TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MAF Vs. SD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #1  
1irocz2nv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Bolton, Ontario, Canada
MAF Vs. SD

Hello Guys. I'm new to this forum. My first car was a 88 Irocz. Unfortunately, it has become my project car as I am going to save it for when I am an older man(haha). I'm looking into purchasing a new iroc. It's a 90 Iroc. Now, I don't want to start any arguments about MAF and SD, I just want to know each of their advantages and limitations and which would be better suited to my modifications.

So, if I buy the 90 Iroc, I do plan to do some mild work. Bolt ons, intake, maybe a cam, heads. Now, how will the SD respond to this?

The question is should I buy this car or should I wait out and find a 88 or 89 and go with the MAF?

Remember, no arguments!
Thanks for your help guys. Great site

Frank
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 06:20 PM
  #2  
ResurrectingZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC 1991 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI 5.0 TBI
Transmission: T-5 , 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 twice
A MAF system will tolerate more bolt-ons as far as the ECM goes, just not too wild either. The speed density system is more desirable for the lack of the $$ of MAF sensor, I am not that knowledgable as far as speed density systems, from what I have read is that nearly any change would require adjustment in the PROM. Read the stickies and learn a lot.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #3  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
Either way you go, you should have(or DIY) tune the car after any mods. When you change engine perimeters you should always re-tune the computer to enable it to perfomr properly with the modification.

- That said, MAF will tolerate much more than SD without having to be re-tuned. In the long run SD is better because there are no limitations. No matter which way you go, if you intend on many/decent mods, you need to either look into PROM tuning equipment or an aftermarket ecm.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
ator's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 92 Firebird Formula
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4, 3.73 rear
If you do a search you find TONS & TONS of info on this. But As long as you don't change the heads or cam you can run a SD without burning a chip.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #5  
Chrome's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, IN
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Still a "perfect" tune even with Headers and Intake (!TPI) would need a burnt chip.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #6  
91Z28CAMARO32's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: POTSDAM NEW YORK
Car: 91 Z28 CAMARO
Engine: 383 STROKER TPI
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
where do u sent ur chip to get burned
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #7  
ResurrectingZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC 1991 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI 5.0 TBI
Transmission: T-5 , 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 twice
After reading all the threads on this site, you can get a company (TPIS, Comp Cams, ect.) to burn you a custom chip, but may hassle you if it is not running up-to-spec or where you think it should be. Best way I have been reading the forums is on making a custom chip, cheaper and you can change the results, unless you have tons of $$, and if you do send some my way.

wOOt.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
May 24, 2018 01:02 PM
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
Feb 26, 2016 02:57 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
Oct 3, 2015 03:46 PM
Ikes 91Z
LSX and LTX Parts
0
Sep 13, 2015 09:03 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.