poly mount size difference
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
poly mount size difference
I am hunting down a drivetrain shake and am wondering if it is from my Polyuerethene transmission mount by Energy Suspension. I would like to what the size difference is from a rubber to poly mount. I would measure mine but I therw the old one. I know there is a difference, people say you have to shim them, but how much?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
The energy trans mount is about 1/4" taller than a stock rubber mount due to the use of that preload plate. I have found this height difference to cause vibration problems in several different cars. My advice would be to swap back to a stock rubber mount and see if the vibration goes away.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 2
From: Fla
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
If your using the plate just take it out and bolt the poly mount back up. It buts against steel anyway so no need for it. Mine vibrated as well so i took out the plate and it went away. The plate seems to be the problem in the cars ive used the poly mount on. I sure dont miss having to change out the broken rubber one everytime i put my foot into it.
I could tell no real difference in vibrations from the rubber to poly. If you do have a problem elsewhere though. The poly will only make it show up more.
I could tell no real difference in vibrations from the rubber to poly. If you do have a problem elsewhere though. The poly will only make it show up more.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Right you are! I shimmed the crossmember a hair also, what a difference. The only down side is that I just lost the backmassage everytime I drive now.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: garland,tx
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: turbo 350
i ended up puting a second plate in mine because its so low. i tried to set pinion angle by putting an extra plate in, but i couldnt do alot to change it. i basicly did it to compensate for the rear being moved up in the chassie. my vibration went away with an extra plate.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
The only way to really adjust pinion angle is with an adjustable torque arm and LCAs. Without adjustment you could end up causing the suspension to bind, because the factory alignment has been altered. This isn't the hot ticket for good ET or handling.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
15
Nov 10, 2015 06:17 AM
knight72
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Aug 10, 2015 09:32 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 5, 2015 07:57 PM






