same car and the same budget. Maybe one does an LT1 swap, another does a stroked L98 or something, the third guys carb theirs and the fourth decided to use juice and suspension stuff, and they all have a shot-out. But no one wins a car, it's jsut to demonstrate different ways of tackling the same problem. Dunno, unless someone decides to do that on their own and try to sell the idea to Speed Channel or whoever, it'll never see air time. I can dream, though.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #38  
Bill Speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1989 Formy droptop/88 Deville
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: factory RWD, WS6 susp
Hot Rod featured one that was stripped and reworked a few times, but in this case, it was a white and black Firebird Formua akin to mine that had T-tops and was SLP enhensed, This Bird ran 11 seconds, or close to. I recall, while I can't find the magazine, I saved pics of the cover and it was brought up here before so the idea these cars can't run much better then stock with 1K or more invested, I think it's absurd.
Largely these cars become just fodder for shows like Fear Factor to launch repeatedly until the salvage yard awaits.
-B
Attached Thumbnails IROC Shootout on History Channel-fusco-bird1.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 11:56 PM
  #39  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
Anyone know what kind of dyno they ran the car on? seemed portale and probably fairly cheap.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfinityShade
Tech / General Engine
2
Feb 21, 2016 01:29 PM
someone972
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
Aug 30, 2015 12:52 AM
htrdbmr
DIY PROM
2
Aug 18, 2015 12:58 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM
BrianI
Body
0
Aug 9, 2015 11:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.