Quest for a better flowing TPI
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,771
Likes: 1,001
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Quest for a better flowing TPI
Don are you referring to extending the ve tables ?
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...ve-tables.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...ve-tables.html
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: Quest for a better flowing TPI
No, Just using a different bin file.
AXCN for SD starting a new project or combination.
APYP for MAF starting a new project or combination.
We were using AXXD where the problem occurred.
AXCN for SD starting a new project or combination.
APYP for MAF starting a new project or combination.
We were using AXXD where the problem occurred.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Quest for a better flowing TPI
This is what he talking about. The first video is with the 305manual program. This was used because GM didn’t make an F-Body 350 manual program and only program up to 5600. But they made it in the Corvette manual program in which can be programmed to 6400.
This video is the Corvette 350 manual program.
This video is the Corvette 350 manual program.
Member
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 268
Likes: 114
From: Central Texas
Car: 1987 L98 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt
Re: Our quest for a better flowing TPI
.02 worth
From June 1996 Motorcyclist
Typed by Todd Knighton, Protomotive Engineering
http://g-speed.com/pbh/cylinder-head-tech.html
read the whole article this is just a small quote.
"Ford's 1960's four-cam V-8 also had huge intake ports, and while it turned more revs than the Offy four-banger engines then dominant at Indianapolis, it was no better than a match for them. When given an early peek at the Indy Ford's cylinder-head castings, I expressed the thought that its ports might be too big. Ford's engineers were too polite to tell me how absurd they considered my remark to be, but their expressions made it plain. I was too polite to send them an "I told you so" note after Dan Gurney sent one of the engines to Weslake Engineering in England, where it's intake ports were made smaller and its output got bigger.
Ford's engineers were then vastly ignorant of the world beyond Michigan's borders. They had no idea Harry Weslake and Wally Hassan (who created the very successful Coventry-Climax racing engines) had learned years before not to take too literally what the flow bench said. They were narrowing intake ports to provide nominal gas speeds in the range of 350 to 400 feet-second, making good use of the fact that kinetic energy packing air into the cylinders increases with the square of it's velocity."
From June 1996 Motorcyclist
Typed by Todd Knighton, Protomotive Engineering
http://g-speed.com/pbh/cylinder-head-tech.html
read the whole article this is just a small quote.
"Ford's 1960's four-cam V-8 also had huge intake ports, and while it turned more revs than the Offy four-banger engines then dominant at Indianapolis, it was no better than a match for them. When given an early peek at the Indy Ford's cylinder-head castings, I expressed the thought that its ports might be too big. Ford's engineers were too polite to tell me how absurd they considered my remark to be, but their expressions made it plain. I was too polite to send them an "I told you so" note after Dan Gurney sent one of the engines to Weslake Engineering in England, where it's intake ports were made smaller and its output got bigger.
Ford's engineers were then vastly ignorant of the world beyond Michigan's borders. They had no idea Harry Weslake and Wally Hassan (who created the very successful Coventry-Climax racing engines) had learned years before not to take too literally what the flow bench said. They were narrowing intake ports to provide nominal gas speeds in the range of 350 to 400 feet-second, making good use of the fact that kinetic energy packing air into the cylinders increases with the square of it's velocity."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM











