rearend question...
rearend question...
I know someone somewhere has probably already answered these questions but I've searched and I cant find what I'm looking for. I am thinking about purchasing a rearend out of a 1995 Firebird to go in my 1986 Trans am. I know these rearends will swap out but I'm wondering what size this rearend is. Is it the 7.5, 7.625, 8.2? Also, does anyone know about what kind of gears it will have? I have the 2.73 ratio gear. Sorry for this post being so long but any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks!
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: rearend question...
Welcome to TGO. Most of your questions will probably be answered by the following sticky:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tran...-10-bolts.html
JamesC
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tran...-10-bolts.html
JamesC
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,812
Likes: 109
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: rearend question...
for all intensive purposes, 7.5 and 7.625 are the same thing. The rear will be a 7.625/7.5 rear, and there is no way for me to tell you what gears are in it. Pull the cover off and count the teeth.
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Evington,Va
Car: 93 Formula,88 T/A,01 WS6
Engine: 93 LT1,88TPI305,01 LS1
Transmission: 93 700R4,88 700R4,01 T56
Axle/Gears: 93 3:73's,88 3:42,01 3:40
Re: rearend question...
7.5, 7.62 either way its a small 10 bolt it could have anything from 2:73 to 3:42 just like third gens. If its out of a T/A or Formula it should be a 3:24. But hard to tell for sure. Remember 4th gen rears are 4 inchs wider over all so get ready for your tires to stick out or to buy new wheels
Re: rearend question...
Like all 4th gen rear axle assemblies it is 10-bolt with a 7.625 dia gear. The ratio could be a 2:73, 3:23 or 3:42 these are the only stock ratios available.
Re: rearend question...
ok thanks guys. only reason I'm thinking about getting the rearend is because I broke my 26 splined axle in my other rearend and I know this one should have 28 splined axles. Are the 28 splined axles that much better than the 26?
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,812
Likes: 109
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: rearend question...
they are 2 splines better, they are still not a very strong rear.
Trending Topics
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: rearend question...
For the most part, all this is outlined in the sticky.
JamesC
JamesC
Last edited by JamesC; Feb 25, 2009 at 09:11 PM.
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Evington,Va
Car: 93 Formula,88 T/A,01 WS6
Engine: 93 LT1,88TPI305,01 LS1
Transmission: 93 700R4,88 700R4,01 T56
Axle/Gears: 93 3:73's,88 3:42,01 3:40
Re: rearend question...
I was not stating that the tires would stick out past the quarter panels. They "Stick out" further than the stock rear end. This gives the car an unbalanced look about it. the front of the car should be wider than the back which is why IROC's T/A's GTA's and such have wheels marked "Front" and "Rear". this wider rear end puts your tires closer to the inner quarter panel make it then more likely to rub during cornering or with a load in the car (I.E.Friends in the back seat). It does give the car a more agressive stance from the front and side, but with out a wider wheel and tire combo for the rear, from the rear it looks odd. I personally do not see any advantage to puting a 4th gen rear under a third gen unless you do go with a wider rear wheel. For handling purposes you want the front to be wider than the rear. But again for the average driver you propably would never see ant differance and it wouldnt matter anyway. So if anyone really wants one.....I have 3 or so lying around I'd be happy to sell you. I'd just put the brakes on the third gen rear and be done with it.(And yes I know that would take more time and effort)
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: rearend question...
I was not stating that the tires would stick out past the quarter panels. They "Stick out" further than the stock rear end. This gives the car an unbalanced look about it. the front of the car should be wider than the back which is why IROC's T/A's GTA's and such have wheels marked "Front" and "Rear". this wider rear end puts your tires closer to the inner quarter panel make it then more likely to rub during cornering or with a load in the car (I.E.Friends in the back seat). It does give the car a more agressive stance from the front and side, but with out a wider wheel and tire combo for the rear, from the rear it looks odd. I personally do not see any advantage to puting a 4th gen rear under a third gen unless you do go with a wider rear wheel. For handling purposes you want the front to be wider than the rear. But again for the average driver you propably would never see ant differance and it wouldnt matter anyway. So if anyone really wants one.....I have 3 or so lying around I'd be happy to sell you. I'd just put the brakes on the third gen rear and be done with it.(And yes I know that would take more time and effort)
#1...Your wrong, about the "For handling purposes you want the front to be wider than the rear.".....Track widths are made narrower, by the factory, to cause the rear end of a car, to "fall in line" behind the front. It does NOT make a car handle "better". It merely makes it EASIER for your average driver to maintain control.
#2.....It does NOT look better, the way the factory set them up. How many times have you heard, from people who notice the shallower outside lip vs the deeper outer lip on the front wheels....."That just looks wrong....Looks like the rear wheels are narrower than the fronts." Have you ever seen a custom car, built with narrows in back, wider up front? OH YEAH......R I C E R S do that, for drag racing.

#3.....For handling purposes, you want all 4 to be equal, or the rears wider. Front being wider makes the car do things, that the (performance) driver has to fight.
#4....The wheels are marked that way, so people don't mount the rears on the fronts. Fronts fit rear, rear doesn't fit front.
#5.....Who goes to buy new wheels & gets deeper nackspacing for the rear? NOBODY! They buy all 4 to match. The wheel shop doesn't even make the suggestion that you do that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Tech / General Engine
336
Apr 28, 2020 10:39 PM










