Dyno Results
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Dyno Results
My dyno numbers are 370rwhp @ 5700rpm- 401rwtq @ 4800rpm. What kind of e.t.'s should the car make and who has simular numbers?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
370 rwhp and that torque should trap higher than 109.
330rwhp ls1 cars do 109 if driven right. u have 40more hp. and alot more torque.
i'd say low 12's at 112
330rwhp ls1 cars do 109 if driven right. u have 40more hp. and alot more torque.
i'd say low 12's at 112
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 4
From: Mims, Florida
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
Check my sig. (Yea, I think my car should be faster)
Your car should easily run into the high 11s with a good 60' time and the trap speed should be about 114mph.
ir-regardless of your sig.
BTW: is this a trick question????
Your car should easily run into the high 11s with a good 60' time and the trap speed should be about 114mph.
ir-regardless of your sig.
BTW: is this a trick question????
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Vincent just had his car dyno tuned. He picked up a little power and torque. Those are his new power numbers but the times are from the pre dyno tune.
I don't think he will have any problem getting into the 12.4's. He is racing at California Raceway which does not have the best traction in the world and is not among the faster tracks.
He is doing quite well considering it is a 355 and completely California smog legal.
I might add that Dyno Don is turning out some good motors. There are a couple comming down the pike that out to put down some good numbers.
I don't think he will have any problem getting into the 12.4's. He is racing at California Raceway which does not have the best traction in the world and is not among the faster tracks.
He is doing quite well considering it is a 355 and completely California smog legal.
I might add that Dyno Don is turning out some good motors. There are a couple comming down the pike that out to put down some good numbers.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
No, this is not a trick question. I'm just curious to know what kind of e.t.'s some of you are running with simular numbers. I just dyno the car 11-26-05. My e.t. in my sig was before the dyno. California Speedway 1/4mi track elevation is about 1800 above sea level.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Ok! Here's my Graph. Dyno Don posted my graph for me.
What do ya'll think? The e.t.'s was done before the dyno. A new chip was burned after the dyno. No new e.t. yet.
What do ya'll think? The e.t.'s was done before the dyno. A new chip was burned after the dyno. No new e.t. yet.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 4
From: Mims, Florida
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
Those are great numbers.
I dont know anything about altitude and ET effects. But, I still believe that if you ran the car at Norwalk, Ohio, you would be in the 11s.
A dragstrip at 1800 ft is going to have a noticable effect on ETs.
Does anyone have a good relationship between ETs and altitude?
I dont know anything about altitude and ET effects. But, I still believe that if you ran the car at Norwalk, Ohio, you would be in the 11s.
A dragstrip at 1800 ft is going to have a noticable effect on ETs.
Does anyone have a good relationship between ETs and altitude?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
I think at sea level the car should run in the low 12's around 113mph. That's my goal I hope!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
He is running a MAP setup. It was during our club dyno day so he only got a few adjustments in. He has more power in it with some more tuning. He will post when he sees your response. I'm just confirming his post.
I will also say with a few more mods and a little tweaking he might hit 400RWHP. All with a California smog legal 355 and very streetable as he takes the car on cruises with the club.
I will also say with a few more mods and a little tweaking he might hit 400RWHP. All with a California smog legal 355 and very streetable as he takes the car on cruises with the club. Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
VincentZ28...I assume you are running a maf set-up?
How much Dyno-time did you need to dial the car in?
Great #'s BTW.....
VincentZ28...I assume you are running a maf set-up?
How much Dyno-time did you need to dial the car in?
Great #'s BTW.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM











