Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

I know this has been talked about a lot - poly trans mounts...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #1  
kaptinkafeen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Erin, Ont
I know this has been talked about a lot - poly trans mounts...

Like the title suggests, I know that there have been a lot of threads about the poly trans mounts and the added driveline vibration that some people experience with them.... One of the many solutions to the vibration is to replace the poly mount with an OEM rubber mount - BUT, and forgive me If this is stupid to ask, when you do something like that aren't you just 'covering up' the problem? Shouldn't a drive shaft be checked-balanced. There are many guys out there with the poly mounts and they experience no to minimal added vibrations...
I am currently one of those guys who has installed a poly mount and at about 2500-3000rpm gets vibrations running through the car that I previously didn't have.... I can go back to the rubber mount, but I don't like masking problems if they do exist.
TIA
-Andrew
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 09:43 AM
  #2  
Mark1963's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Stock England
How bad is the vibration?

It could be that you're experiencing normal engine vibration. Because the poly mounts are harder they would transmit more vibration into car than oem rubber mounts.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
- ever picked up a crankshaft, rods, pistons, drive shaft, tq converter, trans input drum, etc? steal parts all spinning at X rpm = "x" amount of vibration. There are no zero vibration motors/drivelines. Why do you think the factory used rubber mounts instead of just bolting everything directly to the frame?
- I do agree though that urethane mounts shouldn't make for excessive vibration. If they do, I'd be checking out what's causing the vibration.

Last edited by Shagwell; May 11, 2006 at 12:02 PM.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
Camaroguy18's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1986 Camaro SC (Supercool)
Engine: one composed of various metals
I just replaced my stock mount witha poly one last weekend....I havent had anything that was out of the ordinary vibration wise
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #5  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
There's poly, then poly if you have a secondary cross member:

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...g?d=1130154497

JamesC
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #6  
kaptinkafeen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Erin, Ont
I'm running prothane's trans mount, with Spohn's trans relocation braket.
I will get the d.s. checked and double check my engine mounts... see if this makes a difference.
The new vibrations I can live with, just never noticed them before, and would hate to ruin anything due to a part that is "out of wack"...

-Andrew
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #7  
87IROCZ350TPI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: BW 7.75" 3.27
Speaking of that secondary crossmember:
My 87 has a regular transmission crossmember. I just today, came across a dual crossmember at the salvage yard(crossmember and secondary crossmember). Anyone know if I can put the dual crossmember on my car without issues? I got the Hyperflex bushing master kit from energy suspension and it came with the secondary crossmember bushings. Hate for them to go to waste. Thanks in advance for any input.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #8  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
I don't think there's a problem with bolting it up, but I don't recommend using the poly there. I've done it (as you see in the above link) and the increasesd vibration isn't worth it IMO--of course, no rubber is left in my suspension set-up, which, no doubt, also contributes.

JamesC
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #9  
87IROCZ350TPI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: BW 7.75" 3.27
Thanks man.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #10  
kaptinkafeen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Erin, Ont
I pulled my alum.d.s out and had it balanced - it was way out. What a difference now. I have continued to run the poly mount with no 'abnormal' or excessive vibrations.
-Andrew
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 16, 2024 01:50 PM
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
Aug 15, 2021 10:16 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.