TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 913
Likes: 2
From: greenfield indiana
Car: 86' IROC-Z....and 5 other 3rdgens
Engine: 383 hsr
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.23, 10bolt
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
My results are coming, although mine are coming with the turbo, though. I still need to weld up a few pinholes in the headers that I made, as well as coat them, so I don't mind making a pass naturally aspirated. I already have the tune for it saved...
That is honestly all it is supposed to do, as it is still pulling air through the stock throttle body in my application so there is no real gain per se, just more usable RPM. Acceleration Enrichment and Spark Advance both need to be tweaked in the prom to maximize the modification. With my stock setup RPM wouldn't budge much past 4500-RPM at wide open throttle on the highway (NA), now it shoots up well above that even w/out the turbo, which was my whole intention for siamesing the setup from the getgo. I uploaded and edited these pictures in photobucket about a minute ago, and made them all smaller and brighter but photobucket takes awhile to accept the edit, so bear with the size of some of the pictures for the time being. My only goal was RPM by doing this, though...




That is honestly all it is supposed to do, as it is still pulling air through the stock throttle body in my application so there is no real gain per se, just more usable RPM. Acceleration Enrichment and Spark Advance both need to be tweaked in the prom to maximize the modification. With my stock setup RPM wouldn't budge much past 4500-RPM at wide open throttle on the highway (NA), now it shoots up well above that even w/out the turbo, which was my whole intention for siamesing the setup from the getgo. I uploaded and edited these pictures in photobucket about a minute ago, and made them all smaller and brighter but photobucket takes awhile to accept the edit, so bear with the size of some of the pictures for the time being. My only goal was RPM by doing this, though...




. you were deffinatly suppose to get siamesed runners if you siamesed the plenum and base. Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,538
Likes: 206
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Originally Posted by cIaRmOaCrZo
did you use those runners with that base??? i dont get how making it flow individualy through the runners and then have it open back up for 1", and then back to individual.....the base is ported good, the plenum is ported good,,,then you have the runners
. you were deffinatly suppose to get siamesed runners if you siamesed the plenum and base....
. you were deffinatly suppose to get siamesed runners if you siamesed the plenum and base....Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 29
From: Aurora, OR
Car: 87 IROC Z28
Engine: 355 cid TPI
Transmission: Custom Built 700R4 w/3,500 stall
Axle/Gears: QP fab 9" 3.70 Truetrac
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
I have wondered myself how this would be beneficial. At a glance it appears that this would create more turbulence than anything else and actually hurt flow. However, I have heard others who performed this mod say that it did extend their top end noticably. My combo already pulls hard past 6,500 and works well shifting at 6,800 so I don't think I want to try anything like this right now. I'm watching what 89GTA is doing for ideas for the future.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Those AS&M Runners With The Stock Plenum Matched Up & Ported Hi Flow Base Is Exactly What I Want At The Top, I Want To Keep It Looking Factory. Then Going With The 195 AFR Heads And Then A Comp Cam, But Still Looking Into Cam Specs. What Power Are You Making With That Intake Set Up If You Don't Mind Me Asking?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
If that's true about your block came out of a Yukon, it's a 9.3 compression short block. It has dish pistion. But thats ok. With a thin head gasket (.028 GM), we can get it up to 9.8 compression and still make 370whp. If I remember right, you wanted to use a HSR. If so, you can go with the same set up as Burnout91z. He has a 9.8 compression(stock L98 Short Block), HSR, 280XFI Cam, AFR's 195 and Dyno Don's exhaust systems. It made 397whp.
Yeah He Said He Rebuilt The Motor After Pulling It Out Because It Was From The Junyard, So I Have No Idea What He Put Into It. My Friend Was The One Who Was Buying The Car At The Time So I Wasn't Paying Attention To Everything He Was Saying, I Had No Idea I Was Going To Buy The Car Off My Friend A Year Later. I Wish I Had A Way To Get In Contact With The Guy Again. All I Know Is He Stays Over In San Diego Somewhere.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Speaking of old tech, your LS1 is getting long in the tooth now. If you want to stay current, its time to upgrade to an LS3 or LS7 now, isnt it? You wouldnt want to get left behind working on old technology when there are so much more potential and less cost in new techonology, right?
