Clutch Hydraulics
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: united kingdom
Car: Transam
Engine: ZZ4,Holley Stealth Ram,Commander 950
Transmission: T56
Clutch Hydraulics
Im fitting a T56 to my 85 TA(in place of the 700R4)using a standard type clutch not a push type.
Although ive bought a bellhousing and the clutch hydraulics from a scrap car(via Spohn)I want to replace the master,slave and reservoir so that i can have all new.The GM dealer here in the UK says there are three different option codes for the 3rd gen.All i know is that the used prts that ive got are from a 1988 car but obviously i dont know exactly what option they are.
Can any of you help out here with what i need.
The pic shows what ive got now.
Thanks
PM
Although ive bought a bellhousing and the clutch hydraulics from a scrap car(via Spohn)I want to replace the master,slave and reservoir so that i can have all new.The GM dealer here in the UK says there are three different option codes for the 3rd gen.All i know is that the used prts that ive got are from a 1988 car but obviously i dont know exactly what option they are.
Can any of you help out here with what i need.
The pic shows what ive got now.
Thanks
PM
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Holbrook NY
Car: 1982 Z/28 H.O.
Engine: 355
Transmission: t-5
now i bought a tranny and all the goodies out of an 84 z/28 and they look exatly the same. The only difference i could think of would be that of a performance option.
To tell you the truth i would go and order a setup from an Iroc or a 1LE/BC4 camaro so this way if there is a difference it is only for the better.
I hope this helps you out
To tell you the truth i would go and order a setup from an Iroc or a 1LE/BC4 camaro so this way if there is a difference it is only for the better.
I hope this helps you out
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: Clutch Hydraulics
Originally posted by powermite
Im fitting a T56 to my 85 TA(in place of the 700R4)using a standard type clutch not a push type.
Im fitting a T56 to my 85 TA(in place of the 700R4)using a standard type clutch not a push type.

Although ive bought a bellhousing and the clutch hydraulics from a scrap car(via Spohn)I want to replace the master,slave and reservoir so that i can have all new.The GM dealer here in the UK says there are three different option codes for the 3rd gen.All i know is that the used prts that ive got are from a 1988 car but obviously i dont know exactly what option they are.Can any of you help out here with what i need.
The pic shows what ive got now.
Thanks
PM
The pic shows what ive got now.
Thanks
PM
-Matthew
Last edited by jmd; Feb 11, 2004 at 10:08 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
There are at least 3 different hydraulic assemblies that I know of, that the GM books show for various ones of these cars. Let me share my experience with you.
As I was driving down the street one day, my line burst. I pulled into a church parking lot and left the car. Next day I went to the dealer to buy the whole assembly since mine was really old by then and had about 150,000 miles on it. Keep in mind I have a 83 car, with a 84 hydraulic bell housing in it, and the trans out of a 91. So I ask for the hydraulics for a 91. THey look it up, it's out of stock. So I ask them to look at other years, starting with 84. Nope, out of stock on that one too. So they look it up for a 87. Great, got that one on the shelf.
It is perfect. Works as good as one possibly could. Went right in no problems.
So, I don't think there's much difference among them; maybe a different bend in the line or something.
I also have a 91 bell housing, that I've compared at great length to the 84 one. I can find no difference.
Just buy what you can get, it will work.
As I was driving down the street one day, my line burst. I pulled into a church parking lot and left the car. Next day I went to the dealer to buy the whole assembly since mine was really old by then and had about 150,000 miles on it. Keep in mind I have a 83 car, with a 84 hydraulic bell housing in it, and the trans out of a 91. So I ask for the hydraulics for a 91. THey look it up, it's out of stock. So I ask them to look at other years, starting with 84. Nope, out of stock on that one too. So they look it up for a 87. Great, got that one on the shelf.
It is perfect. Works as good as one possibly could. Went right in no problems.
So, I don't think there's much difference among them; maybe a different bend in the line or something.
I also have a 91 bell housing, that I've compared at great length to the 84 one. I can find no difference.
Just buy what you can get, it will work.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Car: 91Z, 91RS, '84 Jimmy
Engine: L98, 355, L98
Transmission: 700R, T56, 700R4
Pasky....you're right that they have no bleeder. To bleed the LT1 style hydros you just pull the slave loose and pump it in and out by hand for a few minutes. The air bubbles will rise into the fluid reservoir.
I'd go with the LT1 hydros, mainly because the steel pressure line won't melt if it gets next to the exhaust. I saw a T-5 car with a melted line once and it was a BIG mess. Brake fluid all over the bottom of the car...paint bubbled...not pretty.
I'd go with the LT1 hydros, mainly because the steel pressure line won't melt if it gets next to the exhaust. I saw a T-5 car with a melted line once and it was a BIG mess. Brake fluid all over the bottom of the car...paint bubbled...not pretty.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








