flywheel weight vs. torque vs. gears
flywheel weight vs. torque vs. gears
Okay, I've got a couple questions for all you smart folks. I bought a stealth ram for my 305 (yes I know a 305 is too small), b/c I didn't want to waste $$$ building a TPI setup that won't support a larger engine/ high rpms.
The cam in my 305 likes to make mid range power. So, if the setup is going to run like ***/lose low-end torque, would a decent way to compensate be to go with a lighter flywheel? I am converting to a T56 setup, and am currently running 3.27 gears (which will eventually be replaced w/ 3.73s). I figure that with a lighter flywheel, the engine will spend less time outside of its powerband, and will spool up more quickly thus minimizing the effects of low-end torque loss.
Also, how well would flywheel weight correlate w/ rearend gearing? AKA could a lighter flywheel compensate for higher gearing as well?
What do all y'all think?
TIA
MILT
The cam in my 305 likes to make mid range power. So, if the setup is going to run like ***/lose low-end torque, would a decent way to compensate be to go with a lighter flywheel? I am converting to a T56 setup, and am currently running 3.27 gears (which will eventually be replaced w/ 3.73s). I figure that with a lighter flywheel, the engine will spend less time outside of its powerband, and will spool up more quickly thus minimizing the effects of low-end torque loss.
Also, how well would flywheel weight correlate w/ rearend gearing? AKA could a lighter flywheel compensate for higher gearing as well?
What do all y'all think?
TIA
MILT
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Bergen County, NJ
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Re: flywheel weight vs. torque vs. gears
Originally posted by MILT
Also, how well would flywheel weight correlate w/ rearend gearing? AKA could a lighter flywheel compensate for higher gearing as well?
What do all y'all think?
TIA
MILT
Also, how well would flywheel weight correlate w/ rearend gearing? AKA could a lighter flywheel compensate for higher gearing as well?
What do all y'all think?
TIA
MILT
i see very little if any correlation between the two. except that both should help you with accelerating, less rotational mass and steeper gearing
The lower the rear end gear ratio (3.73's, 4.11's) the easier it is to accelerate. The benefits of the lighter flywheel will work well with these gears. If you road race at all the lighter flywheel is the only way to go.
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton AB Canada
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 355 4 bbl
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.73 L/S
Originally posted by Pro Built Automatics
The lower the rear end gear ratio (3.73's, 4.11's) the easier it is to accelerate. The benefits of the lighter flywheel will work well with these gears. If you road race at all the lighter flywheel is the only way to go.
The lower the rear end gear ratio (3.73's, 4.11's) the easier it is to accelerate. The benefits of the lighter flywheel will work well with these gears. If you road race at all the lighter flywheel is the only way to go.
I think you should stay away from the lighter flywheel until you get more torque multiplication in the rear (like 4.11s). Perhaps then the lighter flywheel would help.
With a 3.27 rear you would find yourself slipping the clutch a lot more when taking off from a stop, and the engine would feel like it has lost significant off-idle torque.
When you have a really fast-revving combination it gets to a point where the engine is wasting power on spinning the flywheel up to speed. I think your setup is a long way from that, light flywheels work better in lighter cars and more rear gear than what you have.
In my humble opinion, of course...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Sep 1, 2015 04:32 PM
BlackphantomZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 31, 2015 10:29 AM