With These Direct Inject Engines GM Is Working On The LS Engine In General Will Become Old Technology Within A Couple More Years. Just Think In About 10 Years The Younger Generation Of Gear Heads Still In Elementary & Middle School Now Will Be Knocking LS Guys Saying They Are Old LoL It's A Never Ending Cycle, But No Matter How Old Or How New There Is Always Respect For A Car Being Original From It's Time Period, It's A Part Of History. Wasn't The 5.7L TPI & 700r4 Trans The 1st Corvette Engine/Trans. To Be Put Into A Camaro & Be Mass Produced From The Factory? Just About Every SS Or Z28 Camaro Since Then Has Had An Engine & Transmission That Originated From The Corvette.
Last edited by KingsHustleLA; Jun 16, 2012 at 04:26 PM.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 7
From: Northern California - Bay Area
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Ha yeah it is a never ending cycle of change. What gets me sometimes is that the basic knowledge of how an internal combustion engine works (Gen 1 - Gen 5 engine family soon) is still important.
I amazes me that many of the LS people won't want to work on a car that has a carb on it. No matter what generation of engine you are running you still need to understand the basics. Then you can go from there and change things as you see fit.
I like my old school TPI L98. I plan on keeping that engine in my car. I have no problem with the LS guys but, I don't like it when they bash on TPI and carb old school motors. Ha ha if the old school Gen 1 small block wasn't a such a sucess there would be no LS engines now. People forget that GM was thinking about getting rid of the V8 engine for good in the late 70's and early 80's because of all the new emissions and fuel economy standards. Even now with the new Gen 5 small blocks, GM is saying that they will have a reduced displacement (when compaired to the Gen 4 motors in production now). The power and performance should be compariable to what is available now thanks to direct injection and some more weight saving measures taken.
As someone mentioned before, the Gen 1 - Gen 4 LS motors are very good but will be uphanded by the new Gen 5 series of motors now. As good as the LS1 engine is you could say that it's an old school LS engine (debuted in 1997 in the C5) now compaired to the LS3, LS7, LSA, and LS9 that have come out in recent years.
I amazes me that many of the LS people won't want to work on a car that has a carb on it. No matter what generation of engine you are running you still need to understand the basics. Then you can go from there and change things as you see fit.
I like my old school TPI L98. I plan on keeping that engine in my car. I have no problem with the LS guys but, I don't like it when they bash on TPI and carb old school motors. Ha ha if the old school Gen 1 small block wasn't a such a sucess there would be no LS engines now. People forget that GM was thinking about getting rid of the V8 engine for good in the late 70's and early 80's because of all the new emissions and fuel economy standards. Even now with the new Gen 5 small blocks, GM is saying that they will have a reduced displacement (when compaired to the Gen 4 motors in production now). The power and performance should be compariable to what is available now thanks to direct injection and some more weight saving measures taken.
As someone mentioned before, the Gen 1 - Gen 4 LS motors are very good but will be uphanded by the new Gen 5 series of motors now. As good as the LS1 engine is you could say that it's an old school LS engine (debuted in 1997 in the C5) now compaired to the LS3, LS7, LSA, and LS9 that have come out in recent years.
Last edited by yaj15; Jun 17, 2012 at 09:52 PM. Reason: grammar
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Ha yeah it is a never ending cycle of change. What gets me sometimes is that the basic knowledge of how an internal combustion engine works (Gen 1 - Gen 5 engine family soon) is still important.
I amazes me that many of the LS people won't want to work on a car that has a carb on it. No matter what generation of engine you are running you still need to understand the basics. Then you can go from there and change things as you see fit.
I like my old school TPI L98. I plan on keeping that engine in my car. I have no problem with the LS guys but, I don't like it when they bash on TPI and carb old school motors. Ha ha if the old school Gen 1 small block wasn't a such a sucess there would be no LS engines now. People forget that GM was thinking about getting rid of the V8 engine for good in the late 70's and early 80's because of all the new emissions and fuel economy standards. Even now with the new Gen 5 small blocks, GM is saying that they will have a reduced displacement (when compaired to the Gen 4 motors in production now). The power and performance should be compariable to what is available now thanks to direct injection and some more weight saving measures taken.
As someone mentioned before, the Gen 1 - Gen 4 LS motors are very good but will be uphanded by the new Gen 5 series of motors now. As good as the LS1 engine is you could say that it's an old school LS engine (debuted in 1997 in the C5) now compaired to the LS3, LS7, LSA, and LS9 that have come out in recent years.
I amazes me that many of the LS people won't want to work on a car that has a carb on it. No matter what generation of engine you are running you still need to understand the basics. Then you can go from there and change things as you see fit.
I like my old school TPI L98. I plan on keeping that engine in my car. I have no problem with the LS guys but, I don't like it when they bash on TPI and carb old school motors. Ha ha if the old school Gen 1 small block wasn't a such a sucess there would be no LS engines now. People forget that GM was thinking about getting rid of the V8 engine for good in the late 70's and early 80's because of all the new emissions and fuel economy standards. Even now with the new Gen 5 small blocks, GM is saying that they will have a reduced displacement (when compaired to the Gen 4 motors in production now). The power and performance should be compariable to what is available now thanks to direct injection and some more weight saving measures taken.
As someone mentioned before, the Gen 1 - Gen 4 LS motors are very good but will be uphanded by the new Gen 5 series of motors now. As good as the LS1 engine is you could say that it's an old school LS engine (debuted in 1997 in the C5) now compaired to the LS3, LS7, LSA, and LS9 that have come out in recent years.
Yeah I See Where You're Coming From & I Agree, Just Because An Engine Is Old Doesn't Make It Junk, For It's Time It Was The Sh** And People Bought It! If Something Was Junk It Would Have Never Sold Enough To Make Something New. Carbs Sold Good So The TPI Came Out, The TPI Sold Good So The LT Series Motors Came Out, The LT's Sold Good So GM Came Out With The LS Engines And So On.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 7
From: Northern California - Bay Area
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Yeah I See Where You're Coming From & I Agree, Just Because An Engine Is Old Doesn't Make It Junk, For It's Time It Was The Sh** And People Bought It! If Something Was Junk It Would Have Never Sold Enough To Make Something New. Carbs Sold Good So The TPI Came Out, The TPI Sold Good So The LT Series Motors Came Out, The LT's Sold Good So GM Came Out With The LS Engines And So On.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: charlotte
Car: 1986 Camaro
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 411
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Random Question, Is Or Has Anybody Ever Used A 400 Transmission With A TPI? I Was Wondering If That Would Be Better Than A 700R4.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,228
Likes: 1,156
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 13
From: Troup, Texas
Car: 1989 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: ZZZ# 0607 of 1200 produced
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4/Vig.2400
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW 9 Bolt PBR Disc
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Will
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
Just for general information I re-dyno'd my long tube runner setup and with 21+" total runner length the peak horsepower was at 6500rpm. No more information will be available at this time. To much competition going on around here.
Got to keep things in reserve against those pesky LSX swaps around here in case I need to go back to the track.
Got to keep things in reserve against those pesky LSX swaps around here in case I need to go back to the track. Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 133
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
I have wondered myself how this would be beneficial. At a glance it appears that this would create more turbulence than anything else and actually hurt flow. However, I have heard others who performed this mod say that it did extend their top end noticably. My combo already pulls hard past 6,500 and works well shifting at 6,800 so I don't think I want to try anything like this right now. I'm watching what 89GTA is doing for ideas for the future.
Here is mine and 89GTA's:
Mine is the one that is falling off, his goes on past 6800.
Last edited by Dyno Don; Jun 23, 2012 at 10:01 AM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 133
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI's With After Market Heads & Cam?
It has a first base flowing 300+
This is the intake runner setup:
This is the intake runner setup:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM











